ProComp heads on a SBO 350
Oil technology is the main reason..using heavy oil to lubricate was the norm.the ls requires a computer...expensive fuel injection..and other assorted parts.Id rather invest old school with forged parts...hyper kinetic pistons..wtf is thst crap?...you guys are brain washed by the new crowd..thats fine..
Im laughing pretty good.
Im laughing pretty good.
Last edited by Nasty455; Jun 20, 2013 at 06:28 AM.
Oil technology was not the only reason. Cheap parts went into the sbc. We had a 75 Olds Cutlass from that era, went very high miles. That car is one reason I like the 350 so much. Look how fast the new Mustang, Challenger and Camaro's are. Even the scoffed at 3.5's in the Challenger boosted can run 11's. Why? Technology and cross bolted mains
.
.
For the 2k fuel injection and a few cpmputer chips cost...Ill be sporting a nice forged power plant with a nice dyers blower sticking through the hood.trick parts like your ls just get you a lighter wallet..I dont buy any new junk from GM...todays car companies are all about greed...not QUALITY products..take that to the bank!
Oil technology is the main reason..using heavy oil to lubricate was the norm.the ls requires a computer...expensive fuel injection..and other assorted parts.Id rather invest old school with forged parts...hyper kinetic pistons..wtf is thst crap?...you guys are brain washed by the new crowd..thats fine..
Im laughing pretty good.
Im laughing pretty good.
Brainwashed? I'm 52, my first car was a 70 Charger R/T with a 440. I prefer my "fun" cars to be old-school carbureted muscle, but just because I like it doesn't make it better. The advantages of modern technology are undeniable. EFI is the best of all worlds; power, reliability, and economy. You can idle smoothly, have good manners, and make 500 hp at 7,000 rpm. What used to be guarded race sectrets (multi-angle back cut valves, split cams, etc) are now commonly used techniques.
For the 2k fuel injection and a few cpmputer chips cost...Ill be sporting a nice forged power plant with a nice dyers blower sticking through the hood.trick parts like your ls just get you a lighter wallet..I dont buy any new junk from GM...todays car companies are all about greed...not QUALITY products..take that to the bank!

I'm not sure what a "forged power plant" is, exactly, or how you get one using cast iron parts, but you clearly have no idea what things cost or how little $2K actually buys.
So let me get this straight. You don't like edelbrocks because they don't benefit nothing, you don't like modern technology, How the hell do you post on here with out a computer ? The fact you communicate with thousands of people across the us. and world should tell you how far technology has come and that it is a good thing. You must still have a bomb shelter I assume.
Ask any current toyota or Honda owner if they would go back to gm..ford..or chrysler.Search american parts content and see thst camry and accord have more american sourced parts than the mexican cars /parts stamped gm.
So let me get this straight. You don't like edelbrocks because they don't benefit nothing, you don't like modern technology, How the hell do you post on here with out a computer ? The fact you communicate with thousands of people across the us. and world should tell you how far technology has come and that it is a good thing. You must still have a bomb shelter I assume.
I'd rather pay a local machinist to modify the factory parts I already own...than buy over priced state of the art tech.
I.dont mind a company making a profit..they do employ american workers..but spending 2k on a few wires and computer chips...no thanks..map sensor $70...the size of a cracker jack prize made in china for 5 cents?
I'd rather pay a local machinist to modify the factory parts I already own...than buy over priced state of the art tech.
I'd rather pay a local machinist to modify the factory parts I already own...than buy over priced state of the art tech.
You stated this,
"but spending 2k on a few wires and computer chips..." Do you own a television? Obviously a computer, and your beloved Hondas, guess what, they depend on that to do their job. Your posts make zero sense and are indefensible using logic.
What does this have to do with anything? Those same Hondas and Toyotas (fine vehicles, BTW) use the modern technology that you are railing against.
Im ranting about the cost and value per dollar spent.I realize regulations dictate the use of aluminum light weight parts.why does everyone just follow the piper? The carb is an extraordinary machine...runs fine if you dont mess with it...so it gets slightly less mpg...your going to have to buy thousands of gallons of fuel to recoup the investment in fi.2k better get me some noticeable hp increase..not just a slight improvement.trouble shooting all the electronics today is silly..computer fsults a sensor...when replaced..faults some other code..one expensive sensor after another...by the way..picked up a olds
performer rpm msnifolf for $50 today...want to swap from quadrajet to holley.
performer rpm msnifolf for $50 today...want to swap from quadrajet to holley.
please view the 2 cylinder heads. the one on the right is Brad Wise design. A little bit different from the GM engineers that designed the factory heads many moons ago. The one on the left I think is rocket racing (not sure) so don't rip me for it. I took this shot at Brad's shop. anyone looking at olds heads should talk to Brad and seriously consider these.
check out the head on the right. this is Brad Wise performance heads for sb & bb olds. I think the one on the left is a rocket head. The Wise head just seems to make more sense with the plug location and the efficient looking chamber flow.
I.dont mind a company making a profit..they do employ american workers..but spending 2k on a few wires and computer chips...no thanks..map sensor $70...the size of a cracker jack prize made in china for 5 cents?
I'd rather pay a local machinist to modify the factory parts I already own...than buy over priced state of the art tech.
I'd rather pay a local machinist to modify the factory parts I already own...than buy over priced state of the art tech.
By the time the part is installed in your car it's passed thru several companies. BTW. We sell to all the automotive manufacturers in different form factors so your toy, Honda, Kia, GM, sube etc may use all many or several sensors from the same US ( for now) company
All that said the average semiconductor life span is on the order of 10 years or so.....so if your newer car is more than 10 years old, you can reasonably expect to see some failures, if its 20 years old you may be SOL on replacement parts. The 20 year SOL may not realistically be an issue for another 5-10 years based on the increasing numbers of semiconductors used for things like current sensing, LEDs, motor drivers, and hall sensors!
Last edited by RetroRanger; Jun 21, 2013 at 07:52 AM.
Im ranting about the cost and value per dollar spent.I realize regulations dictate the use of aluminum light weight parts.why does everyone just follow the piper? The carb is an extraordinary machine...runs fine if you dont mess with it...so it gets slightly less mpg...your going to have to buy thousands of gallons of fuel to recoup the investment in fi.2k better get me some noticeable hp increase..not just a slight improvement.trouble shooting all the electronics today is silly..computer fsults a sensor...when replaced..faults some other code..one expensive sensor after another...by the way..picked up a olds
performer rpm msnifolf for $50 today...want to swap from quadrajet to holley.
performer rpm msnifolf for $50 today...want to swap from quadrajet to holley.The cost effectiveness is the primary arguement FOR the Pro Comps. By the time you get factory iron to flow as well, it will cost you more, will be heavier, won't have as good a chamber, etc.
Carbs are fine, ever flood a car on a cold morning? After it does start you need to let it warm up. Not with EFI. I'm not sure where you keep coming up with these numbers and prices. I never said that converting an old-school engine to EFI was cost effective. I did say that modern computer controlled EFI systems are better.
Actually, it sort of IS true, however Nasty has somewhat garbled the facts.
The metric that's published is North American content, which includes Canada and Mexico. It also varies by model year, obviously. For the 2012 model year, the vehicle sold in the US with the highest North American content was the Toyota Matrix, interestingly built at the old NUMMI plant, which is the former Fremont plant. Number two is the Toyota Avalon. The GM full size vans (Express and Savana) are next, followed by the (Canandian-built) Impala, Sienna, Accord, and Crosstour.
http://www.autoweek.com/car-shopping...n-america.html
The metric that's published is North American content, which includes Canada and Mexico. It also varies by model year, obviously. For the 2012 model year, the vehicle sold in the US with the highest North American content was the Toyota Matrix, interestingly built at the old NUMMI plant, which is the former Fremont plant. Number two is the Toyota Avalon. The GM full size vans (Express and Savana) are next, followed by the (Canandian-built) Impala, Sienna, Accord, and Crosstour.
http://www.autoweek.com/car-shopping...n-america.html
I found this..
http://kogodnow.com/autoindex/
http://kogodnow.com/autoindex/
Actually, it sort of IS true, however Nasty has somewhat garbled the facts.
The metric that's published is North American content, which includes Canada and Mexico. It also varies by model year, obviously. For the 2012 model year, the vehicle sold in the US with the highest North American content was the Toyota Matrix, interestingly built at the old NUMMI plant, which is the former Fremont plant. Number two is the Toyota Avalon. The GM full size vans (Express and Savana) are next, followed by the (Canandian-built) Impala, Sienna, Accord, and Crosstour.
http://www.autoweek.com/car-shopping...n-america.html
The metric that's published is North American content, which includes Canada and Mexico. It also varies by model year, obviously. For the 2012 model year, the vehicle sold in the US with the highest North American content was the Toyota Matrix, interestingly built at the old NUMMI plant, which is the former Fremont plant. Number two is the Toyota Avalon. The GM full size vans (Express and Savana) are next, followed by the (Canandian-built) Impala, Sienna, Accord, and Crosstour.
http://www.autoweek.com/car-shopping...n-america.html
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



