General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

OAI OR RAM AIR??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 10, 2009 | 11:08 PM
  #41  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
I drove in the rain in Washington and Oregon and had no problem ...
Old May 10, 2009 | 11:43 PM
  #42  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,086
From: Too close to Toronto!!
Smile Addendum

1) wolfman-'68 and '69 Delta with force air were W33's, I have never seen one but I would assume that they had a similar set-up to the Toro... 2) anthonyP- I have several sets of 1973 15" bolt-on wheels...
Old Jan 28, 2023 | 07:02 AM
  #43  
GMMechanic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by Bobsw32
Outside air is cooler than under hood air while ram air creates high pressure much like a supercharger..... Now for a quick story....Many years ago I installed a 1970 ram air hood on my 1970 convertible. I was running a high rise intake so I did not use the ram air air cleaner..... I immediately began experiencing over heating with the car at speed (60 Miles per hour)... It would cruise around town all day in 90 degree heat and never overheat........After replacing everything in the cooling system an old timer said just block off the ram air hood and see what happens.......It turns out the ram air hood created sooo much pressure in the engine compartment the air could not get through the radiator..... Lesson learned THOSE HOODS WORK!
Old Jan 28, 2023 | 07:06 AM
  #44  
GMMechanic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 2
Bullshit story. The engine compartment is not air-tight, and any air from the scoops would be able to exit under the car. So there would be no "sooo much pressure in the engine compartment the air could not get through the radiator". Come on, people.
Old Jan 28, 2023 | 07:09 AM
  #45  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,806
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by GMMechanic
Bullshit story. The engine compartment is not air-tight, and any air from the scoops would be able to exit under the car. So there would be no "sooo much pressure in the engine compartment the air could not get through the radiator". Come on, people.
You do realize this thread has been dead for 14 years, right?
Old Jan 29, 2023 | 07:17 PM
  #46  
Factoryhotrod's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 153
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
In 66, the air intake "bezels" in cooling slots in the bumper fed the "ducts" behind the bumper. Not under the bumper until 68. The 66 factory W30s window stickers called it Force-Air Induction, and GMPD used O.A.I. or outside air induction. The six-page instruction sheets in 66 called it Outside Air Induction system. The Olds letter (June 3, 1966) from G. A. Hirshman, Asst Admin. Engineer to W. E. Dismuke of NHRA began: "Oldsmobile has released an induction forced air system for its 1966 4-4-2 models (W30 option)." the letter then went on to describe engine, induction, battery, and rear axle changes pertinent to the W30 option. As noted above in this thread, Olds did not use the "ram air" term. Olds also did not use the Pontiac "Tri-power" term, rather "Tri-Carbs" was used for the three two-barrel carb option in 66.
Thanks for posting. I was hoping someone would correct that misinformation where the 66 “bezels” were located.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chevymarv
442
11
Mar 28, 2019 02:32 PM
Bernhard
Racing and High Performance
10
Apr 27, 2013 10:54 PM
milehigh
Parts For Sale
1
Sep 17, 2012 08:11 PM
69CutlassAlex
General Discussion
14
Nov 23, 2011 08:49 AM
DennisG.
Parts For Sale
2
Feb 7, 2008 04:46 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:51 AM.