General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Bucket seat seatbelt oddity ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 14th, 2014, 07:07 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VikingBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 483
Bucket seat seatbelt oddity ?

Have a 1970 442 4 speed car with console. Dealer invoice sheet indicates sports console as a factory install.

Just noticed something odd. Retractors with the 'male' belt clip end on the floor by each door, as you would expect.

But each belt with the female end by the console has another strap also with a female end. So there are two sets of two-female connectors, one on each side of the console. (4 total female connectors) in the front.

This wouldn't even make sense if the car had a bench seat at one time since there's still one female connector too many, and one less male end that would be needed.

What gives ?
VikingBlue is offline  
Old October 14th, 2014, 07:26 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
oldspackrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,848
The other two female ends are for the shoulder belts, assuming they are there?
oldspackrat is offline  
Old October 14th, 2014, 07:28 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Koda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 10,539
Those are the buckles for your shoulder straps. Look up above the door, there should be a belt there. If it's gone, someone redid the headliner and the female counterparts are still there. The really odd ones are the benches with shoulders and center seat, because you get 5 female buckles there. In 72, or at least by 72, they had made a special male tab with a keyhole for a pin on the shoulder belt, so you'd plug the shoulder belt into the main belt, then plug that into the buckle. A little less clutter.
Koda is online now  
Old October 14th, 2014, 07:29 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VikingBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 483
wow I am so embarrassed. something so obvious yet not obvious to me !

am ashamed. yes, that makes sense now.
VikingBlue is offline  
Old October 14th, 2014, 03:00 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
66-3X2 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham,Alabama
Posts: 4,671
In 66 they used a male and female buckle for the shoulder belts in the middle so you can't mix them up.
66-3X2 442 is offline  
Old October 15th, 2014, 06:42 AM
  #6  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,723
Originally Posted by 66-3X2 442
In 66 they used a male and female buckle for the shoulder belts in the middle so you can't mix them up.
If the two inboard female buckles are the same, what difference does it make if you "mix them up"? In any case, I find that one of the female belts is always shorter than the other once I adjust them, so it's pretty easy to tell which goes where.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old October 15th, 2014, 07:41 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
66-3X2 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham,Alabama
Posts: 4,671
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
If the two inboard female buckles are the same, what difference does it make if you "mix them up"? In any case, I find that one of the female belts is always shorter than the other once I adjust them, so it's pretty easy to tell which goes where.
You will have to ask GM about why they did it that way in 66. I find it odd they would do that and go away from it in later years. It doesn't make a difference I wouldn't think,just trying to add to the topic.
66-3X2 442 is offline  
Old October 15th, 2014, 07:51 AM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,723
Originally Posted by 66-3X2 442
You will have to ask GM about why they did it that way in 66. I find it odd they would do that and go away from it in later years.
Not odd at all. In 1966, the outboard part of the shoulder belt was stowed by sliding the buckle over a tab attached to the rear quarter interior panel. Obviously, this required a female buckle on that part of the shoulder belt. When GM went to the two wire clips on the roof rail for stowing the shoulder belt, the buckle didn't matter and the male buckle was smaller, thus the change.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old October 15th, 2014, 10:47 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
66-3X2 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham,Alabama
Posts: 4,671
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Not odd at all. In 1966, the outboard part of the shoulder belt was stowed by sliding the buckle over a tab attached to the rear quarter interior panel. Obviously, this required a female buckle on that part of the shoulder belt. When GM went to the two wire clips on the roof rail for stowing the shoulder belt, the buckle didn't matter and the male buckle was smaller, thus the change.
Yeah,I know that and if you remember,I sent you the installation instructions. If they had used a male buckle on the shoulder belt,I bet they could have found a way to park it when not in use. I suppose it was easier to use the female on the shoulder belt.
66-3X2 442 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Octania
General Discussion
15
June 1st, 2014 12:21 PM
Octania
Small Blocks
17
October 28th, 2013 02:01 PM
sx455raidercelticfan
Parts For Sale
2
December 26th, 2010 04:13 PM
sx455raidercelticfan
Parts Wanted
5
December 21st, 2010 08:59 PM
dc2x4drvr
Interior/Upholstery
3
October 19th, 2009 04:20 PM



Quick Reply: Bucket seat seatbelt oddity ?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:01 AM.