General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

Pitman arm question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 07:13 PM
  #1  
Napoleon1991's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 248
From: Wheaton, IL
Pitman arm question

Hi, is this gap between the pitman arm and the steering box normal? It seems pretty big and not the entire width of the steering box splines are in contact with the pitman arm. Thanks in advance for any help. (sorry about the sideways pic)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
photo.jpg (40.2 KB, 36 views)
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 07:38 PM
  #2  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Napoleon1991
Hi, is this gap between the pitman arm and the steering box normal?
Yes.

- Eric
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 07:52 PM
  #3  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
It won't fall off if that's what you're worried about. That nut is torqued to somewhere around 180 ft/lbs if memory serves.
Old Sep 16, 2013 | 09:54 PM
  #4  
Napoleon1991's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 248
From: Wheaton, IL
The nut was hand tight so i torqued it down to 100 ft lbs (according to chiltons). Should i torque it all the way to 180?
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 02:56 AM
  #5  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Why would you rely on Chilton's for information?

The CSM says 150 ft/lbs.

- Eric
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 07:18 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
To the O.P.'s original question, the splines on the steering box are tapered, so the pitman arm only goes on until it wedges on the tapered splines, then stops. The gap is irrelevant.
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 08:58 AM
  #7  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Why would you rely on Chilton's for information?

The CSM says 150 ft/lbs.

- Eric
Double check that Eric, I thought your number was low so I checked the 69 CSM and the Pitman shaft nut is supposed to be between 180 and 210 ft/lbs whether PS or manual steering. See page 9-36 of the 69 CSM? Where in the CSM did you find the 150 number? Maybe I'm missing something.
Old Sep 17, 2013 | 09:25 AM
  #8  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Ha. Figures.

I found my number in the '68 CSM under Torque Values at the end of the Steering chapter.

Usually these numbers are the same regardless of year, but every now and then you get a wise guy, like the early years low harmonic balancer torques.

I agree you should go with the higher value - since the gear box didn't change, I'd suspect they increased the torque in response to experience in the field.

- Eric
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DaveD65
General Discussion
5
Apr 22, 2014 06:10 PM
KevinBN7
Chassis/Body/Frame
6
Oct 29, 2010 06:35 AM
scrappie
Chassis/Body/Frame
8
Feb 13, 2010 04:41 PM
Brodyvonsickboy
Vintage Oldsmobiles
0
Oct 15, 2009 10:59 AM
J-(Chicago)
Parts Wanted
0
May 29, 2008 04:30 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:47 AM.