General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

New Arrival 72 442 Not Mine

Old Jan 21, 2014 | 10:31 AM
  #1  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
New Arrival 72 442 Not Mine

Since I eat sleep and breath Oldsmobiles I thought I would post some picts of my brother's new ride. He has been searching for about a year for a stick 70-72 442 with 71 his favorite year. Wow seems the prices are really up there for these cars! He finally pulled the trigger on this 72 3 speed stick floor shift. It is said to have 58,000 original miles and has been repainted in the original color. W25 and rear wing are factory items but were added. The original check list dated march 72 came with the car. Among other things the car was ordered with a posi, 8 track, buckets but no console. It is code 56 yellow with black interior and vinyl top and has no AC. He was disappointed in the 350 engine and lack of cutout rear bumper but thought it was fairly priced. It is pretty clean.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 02:54 PM
  #2  
Dave Siltman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,412
From: maryland
Neat car. The bumper is in fact correct even though he may not like it. The 3-speed is a rare bird. I like it!!!
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 02:59 PM
  #3  
ScottoW31's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 249
From: Michigan
Nice.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 03:14 PM
  #4  
vette442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,790
From: McMurray, PA
Nice car! Manual trans, rallye pack, non-A/C car. What's not to like?

The 3 speed stick is pretty fun to drive - I had a '68 post coupe with that setup.

He'll be itching for nice weather to arrive.

Terry
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 03:33 PM
  #5  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Does anyone know if the little lamp on top of the dash is factory? I think it says fasten seat belts... I will tell my brother the car is getting some praise. Thanks guys.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 03:44 PM
  #6  
ent72olds's Avatar
Registered Luser
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,785
From: LI,NY
Nice ride!
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 03:48 PM
  #7  
RetroRanger's Avatar
72 Olds CS
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
yeah the 72s built in 72 had the fasten belt lights, my late 71 built car did not have it
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 04:04 PM
  #8  
oldspackrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,859
From: Indianapolis
Those "Fasten seat belt" lights on top of the dash only came on late '72 cars that had the Rally pack(Tach & gauges). If you did not have the Rally pack, the "Fsb" was in the bottom of the fuel gauge pod.
I have two early '72 cars, both built before 1-1-72, both with rally pack, & both have the wiring for that light, but neither has the light.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 04:10 PM
  #9  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Originally Posted by oldspackrat
Those "Fasten seat belt" lights on top of the dash only came on late '72 cars that had the Rally pack(Tach & gauges). If you did not have the Rally pack, the "Fsb" was in the bottom of the fuel gauge pod.
I have two early '72 cars, both built before 1-1-72, both with rally pack, & both have the wiring for that light, but neither has the light.
Good info, I dont recall ever seeing this light before, this car was ordered in March of 72 and delivered in April.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 04:36 PM
  #10  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Does anyone know if the little lamp on top of the dash is factory? I think it says fasten seat belts... I will tell my brother the car is getting some praise. Thanks guys.
The FSB light light pod is correct, and as mentioned it's only for factory equipped rallye pac cars produced after Jan 1, 1972. The FSB warning is as Scot says for non U21 and U21 cars. The SB warning was legislated and supposed to be implemented and conspicuously visible/audible for cars produced after Jan 1972. As with all transitions though there will be some 72's produced in early Jan that won't have the FSB pod on the dash. That pod on the dash is also the same for the wagons; only the lens will say 'Tailgate Ajar'

The car looks really nice, has some very nice options and the stripes are correct W29 ones. The original hood for the car would also have blacked out 'faux louvers'. If your brother ever finds a broadcast card for this car it should show the W29 option in Box 12 under the heading "COPO & SO". If it came with the 350, check the VIN to see if it starts out 3G87J , or 3G87M. Both of those (2bbl and 4bbl) were true N10 turned down dual exhaust under rear bumper.

I'd be curious to know if his VIN is close to mine which was produced in early April of 1972. My last 6 VIN digits are 208783 and body number on the cowl tag is 442325.

Last edited by Allan R; Jan 21, 2014 at 05:23 PM. Reason: remove incorrect stmt, install correct one
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 04:38 PM
  #11  
kjr442's Avatar
Kjr442
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,817
From: Texas
Good looking car.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 04:39 PM
  #12  
GAOldsman's Avatar
"Car"mudgeon
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,191
From: Perry, GA
Very nice Congrats on his purchase Sounds like a nice ride.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 04:55 PM
  #13  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Thanks again everyone, but blacked out tail light lens factory?? Wow shows you how much I know... I can get the vin this weekend. Only thing he has is the GM order sheet where you can check boxes for the options... The guy went for a tape player but only an AM radio...
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 05:14 PM
  #14  
vette442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,790
From: McMurray, PA
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Thanks again everyone, but blacked out tail light lens factory?? Wow shows you how much I know...
Your knowledge is okay. No taillight lenses were blacked out in '72 except for the Hurst/Olds. Your brother's lights should have silver trim.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 05:21 PM
  #15  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by vette442
Your knowledge is okay. No taillight lenses were blacked out in '72 except for the Hurst/Olds. Your brother's lights should have silver trim.
Hmmm, ya never had kids with spray paint living near ya did ya? Yes, you're right. I'll fix that. If it still retained the OEM hood with Faux louvers, THEY would be blacked out.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 08:51 PM
  #16  
nj_cutlass72's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 754
John's a lucky guy! Sweet ride...
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 07:30 AM
  #17  
kjr442's Avatar
Kjr442
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,817
From: Texas
Originally Posted by Allan R
Hmmm, ya never had kids with spray paint living near ya did ya? Yes, you're right. I'll fix that. If it still retained the OEM hood with Faux louvers, THEY would be blacked out.
Allan I didn't know that about the louvers, is that just in the 72 442?
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 11:03 AM
  #18  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Kevin, the W29 option wasn't available until the 72 model year so yup, it would only be that year far as I know. The non W29 cars with faux louvers came with the louvers matching the lower body color accented by the silver reveal trim.
Old Jan 23, 2014 | 05:35 AM
  #19  
DENT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 978
From: Tillsonburg Ont. Canada.
Good looking Olds , I do like the colour .
Old Jan 23, 2014 | 05:54 AM
  #20  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Originally Posted by dent
good looking olds , i do like the colour .
nice!
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 04:04 PM
  #21  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
The vin is 3G87M2M212321 and here are some pictures of the order sheet. Is it possible to tell what gear is in the rear from this?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
zzzz72.jpg (80.2 KB, 55 views)
File Type: jpg
zzzz722.jpg (92.4 KB, 48 views)
File Type: jpg
zzzz7222.jpg (68.4 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg
zzzz72222.jpg (84.3 KB, 42 views)

Last edited by Oldsmaniac; Jan 26, 2014 at 04:05 PM. Reason: more info
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 05:36 PM
  #22  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,479
From: Muskegon, Mi.
Well, the gear ratios are listed on the sheet, but none are checked. I am not sure if there was a standard default gear or not. I think that you'll have to see what is stamped on the axle tube.

Last edited by 1969w3155; Jan 27, 2014 at 07:54 AM.
Old Jan 26, 2014 | 05:46 PM
  #23  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,479
From: Muskegon, Mi.
3.23's appear to be the std gear ratio per page 152 of Olds 442 & W-Machines Resto Guide.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 05:17 AM
  #24  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Originally Posted by 1969w3155
3.23's appear to be the std gear ratio per page 152 of Olds 442 & W-Machines Resto Guide.
Thanks, will have to look for code on axle tube as soon as this severe cold lets up.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 06:34 AM
  #25  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by 1969w3155
3.23's appear to be the std gear ratio per page 152 of Olds 442 & W-Machines Resto Guide.
That should be a page from the SPECS booklet.
http://wildaboutcarsonline.com/cgi-b...aldisplayed=50

I'd hate to send anyone to Olds 442 & W-Machines Resto Guide, as full of errors as it is.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 06:35 AM
  #26  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Joe, that should originally be a column shift 3-spd that was converted to a floor shift.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 07:25 AM
  #27  
GAOldsman's Avatar
"Car"mudgeon
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,191
From: Perry, GA
Yep RPO W39 in 1972 would give the 3 speed a floor shifter.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 07:40 AM
  #28  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
If I read correctly M15 (3 spd manual) was checked and also W29. As part of the 442 package (W29) you got W39 which would be a floor shifted trans?
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 07:57 AM
  #29  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,479
From: Muskegon, Mi.
I'd hate to send anyone to Olds 442 & W-Machines Resto Guide, as full of errors as it is.
yes it is, but that page looks to be copied from original sources.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 08:40 AM
  #30  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
If I read correctly M15 (3 spd manual) was checked and also W29. As part of the 442 package (W29) you got W39 which would be a floor shifted trans?
Nope. That's why it is called an "Appearance and Handling Package". It has *nothing* to do with the drivetrain.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 03:18 PM
  #31  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Originally Posted by wmachine
Joe, that should originally be a column shift 3-spd that was converted to a floor shift.
Have to back up here. Kurt are you saying this car came with a column shifted 3 spd manual trans and someone converted it to a floor shift? I know in 72 the 442 was an option on a Cutlass and not a model. You got the appearance package when you ordered W29.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 03:52 PM
  #32  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
The vin is 3G87M2M212321 and here are some pictures of the order sheet. Is it possible to tell what gear is in the rear from this?
Wow! That is fairly close to the VIN sequence on my car. Likely it was built the week after mine. Is the cowl tag build code 04A or 04B?

Thank you so much for posting pics of that dealer working copy order. Is it a special size or just 81/2 x 11? It's the first one of these working copies I've seen.

It's weird that the F41 suspension is checked off when the W29 option has also been.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 04:03 PM
  #33  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Allan R
Wow! That is fairly close to the VIN sequence on my car. Likely it was built the week after mine. Is the cowl tag build code 04A or 04B?

Thank you so much for posting pics of that dealer working copy order. Is it a special size or just 81/2 x 11? It's the first one of these working copies I've seen.

It's weird that the F41 suspension is checked off when the W29 option has also been.
The order sheet is 8 1/2 x 14. Yes I did notice the suspension for trailering was checked off strange... maybe it included some sort of trailer wiring... dont know. I am not sure about the trim tag... did not look at it last week.
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 08:33 PM
  #34  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
.. maybe it included some sort of trailer wiring... dont know.
That's as good a guess as I can think of. When you get a chance to see the car again, have a look for the wiring pigtail?
Old Jan 27, 2014 | 08:49 PM
  #35  
kjr442's Avatar
Kjr442
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,817
From: Texas
Originally Posted by 1969w3155
3.23's appear to be the std gear ratio per page 152 of Olds 442 & W-Machines Resto Guide.
That's what mine came with.
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 05:19 AM
  #36  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Have to back up here. Kurt are you saying this car came with a column shifted 3 spd manual trans and someone converted it to a floor shift? I know in 72 the 442 was an option on a Cutlass and not a model. You got the appearance package when you ordered W29.
The M15 is checked off. Notice that is no-charge, too. That is the standard trans for the A-bodies: a column shift 3-spd manual.

Bear in mind this is an order sheet. What is on a order sheet does *not* mean for certain that is the way the car came. All you can say is that this is the way the car was ordered.
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 05:28 AM
  #37  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Originally Posted by wmachine
The M15 is checked off. Notice that is no-charge, too. That is the standard trans for the A-bodies: a column shift 3-spd manual.

Bear in mind this is an order sheet. What is on a order sheet does *not* mean for certain that is the way the car came. All you can say is that this is the way the car was ordered.
Agreed but w29 is checked and that says included with M15 would be W39 which is the floor shifted 3 speed and not the standard 3 speed column shift.
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 09:44 AM
  #38  
GAOldsman's Avatar
"Car"mudgeon
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,191
From: Perry, GA
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Agreed but w29 is checked and that says included with M15 would be W39 which is the floor shifted 3 speed and not the standard 3 speed column shift.
Yup you are correct my friend
Old Jan 28, 2014 | 04:05 PM
  #39  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Agreed but w29 is checked and that says included with M15 would be W39 which is the floor shifted 3 speed and not the standard 3 speed column shift.
You are correct. I was thinking the W39 was a shifter and trans option, but it is just a shifter option so it would coexist with the W39. Same transmission, different shifter.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tom442
Cars For Sale
9
Mar 20, 2022 06:20 PM
64-442
Vista Cruiser & Wagons
24
Apr 14, 2017 04:13 PM
4-ever-olds
Cars For Sale
4
Oct 26, 2009 08:07 AM
rallygreen
Cars For Sale
2
Oct 4, 2009 06:21 PM
dan1s
442
0
Jul 25, 2008 05:45 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 PM.