General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

394 in a 63 F85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 03:28 PM
  #1  
carwashwiz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11
From: Hailey/Ketchum Idaho
394 in a 63 F85

I am told by experienced members that Oldsmobile never put a 394 ci in a 63 cutlass. But for the last year and a half a website called dustyoldcars had a 63 F85 convertible with a 394 ci they claimed was an original factory car. I wanted to buy it but the body and undercarriage was soo badly corroded I just couldn't pay the outrages asking price of 17,000 for a car that might literarily fall apart in shipping...surly some members saw this car )it was copper colored). Of course I just recently looked and it is gone!
At any rate do we know if Oldsmobile built the 63 with the 394 ci option?
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 03:41 PM
  #2  
jcdynamic88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,558
From: central massachusetts
dusty old cars

if this is the place in new hampshire they don't care about accuracy in their ads, i think they are morons. they advertised a 65 f85 saying it had the original "rocket" 350 engine, the car had a 307 in it, egr intake and we all know that it should have been a 330. i think they make stuff up as they go
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 04:20 PM
  #3  
carwashwiz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 11
From: Hailey/Ketchum Idaho
394 ci in a 63 cutlass

Yes, that is the place and yes, you are correct...they are morons!
Thanks!!
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 06:53 PM
  #4  
young olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,049
From: Mt Vernon,WA
In any case I'd like to see a y body with a 394 stuffed in it
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 06:55 PM
  #5  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,712
Well, Pontiac managed to put a 421 in theirs.
Old Jul 19, 2015 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
therobski's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,191
From: Dallas-Fort Worth
And just to say, the 63 F-85 Cutlass was the last year for the all alumium 215 V8. A totally new full frame 64 F-85 emerged with a Buick V-6 or an all new Olds 330 V-8. The 330 is a great SBO.
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 07:32 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by '69442ragtop
Well, Pontiac managed to put a 421 in theirs.
Pontiac put the 326 in the 63 Tempest from the factory. The 421 is externally identical to the 326, so that was a bolt-in. The 394 is extremely heavy and weighs well over twice what the 215 weighs. Olds NEVER installed one in a Y-body from the factory, and frankly, it would be an awful car if you did. The front suspension is not up to the task of supporting it, for starters.
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 10:00 AM
  #8  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,712
At that, the 421s were AF/X cars and only a few were made all with significant mods to the platform and suspension made to handle the extra torque. IIRC, they were all wagons, too. I remember reading that the 326 factory installation was problematic and considered to be pushing the envelope as far as possible. So it's easy to see how the 394 would have been an impossibility for Olds.
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 05:01 PM
  #9  
1968_Post's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 361
From: Tennessee
Coupes also...
Old Jul 20, 2015 | 05:40 PM
  #10  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,810
From: Evansville, IN
You just let that car be secure in its identity.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trackz man
Big Blocks
4
Dec 13, 2010 12:45 PM
Motorama
Big Blocks
2
Dec 6, 2006 08:56 AM
Hot67mjl
Big Blocks
4
Jan 24, 2006 11:16 AM
<Dy88>
Big Blocks
1
Jan 24, 2006 11:09 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:33 AM.