General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Almost doubled my fuel mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 22nd, 2013 | 09:35 AM
  #41  
pogo69's Avatar
morgan
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,925
From: CT
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Look, as a certified master ASE auto tech, you should know that what you are suggesting should NOT "double the gas mileage" on a car that is properly jetted and tuned. Is it possible for this to work on one specific vehicle that may have been jetted too lean or otherwise not optimized? Sure. Just don't think this will work on EVERY car.
this makes sense to me... i doubt if i tried it on my car i would see any difference but i guess its one of those things you scratch your head about if its working on your car thats great
Old August 22nd, 2013 | 03:19 PM
  #42  
Sampson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,603
From: Fuquay Varina NC
Originally Posted by Koda
Agreed. To clarify, what happens on oddball cavities in an airflow is air gets trapped there and circulates (ie, leaves in your pickup truck bed). You get a boundary layer over that rotating pocket which would be a line from the hood in front of the snoots to the top of them. Now, with air intake running, you will be replenishing that air some, so it will disrupt the boundary layer to a certain extent, but it won't be noticeable at all. It would be like hanging your elbow out the window.
Agreed again, but if you let the tailgate down in the truck the leaves blow out and your gas mileage goes up 1-2 mpg! The air deflects off your elbo but if you flip our hand up there is a strong drag. That being said I have read numerous articles over the years that questioned the benefit of any of the factory OAI set ups for the same reasons you just stated. There is a negative airflow under 1-2 inches above the hood.
Old August 22nd, 2013 | 03:38 PM
  #43  
s i 442's Avatar
Oldsmobile enthusiast
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 689
You want to really gain some MPG?
Mix 3oz of Acetone with 10gl of gas a few times.
Old August 22nd, 2013 | 04:33 PM
  #44  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Sampson
Agreed again, but if you let the tailgate down in the truck the leaves blow out and your gas mileage goes up 1-2 mpg!
Wanna bet?

Mythbusters Database

Once again, this is why I continually say that subsonic aerodynamics and airflow is NOT intuitive. The flow lines rarely travel the way you think they will. Supersonic aerodynamics are different and much easier to calculate, as I learned with the dinosaurs when I was in college.
Old August 22nd, 2013 | 04:41 PM
  #45  
Sampson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,603
From: Fuquay Varina NC
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Wanna bet?

Mythbusters Database

Once again, this is why I continually say that subsonic aerodynamics and airflow is NOT intuitive. The flow lines rarely travel the way you think they will. Supersonic aerodynamics are different and much easier to calculate, as I learned with the dinosaurs when I was in college.
Well I learn something new every day.....I stand corrected.
Old August 22nd, 2013 | 06:23 PM
  #46  
ziff396's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,015
From: Near Muskegon Michigan
Originally Posted by Sampson
Agreed again, but if you let the tailgate down in the truck the leaves blow out and your gas mileage goes up 1-2 mpg! The air deflects off your elbo but if you flip our hand up there is a strong drag. That being said I have read numerous articles over the years that questioned the benefit of any of the factory OAI set ups for the same reasons you just stated. There is a negative airflow under 1-2 inches above the hood.
Yeah, I also heard that back in the 80's. I drove my truck, 79 regular cab 8' box 4 wheel drive, on a 200 mile 1 way trip with the tailgate down. On the return trip I left it up. NO difference in mileage.
Old August 25th, 2013 | 05:51 AM
  #47  
HonestDave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 915
From: Richmond BC
If you were living up here in the "great white north" where gas is about $7 a gallon for regular, if someone said they could squeeze another yard out of a tank, you'd probably try it !!
Old August 25th, 2013 | 09:54 AM
  #48  
Professur's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,815
From: Mo-Ray-Al, K-Bec.
what he said
Old August 25th, 2013 | 10:00 AM
  #49  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by HonestDave
If you were living up here in the "great white north" where gas is about $7 a gallon for regular, if someone said they could squeeze another yard out of a tank, you'd probably try it !!
I'm sorry, but Bull Sheet. If you cared that much about the cost of gas, you'd be driving a Prius.
Old August 25th, 2013 | 10:10 AM
  #50  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 11,153
From: Evansville, IN
Please don't consider Mythbusters to be science, or their results to have any scientific weight about them. They are the technical counterpart to snopes.

I was using the pickup truck as an example of boundary layers, and shouldn't have mentioned it, because it's Something Everyone Knows, like it's in the man code or something.

To redirect back to topic, there will be no noticeable drag reduction when plugging the hood.
Old August 25th, 2013 | 10:58 AM
  #51  
HonestDave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 915
From: Richmond BC
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
I'm sorry, but Bull Sheet. If you cared that much about the cost of gas, you'd be driving a Prius.
My friend,
You're sharp as attack this morning.
Old August 25th, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #52  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by HonestDave
My friend,
You're sharp as attack this morning.
Badda BING...
Old August 25th, 2013 | 11:27 AM
  #53  
z11375ss's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,941
Well I for one am certainly glad that Padavano and queer picture guy cleared this up. There is no way this could have worked because they, in their infinite wisdom of the hypothetical, have determined exactly that.
Old August 25th, 2013 | 05:04 PM
  #54  
toms vista's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 98
From: Pataskala Ohio
Drove up to Alliance for the Olds show today . 320 mile round trip . 115 miles of the drive up no foam, cool morning , windows up ,60 - 65 MPH (11.8 MPG ) Put foam in and drove another 205 miles ,coming home 85 degrees, windows down, vent windows open, 60 -65 MPH. (16.9 MPG) Also the long distance award and best of shoe went to a beautiful red W-30 with 00000.5 miles on the odometer . Gotta love the trailer queens
Old August 25th, 2013 | 06:12 PM
  #55  
z11375ss's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,941
That could not have happened.
Old August 25th, 2013 | 06:29 PM
  #56  
pogo69's Avatar
morgan
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,925
From: CT
Originally Posted by z11375ss
That could not have happened.
I agree a car like that shouldnt win anything....a half of mile? That poor car never been driven....i thunk if it had to put any more miles than just backing off the trailer the car might just implode into a dust pile
Old August 25th, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #57  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by pogo69
....i thunk if it had to put any more miles than just backing off the trailer the car might just implode into a dust pile
Au contraire!

Mechanical odometer - it backs out of the trailer, then drives onto the trailer.

Backs off, drives on.

Backs off, drives on.

The car could have 100,000 miles on it, all just backing up and driving forward, constantly canceling the mileage it just put on.

- Eric
Old August 25th, 2013 | 07:39 PM
  #58  
pogo69's Avatar
morgan
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,925
From: CT
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Au contraire!

Mechanical odometer - it backs out of the trailer, then drives onto the trailer.

Backs off, drives on.

Backs off, drives on.

The car could have 100,000 miles on it, all just backing up and driving forward, constantly canceling the mileage it just put on.

- Eric
Very clever
Old August 25th, 2013 | 07:53 PM
  #59  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Honestly, though, if a guy restored a car and installed a 00000.0 speedo, and all he ever did was trailer it to shows and back it off, since most of his driving would be the same distance in each direction, with the occasional insane, breakneck 5mph drive down a row to get to his space, he could do that for years and rack up only a small fraction of the actual (tiny) number of miles he had put on it.

That being said, I wouldn't be surprised at a trailer queen jockey getting under the car and turning back the odometer after every show - how hard would it be?

- Eric
Old August 25th, 2013 | 08:18 PM
  #60  
z11375ss's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,941
Eric, you're cracking me up. Wax on, wax off. How about if the trailer queen just took the speed cable out of its housing? Voila! No mileage at all.

The car could have 100,000 miles on it, all just backing up and driving forward, constantly canceling the mileage it just put on.

LOL!^^^
Old August 25th, 2013 | 08:25 PM
  #61  
pogo69's Avatar
morgan
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,925
From: CT
Originally Posted by z11375ss
Eric, you're cracking me up. Wax on, wax off. How about if the trailer queen just took the speed cable out of its housing? Voila! No mileage at all.

The car could have 100,000 miles on it, all just backing up and driving forward, constantly canceling the mileage it just put on.

LOL!^^^
No way would he diss the speedo cable ...thats the first thing a judge is going to look at on a half mile car
Old August 25th, 2013 | 10:16 PM
  #62  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 11,153
From: Evansville, IN
Originally Posted by z11375ss
Well I for one am certainly glad that Padavano and queer picture guy cleared this up. There is no way this could have worked because they, in their infinite wisdom of the hypothetical, have determined exactly that.
That's.....the best you can do? "Queer picture guy?" Lawlz.

Let me see if I can think up a retort........oooh, oooh, I GOT ONE.

Ahem, cough, ahem. "THAT'S NOT WHAT YOUR WIFE SAYS!!!!"

Can we come back from the third grade now?
Old August 26th, 2013 | 03:39 PM
  #63  
BlackGold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,587
From: West Michigan
Originally Posted by toms vista
Drove up to Alliance for the Olds show today . 320 mile round trip . 115 miles of the drive up no foam, cool morning , windows up ,60 - 65 MPH (11.8 MPG ) Put foam in and drove another 205 miles ,coming home 85 degrees, windows down, vent windows open, 60 -65 MPH. (16.9 MPG)
I'll give you the benefit of doubt that you're measuring miles and fuel accurately, which may be generous. Different gas pumps shut off at different times.

All I can say is that running with the scoops open must be making your carb run really rich at cruise, or running with them plugged must be making the carb run really lean. And, as a certified ASE Master Tech, you should be capable of determining which it is and adjust the carb accordingly. Let us know what you determine.

I've considered making similar scoop plugs because 1) I'd like to measure the effect of OAI/no-OAI at the dragstrip, and 2) I've always wondered if the scoops might lead to higher underhood pressures, thus making the cooling system less efficient. I've wanted to experiment with this with some pressure sensors. Some day ......
Old August 26th, 2013 | 05:50 PM
  #64  
navvet's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 714
From: Big Lake,MN..Spent most of my life in Boston
a 2100 mile trip with a rats nest in my air cleaner (unknown to me) produced 39mpg in my dodge neon!! Remove nest and replace air filter 25mpg. Can't get more scientific then that
Old August 26th, 2013 | 08:22 PM
  #65  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by navvet
a 2100 mile trip with a rats nest in my air cleaner (unknown to me) produced 39mpg in my dodge neon!! Remove nest and replace air filter 25mpg. Can't get more scientific then that
Yes, and in the true spirit of science, it's an experiment with no relation to the subject at hand.

The Neon is a computer-controlled, closed-loop, fuel injected car with a mass airflow sensor.
The sensor senses how much air is being drawn in, adjusts the fuel delivery for proper ratio, taking into consideration the throttle position, and adjusts the ratio based on the O2 sensor reading of the exhaust, so a blocked air cleaner will simply reduce maximum airflow, keeping the A/F ratio correct.
Essentially, it's the same as putting a block of wood under your gas pedal.

It's a very different story in a carbureted car, where reducing airflow will inevitably richen the mixture, potentially causing poor running and reducing fuel economy.

We still don't know what factor caused the improvement in fuel economy in Tom's Vista (if in fact there was an improvement), but whatever it was, it was not simply blocking intake airflow.

- Eric
Old August 26th, 2013 | 09:09 PM
  #66  
brddg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 421
Please do everyone here a favor and stop the argument at the same time. Put a regular open element air cleaner on it and check the mileage. Ram air or no air what will happen?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Wood
Small Blocks
25
January 18th, 2015 10:23 AM
Kyle's 77 Cutlass
General Discussion
37
November 14th, 2014 09:40 PM
Danp76
General Discussion
12
February 26th, 2013 03:01 PM
Rocko442
Cars For Sale
9
March 26th, 2012 07:58 PM
Scottem
Other Oldsmobiles
5
June 22nd, 2009 02:48 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM.