General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

th350 or 700r4?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 13th, 2014, 07:07 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Big Leche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 69
th350 or 700r4?

My th-350 is going out....should I rebuild it and install 3:42 gears and torque convertor...or install a 700-r4?...they cost about the same...I was just wondering which way will give me more "performance" in my situation. I have a stock 350/350 combo with 10 bolt posi.....I figure rebuilding 350 is 300, gears 200, and torque convertor 175. 700 would be 650 to rebuild, then 100 for drive shaft, 100 for misc cables and brackets...any thoughts are definitely appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Big Leche is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 05:57 AM
  #2  
71 cutlass convertible
 
lshlsh2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Trappe, MD
Posts: 2,059
I would consider a 200-r4 also. Same length as a 350, better first gear than a 700 and won't need an adapater plate to hook-up to your engine. It will have to be built up to survive behind your engine. This is the way I'm going to go when the funds and time come. my.02
There are a bunch of threads on this conversion on this site.

Larry
lshlsh2 is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 07:13 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
hookem horns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 878
What are your plans for the car and what gears are in it now? Since you already have a TH350, a rebuild and 3:42 gears will work well for most streed use and be most cost effective. Especially if keeping the 350 engine. An OD tranny like the 200-R mentioned above would be nice if you do a lot of highway driving or the car is your daily driver.
hookem horns is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 07:31 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Professur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mo-Ray-Al, K-Bec.
Posts: 1,815
The 4th gear of the 700 is only useful if you can get into it. Otherwise you're dragging around useless weight. If most of your driving is city, that's wasted gas. I thought I was being clever when the 200c under my Parisienne started bleeding and found myself a 200-4r to rebuild. But when I later sat and did the math, unless I changed out the rear end, I'd need to be doing 80+mph to get into 4th. Even if I was doing mostly highway, it still wasn't going to work.

The 700-r4 is one of the heaviest rotational mass transmissions. It will cost you a few ponies at the rear wheels. The 200-4r is much lighter. The 200-4r can be built to handle as much power as a stock 700 ... but the same effort applied to the 700 makes it even stronger still. Since you're already open to swapping out the rear end ... take the time to do all the math; don't rely on opinion. Work out just what ratios you'd have at the rear wheels for the various combinations ... work out just what use, if any, the 4th gear would give you.
Professur is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 10:54 AM
  #5  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,268
Originally Posted by Big Leche
My th-350 is going out....should I rebuild it and install 3:42 gears and torque convertor...or install a 700-r4?...they cost about the same...I was just wondering which way will give me more "performance" in my situation. I have a stock 350/350 combo with 10 bolt posi.....I figure rebuilding 350 is 300, gears 200, and torque convertor 175. 700 would be 650 to rebuild, then 100 for drive shaft, 100 for misc cables and brackets...any thoughts are definitely appreciated. Thanks in advance.
For starters, what gears do you have now, and how do you plan to use the car? I'll also suggest a properly built 200-4R. The 0.68 OD in that trans means that 3.91 gears are effectively reduced to 2.66 in fourth. That's a great blend of performance and economy. By the way, if you do have gears in the 3.91-up range, you WILL engage OD around town.

I'll also point out that your prices are optimistic for properly built parts. Expect to pay over $1000 for a good quality 200-4R or 700R4. The 200-4R doesn't need an adapter plate and is ultimately easier to install in a non-Chevy.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old January 14th, 2014, 02:10 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
tmaleck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 331
I have a 700R4 in my 67. It has a 4.10 rear gear. The trans has been built with a 2500 stall, recurved shift governor, shift kit, hydraulic lock up conversion and other durability upgrades. The tires are about 27 inches in diameter.

I get into fourth gear around 35 mph @1400 rpm. O.D. kicks in about 45 mph and 70 MPH on the highway is abouth 2500 RPM. The engine is always in the power band and the car has great city manners now.

I would highly recommend on O.D. swap, 700 or 200 based is your call. I got my car with the 700 already swapped in, so I just made it work right. For sure get a lower rear gear and you'll be very happy. I posted a simple RPM calculator a while back, it may help you decide what you want to go with.

Tim

Originally Posted by Professur
The 4th gear of the 700 is only useful if you can get into it. Otherwise you're dragging around useless weight. If most of your driving is city, that's wasted gas. I thought I was being clever when the 200c under my Parisienne started bleeding and found myself a 200-4r to rebuild. But when I later sat and did the math, unless I changed out the rear end, I'd need to be doing 80+mph to get into 4th. Even if I was doing mostly highway, it still wasn't going to work.

The 700-r4 is one of the heaviest rotational mass transmissions. It will cost you a few ponies at the rear wheels. The 200-4r is much lighter. The 200-4r can be built to handle as much power as a stock 700 ... but the same effort applied to the 700 makes it even stronger still. Since you're already open to swapping out the rear end ... take the time to do all the math; don't rely on opinion. Work out just what ratios you'd have at the rear wheels for the various combinations ... work out just what use, if any, the 4th gear would give you.
tmaleck is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 02:39 PM
  #7  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,268
Originally Posted by tmaleck
I get into fourth gear around 35 mph @1400 rpm. O.D. kicks in about 45 mph
Um, fourth gear is OD. Perhaps you mean the converter locks up at 45 mph?
joe_padavano is online now  
Old January 14th, 2014, 03:05 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Professur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mo-Ray-Al, K-Bec.
Posts: 1,815
4th at 35 .. incredible. With the 2.41 I've got, I'm lucky to stay in 3rd.
Professur is offline  
Old January 15th, 2014, 08:17 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
tmaleck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 331
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Um, fourth gear is OD. Perhaps you mean the converter locks up at 45 mph?
Doh, you're right, I meant lockup.
tmaleck is offline  
Old January 15th, 2014, 09:00 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
cutlassjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 836
I did a 200R4 in my 72' with 3.08 gears. Hits fourth gear around 40 and converter lock up around 45 mph. I can cruise comfortably at 70 at around 2200 rpm. This has to be one of the best upgrades I have ever done.
cutlassjoe is offline  
Old January 15th, 2014, 09:26 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
BlackGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,587
For what it's worth, both of the G-body 442s I've owned -- which have a 3.73 rear end -- shifted into 4th at about 35 mph under light-throttle city driving. Torque converter locks up just over 40 mph and will stay engaged while cruising at 40 mph (unless I lift or brake).

Less relevant is my Ford Crown Vic police interceptor with 3.55 rear end. It, too, shifts into 4th at about 35 mph and will cruise with the converter locked up at 40 mph.

So my point is that a 4th gear and lock-up converter really is "useful" in city driving (seeing as how 80% of my city driving is at 45 mph). Whether it actually saves any gas in the city is debateable.

That said, I'd prefer a TH350 for both reliability and shift characteristics, unless the car spends a lot of time on the highway.
BlackGold is offline  
Old January 15th, 2014, 12:49 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Koda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 10,960
For what it's worth, my 2.73 geared with a th-350 with a 350 small block (72 Monte) will sit at 2500 at 70 mph, 3500 at 100, and 1500 at 40 in drive. Punch on that car is solidly in the "fun" range, but not awesome. I can image what it could do with lower gearing and an overdrive, though it's too original to mess with.
Koda is online now  
Old January 26th, 2014, 10:14 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Big Leche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 69
Trans Update

I pulled the trans this weekend and actually just decided to rebuild it myself...I purchased a b&m 2000 stall, shift kit, and will be installing 3:42 gears next weekend. Hopefully this will liven the car up a bit compared to a slipping trans and 2:56 gears...ill take some pics and post soon.
Big Leche is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TOONLOVESCHERYL
Cutlass
11
February 4th, 2016 06:30 AM
64starfire
Transmission
6
June 10th, 2009 06:51 AM
projectheaven
Transmission
2
May 18th, 2009 05:20 AM
64starfire
Transmission
1
April 22nd, 2009 01:00 PM
Jolly Green
Transmission
3
February 25th, 2009 07:25 AM



Quick Reply: th350 or 700r4?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:19 AM.