General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

What's the deal about 1969???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 26th, 2010, 12:30 PM
  #1  
restoration finished!
Thread Starter
 
69cutlassragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 24
What's the deal about 1969???

I have a '69 Cutlass convertible that needs TLC. It seems that parts are much more readily available for other years. There also doesn't appear to be much info available about production numbers, etc. 1969 front bumpers are almost non-existant! So, Is it jusy my bad luck, lack of skills, or is 1969 somewhat of an odd year for Cutlass and 442s???
69cutlassragtop is offline  
Old August 26th, 2010, 12:32 PM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Jamesbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 17,731
It's the greatest year of all but some parts are harder to find. Make a list and put it in the parts wanted section. I may have some of what your loooking for.
Jamesbo is offline  
Old August 26th, 2010, 01:22 PM
  #3  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,229
The 1970-72 cars are more popular, thus there are more repro parts for them. In addition, there was a lot of commonality between the 70-72 cars for body parts. In other years, most of the body parts were one-year-only.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old August 26th, 2010, 01:26 PM
  #4  
STOP call'n it a Chevelle
 
arodenhiser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Binbrook, Ontario
Posts: 704
'69 bad? '68 seems worse to me. But then again I have a '68 so I am biased.

Adam
arodenhiser is offline  
Old August 26th, 2010, 04:15 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
GoodOldsGuyDougie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 686
I believe the 69 and 70 front Bumper are the same, but thats about it.
GoodOldsGuyDougie is offline  
Old August 26th, 2010, 08:36 PM
  #6  
Oldsdruid
 
rocketraider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southside Vajenya
Posts: 10,534
The 68 is worse to find anything for without breaking the bank.

1969 was one of GM's absolute best years. It was one of those years every Division had it all together- styling, performance, affordability and reliability. Any kid bagging groceries could afford to buy and insure a GM car and look good while doing it.
Coincidentally 1969 was one of the last years before government meddling took hold in the car industry.
rocketraider is online now  
Old August 26th, 2010, 09:10 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
70Post's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 3,244
Originally Posted by GoodOldsGuyDougie
I believe the 69 and 70 front Bumper are the same, but thats about it.

Nope----unique to the '69....yet another part that is going to be harder to find.
70Post is offline  
Old August 26th, 2010, 09:12 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
442much's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 2,623
Try getting parts for a 73-77. Some parts are just now becoming available. Before now it's been junkyards and parts cars for eveything except drivetrain.
442much is offline  
Old August 26th, 2010, 11:50 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Bluevista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 4,430
My 1968 goat is way harder to find anything for than any GTO before or after except maybe the 70's models nobody wants.
It was a transition year from the old body style and they still used a lot of the earlier interior parts, in '69 plastic started taking over big time and little to nothing interchanges, thankfully. I don't know how '68-'69 A body Olds interiors are but the '68 goat looks like an old car inside and has some class, the '69's look like plastic.
Bluevista is offline  
Old August 27th, 2010, 02:59 AM
  #10  
restoration finished!
Thread Starter
 
69cutlassragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Maine
Posts: 24
Thanks for the replies guys! I'm a fan of 1969 models of all GM cars. It was a great year. I'm curious about production numbers. How 1969 compares to other A body (68-72) years. I have found numbers for 442, but not for Cutlass. My engine is in the shop now for a complete rebuild. I'm looking forward to a few rides before the snow flies.
69cutlassragtop is offline  
Old August 27th, 2010, 02:55 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
GoodOldsGuyDougie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 686
Damn I didnt know that. They look very similar!

I would love to see the 2 side by side.

Last edited by GoodOldsGuyDougie; August 30th, 2010 at 03:12 PM.
GoodOldsGuyDougie is offline  
Old August 27th, 2010, 03:04 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Aron Nance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 1,565
Xs3 on the hard to get parts = '68! Now, try and find a rear driver's 1/4 on a Longtop wagon...........ain't there. Always felt the '68 series was sort of like a red-headed step child...........
Aron Nance is offline  
Old August 27th, 2010, 03:21 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,432
Originally Posted by 69cutlassragtop
I'm curious about production numbers. How 1969 compares to other A body (68-72) years.
1968: 336,427
1969: 299,350
1970: 310,273
1971: 264,091
1972: 334,582


The above include all Cutlass production, including those made in Canada, as well as anything that looked like a Cutlass (F-85, 442, and wagons).

I think 1971 was unusually low because that was the big GM strike year that began towards the end of 1970 (when 1970 model year production would have been getting underway), extended into 1971, and is actually the reason that the A-body restyling that took place in 1973 didn't take place in 1972 as originally planned (one year after the B/C body restyling). We actually have that strike to thank for the extra year of "collectible" Cutlasses, including an extra year of Cutlass convertibles. That's also the reason that the '72s did not differ much from the '71s.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old August 31st, 2010, 05:29 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
GoodOldsGuyDougie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 686
Can anyone post the front Bumper of the 69 and 70? Thanks
GoodOldsGuyDougie is offline  
Old August 31st, 2010, 05:34 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,432
Just do a google image search. You'll get 'em by the dozens!


1969:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&s...smobi&gs_rfai=


1970:

http://www.google.com/images?hl=en&b...=&oq=&gs_rfai=
jaunty75 is offline  
Old August 31st, 2010, 06:30 PM
  #16  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,229
And from those links, here's 1969:



Here's 1970:



Note how the 1970 bumper drops down below the grilles. The center tooth doesn't stick up as far, either.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old September 1st, 2010, 04:57 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
GoodOldsGuyDougie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 686
yeah thats it. its just a little different. Thanks guys. I love that 70
GoodOldsGuyDougie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mochi
Major Builds & Projects
27
November 14th, 2010 10:45 AM
derek nesdoly
442
27
April 29th, 2009 06:46 PM
pillagingpiper
Eighty-Eight
12
August 23rd, 2008 01:00 PM
RalphCutlass
Cutlass
2
September 12th, 2007 10:14 AM
robertj66
Eighty-Eight
4
September 4th, 2007 06:27 PM



Quick Reply: What's the deal about 1969???



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:09 AM.