General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

OAI W-25 Lower Base??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 30th, 2013, 09:22 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TicTocTach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 162
OAI W-25 Lower Base??

Hey guys does anyone know if the lower base of the air cleaner on a w25 OAI setup is the same as your standard 442 NON OAI????
TicTocTach is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 09:24 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
They are differant. The snorkel is much bigger on the OAI setup. They also have 5 holes drilled in the bottom to let water out if it should get in there.
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 10:28 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
The snorkel on a 442 is the same as a snorkel on a w30,only difference is the drain holes. I have an original 18000, mile untouched car at the shop and it is Identical to the W30 aircleaner except for the holes.

Greg
rcktdoc is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 10:34 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TicTocTach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 162
I dunno greg. Not saying you are wrong and I'm no expert but it seems as though Jensen is right just from what I've seen thus far. There's a few other threads on here with the same question, one with clear as day pictures of the snorkel with a sizable difference. I was looking at one on eBay that was an original off the guys w30 and wasn't sure what the differences were.
TicTocTach is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 11:33 AM
  #5  
MOTORHEAD
 
11971four4two's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: minnesota USA
Posts: 6,747
They also used the wide snorkel air cleaner base on the 4 bbl 70SX cars. Those SX's did not have the 5 drain holes in the bottom like the OAI cars had
11971four4two is online now  
Old November 30th, 2013, 02:09 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
Well I know Im not wrong! Like I said I have an 18,000 mile Original 70 442 at my shop it is probably the best original 70 that I have ever seen. The air cleaner is EXACTLY the same as an OAI except NO holes. The owner wanted to replace it because the original owner replaced the hood with a oai when the car was a couple years old because it didnt have the.drain holes. I matched it up to an oai base I had and it was identical except no drain holes.

Greg

Last edited by rcktdoc; November 30th, 2013 at 02:18 PM.
rcktdoc is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 02:20 PM
  #7  
Moderator
 
2blu442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 13,767
I don't know what is or isn't correct. But to help people in the future could you guys post pictures of what you have? Maybe even some measurements or two air cleaners side by side if you have it?


John
2blu442 is online now  
Old November 30th, 2013, 02:25 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
I cant post pics on here. Besides that Im not going to go tearing apart a customers car just to show pics. Next time I just wont even respond.

Greg
rcktdoc is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 02:47 PM
  #9  
MOTORHEAD
 
11971four4two's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: minnesota USA
Posts: 6,747
righto
11971four4two is online now  
Old November 30th, 2013, 03:06 PM
  #10  
Rodney
 
cdrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,365
I agree with John, such a small thing to get pissed about. Pictures and measurements would definitely help sort this out without the attitude.
Just my 2¢.
cdrod is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 04:13 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
if they are identically the same why would you need measurements?
rcktdoc is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 05:24 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Stefano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Land of Lincoln
Posts: 1,768
I also believe that most were the same as the local Parts Palace would buy up all the standard ones at local swaps drill holes and repaint them and sell as originals.
Stefano is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 05:47 PM
  #13  
MOTORHEAD
 
11971four4two's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: minnesota USA
Posts: 6,747
that would demean the facts
11971four4two is online now  
Old November 30th, 2013, 06:24 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
brddg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 421
I would like to skip to the end of the book.
brddg is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 06:37 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
Originally Posted by rcktdoc
The snorkel on a 442 is the same as a snorkel on a w30,only difference is the drain holes. I have an original 18000, mile untouched car at the shop and it is Identical to the W30 aircleaner except for the holes.

Greg
If this is true it could only be in 1970. 71/72 were not. I admit, I only had 2 70 442s and one of them was an original OAI car. The other was missing the air cleaner. other than that all the 70s I had were W-30s. The non OAI 442 in 71 was a dual snorkel and 72 was the standard 4bbl base.
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 07:08 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
I just looked up all 3 years and the 70 442 only does have a separate air cleaner base than an OAI or standard 4bbl. (going by the numbers, there are no pictures) From what you are saying I would assume that this is the big snorkel with no holes and the car you are talking about is a 70. 71/72 are deffinatly not the same snorkel.

edit... I just seen you second post and did say 70
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 07:29 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
brddg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 421
What does the rallye have???
brddg is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 07:31 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
brddg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 421
Are these stamped differently? Big snorkel, small snorkel, holes or no holes? Got my curiosity perked now. Thanks guys, probably won't sleep now...
brddg is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 07:48 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Oldsmomick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 93
OAI Cleaner Base

Some pictures from my base, which is original (as far as I know) to my 1970 4-4-2, factory W-25. Sorry, I don't have a non-oai base with me to compare.
Mick
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
OAI Base #1.jpg (55.1 KB, 110 views)
File Type: jpg
OAI Base #2.jpg (56.1 KB, 106 views)
File Type: jpg
OAI Base #3.jpg (70.5 KB, 95 views)
File Type: jpg
OAI Base #4.jpg (56.6 KB, 105 views)

Last edited by Oldsmomick; November 30th, 2013 at 09:54 PM. Reason: clarification
Oldsmomick is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 09:38 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,192
Non-OAI base for a '70 442 uses the same snorkel as the OAI base but without the hole in the end that Greg mentions. Same length, opening size, etc....they just punched that hole in the end on the OAI applications from what I can tell.

On a '71 non-OAI 442 I believe the snorkel is the same as the OAI snorkel as well (also the same as the OAI/nonOAI '70 442 snorkel) BUT the non-OAI air cleaner bases had an additional shorter/stubbier snorkel on the other side as well.

If you are trying to determine what's "correct" based on "for sale" car ads on the internet you are in for a lifetime of misinformation. It's a common mistake you see on ebay cars, etc....regular non-442 type 4 bbl air cleaner bases on 442s and OAI cars. Lots of "thrown together" cars out there and that's one sign of it....that and many owners just don't know what is correct as that's what was on the car when they bought it.

Last edited by 70Post; November 30th, 2013 at 09:46 PM.
70Post is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 09:38 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,244
My 70 442 non-OAI, 8-18-69 build. Brett
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
photo 3.JPG (99.4 KB, 101 views)
File Type: jpg
photo 4.JPG (97.9 KB, 97 views)
Paladin31 is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 09:47 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,244
71 442 Non-OAI, for comparison purposes. Brett
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
GetAttachment.jpg (9.3 KB, 112 views)
Paladin31 is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 09:51 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,244
Patton, your witness...
Paladin31 is offline  
Old November 30th, 2013, 10:09 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,192
Thank you Counselor Brett.

So.....Mr. TichTochTach, on the night of September 27th, you stated in your deposition that the defendant, Mr. Evilbay, sold you the following OAI items??.......

70Post is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 05:19 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
Originally Posted by 70Post
Non-OAI base for a '70 442 uses the same snorkel as the OAI base but without the hole in the end that Greg mentions. Same length, opening size, etc....they just punched that hole in the end on the OAI applications from what I can tell.
.
We were talking about the 5 holes at the bottom, The one at the end of the snorkel I forgot about. Both of these could be had with or without that hole. That hole at the end of the snorkel is for california emissions. SOME but not all cars outside California got the base with this hole but still did not get the California emissions (35NA9). The parts book does not show the base with the hole (that I can find). I assume that they only carried the non California emission base and had to drill the holl if in California? The assembly manual shows a number for 35NA9 and without 35NA9. This hole is a little off topic but still related.
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 05:33 AM
  #26  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
All the oai bases Ive had and seen have had the hole at the end under the snorkle. Im not talking 1 or 2 I have owned 35 W cars and had qwite a few oai bases. The repro base doesnt neither does the 442 base. And no I dont have pictures. I should clarify that Im speaking of 70 cars.

Greg

Last edited by rcktdoc; December 1st, 2013 at 06:12 AM.
rcktdoc is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 05:39 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
Both of there came from W-30 cars.

100_6539.jpg?t=1271117412
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 05:51 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
The one on the right has been painted,the one on the left looks original Paint. Do you know for a fact the repainted base is the one that came with the car originaly? Not trying to be an *** just trying to get a point across that in 40 plus years lots of things can change. I have worked on and owned these cars since they were new at the dealers. I have bought,sold,restored and parted out so many of these cars I have lost count. Not saying I know everything No one does, Just saying I have a little bit of experiance.

Greg
rcktdoc is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 06:16 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
Originally Posted by rcktdoc
Not saying I know everything No one does, Just saying I have a little bit of experiance.

Greg
As do I. I have seen many original W-30s that did not have the hole. I have seen more Rallye 350s and W-31s that had the hole than W-30s. The hole was random outside of California.

Both of the above based were punched and not drilled.

EDIT... I mispoke on the picture. The one with the hole came from a Rallye 350 and Not a W-30. Same base but don't want to mislead.

Last edited by jensenracing77; December 1st, 2013 at 06:20 AM.
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 07:11 AM
  #30  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
69 442 air cleaner bases are the same also,just missing the extra side hole for the valve cover breather. With the right tools the drain holes can be punched and look like factory. Like Stefano said there is a place around the Chicago area that modifies regular 442 air cleaners and then passes them off as Real oai. Not saying you didnt have any experiance,just stateing that Ive been involved with these cars since they were New.

Greg
rcktdoc is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 10:06 AM
  #31  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TicTocTach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 162
......

Yikes!! What a mess I started here. Lol. I didn't mean to get anyone's panties in a bunch as it seems there are a bunch of opinions here. At this point for me I'm asking a bunch of questions before I purchase anything that has be repoped or could possibly be fake after this whole situation I just went through with the re-stamped w30 carb I was told was original and real. I value everyone's opinion as I'm still learning here and restoring my car as close to original as I can. Everyone here is all out to do the same thing I feel. Help each other out. That's what I appreciate so again I hope I didn't get anyone too twisted up. on the other side.... I found these pics on another thread that basically started with the same question. This is what threw me to the fact that the w-25 lower was substantially larger. Is it possible the standard 442 that was purchased with the w25 option got the standard 442 base and the cars purchased with the complete w30 package because it was a "blue printed hi-po" motor came with this larger base????
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (26.5 KB, 92 views)
TicTocTach is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 10:07 AM
  #32  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TicTocTach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 162
.....

2nd pic
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (26.5 KB, 75 views)
TicTocTach is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 10:09 AM
  #33  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
TicTocTach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 162
......

Sorry here's the other pic
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
image.jpg (23.0 KB, 72 views)
TicTocTach is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 10:33 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
davebw31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: crawfordville, florida
Posts: 857
ALL 70' OAI bases had the N9 option sensor hole "punched" in the opening of the snorkel. PERIOD! Olds would not have some with N9 hole and some without for 70' model OAI W cars. That would just complicate the building of a W car even more!

An engineering change order was issued just prior to 71' production to the "stamping dept." to not punch the N9 sensor hole as that "operation" was no longer required as the 70' Calif. emissions (evaporator/closed fuel system) was to be installed starting with all 71' models. Early 71' production A body OAI equipped cars got some of the 70' style to exhaust stock of those left over from 70' production stampings. From 70' Oct to mid-Dec there was a mix with and without that hole. Jan. 1971 on and through 72' model run I never saw an N9 hole in the snorkel opening.

Last edited by davebw31; December 1st, 2013 at 10:39 AM.
davebw31 is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 11:29 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
rcktdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northern IL
Posts: 2,494
Originally Posted by davebw31
ALL 70' OAI bases had the N9 option sensor hole "punched" in the opening of the snorkel. PERIOD! Olds would not have some with N9 hole and some without for 70' model OAI W cars. That would just complicate the building of a W car even more!

An engineering change order was issued just prior to 71' production to the "stamping dept." to not punch the N9 sensor hole as that "operation" was no longer required as the 70' Calif. emissions (evaporator/closed fuel system) was to be installed starting with all 71' models. Early 71' production A body OAI equipped cars got some of the 70' style to exhaust stock of those left over from 70' production stampings. From 70' Oct to mid-Dec there was a mix with and without that hole. Jan. 1971 on and through 72' model run I never saw an N9 hole in the snorkel opening.
Dave thats what I was going to suggest because all the 70s Ive owned and seen have had the punch hole.

Greg
rcktdoc is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 12:55 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,192
Originally Posted by rcktdoc
Dave thats what I was going to suggest because all the 70s Ive owned and seen have had the punch hole.

Greg
Same experience here with numerous '70 W cars...all had the hole in the end of the snorkel and were not CA emissions cars.

WTH!!!......go over to the Pontiac and other Abody boards (Mopar as well)...this stuff is no different than what they've been "arguing" about/discussing for years...minor differences in each model, model year, parts, etc of their cars. Besides, Olds people need stuff like this to "argue" about just like the other brands have.

Last edited by 70Post; December 1st, 2013 at 01:00 PM.
70Post is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 01:07 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,192
Originally Posted by TicTocTach
Yikes!! What a mess I started here......... This is what threw me to the fact that the w-25 lower was substantially larger. Is it possible the standard 442 that was purchased with the w25 option got the standard 442 base and the cars purchased with the complete w30 package because it was a "blue printed hi-po" motor came with this larger base????
You're continuing the "mess" with statements like the above quote

In 1970 (for purposes of this discussion I'll limit it to that) the bases on a non-OAI 442 and OAI car (both W and Non-W) WERE THE SAME THING dimensionally, size, etc. There is no "larger" base or "smaller" base when it comes to comparing the two...they both used THE SAME BASE/metal part (other than the drain holes and CA emissions snorkel hole).

The 3 pics you posted above are a comparison b/n 442 (OAI/Non-OAI) air cleaner snorkels and NON-442 4 bbl snorkels. Pics were taken here and that's my "Appliance Austin" yellow magnetic ruler......I need to go get that damn thing back from the guy that took the pics!! It does nothing but cause confusion each time it appears in a picture on the 'Net

Last edited by 70Post; December 1st, 2013 at 02:09 PM.
70Post is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 01:43 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
davebw31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: crawfordville, florida
Posts: 857
joe, that post verifies my post! At no time did I see (and I saw a lot of OAI W-cars as they caught my attention) a 70' model OAI W car without the N9 hole punched in the snorkel. Maybe a W-25 optioned 70', but not a W-machine. I doubt it! joe this time you are wrong.
davebw31 is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 02:39 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
How can he be wrong if it still has the date stamp?
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old December 1st, 2013, 02:44 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,515
I have a better one... I just so happen to have a 343 69 also and Mine does have the hole. Here are two made the same day, One with and one without and both from W cars.
jensenracing77 is offline  


Quick Reply: OAI W-25 Lower Base??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:28 AM.