General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

1967 A body frame compatibility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2016 | 08:25 AM
  #1  
tomxk8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 32
From: York Pa.
1967 A body frame compatibility

Hi guys.
I have a question about the 1967 GM A body frames. Olds advertised "heavy duty " frames in there 442, but, other then the convertible were the frames of other GM A bodies interchangeable. What made me curious was a frame I was looking at for sale from a regular cutlass, I noticed it only had one set of holes where the rear upper control arm mounted as opposed to two set (on each side) on my 442 frame. Are there other differences and are Pontiac, Buick, & Chevy different from the 442 also?
Old Dec 17, 2016 | 08:54 AM
  #2  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,798
From: Evansville, IN
Tom, I think the 442 frame and the cutlass frame were the same, and extra holes were added to the 442 ones along the way. There was an option for heavy duty frame on at least the non-convertible 442s that was simply the boxed convertible frame under the non-convertible car. This may have been available in other trim lines of Olds A body as well.
Old Dec 17, 2016 | 11:22 AM
  #3  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
It's my understanding that the convertible frames are the heavy duty frames offered in 442's, the same thing. I'm sure the experts will chime in here.
My 66 convertible frame also has the two sets of mounting holes but the hole diameter is smaller on the unused set. I have no idea why that is or what the purpose was for but they are different in size. I have two pics here that illustrate that. They aren't the best pics but you'll see the difference. I hope this helps
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
DSC01291.JPG (144.5 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg
DSC01292.JPG (137.7 KB, 38 views)
Old Dec 17, 2016 | 12:40 PM
  #4  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 514
I'm not an expert, but will share that the 1964-67 4 speed cars had a different frame than the automatic ones. The 4 speed frame was one piece in front and over the rear axle. The automatic cars had a splice just in front of the rear axle. I don't know for sure if the 66&67 frames had the 4 holes for the shock mounts, or the extra gusset for the front cross member. But I'm pretty sure both 64&65 did.
Old Dec 17, 2016 | 12:42 PM
  #5  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 514
One more thing... Oldsmobile used a radiator with side tanks before the other GM A-body cars. So a 1967 Chevelle frame will not interchange with a Cutlass/442

John
Old Dec 17, 2016 | 12:56 PM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by TripDeuces
It's my understanding that the convertible frames are the heavy duty frames offered in 442's, the same thing. I'm sure the experts will chime in here.
You are correct, which is why the heavy duty frame option was not available on convertibles - those cars already had it.
Old Dec 18, 2016 | 06:26 AM
  #7  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,026
The advertising statement "heavy duty frame" was just hype; all F85s had the same frame, except for the convertibles/F35 true HD frame. There were two suppliers, A.O. Smith and Pontiac. The latter is the "one hole" type which also shows more welded together areas vs. the more "molded" Smith. I have found the Pontiac only under automatic cars, but some auto's had the Smith frame.
Old Dec 18, 2016 | 05:36 PM
  #8  
kjr442's Avatar
Kjr442
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,817
From: Texas
There are a lot of differences between the automatic frame and the standard shift frame. the convertible frame is boxed on the frame rails, unlike the other two variations.
442 had the same heavy duty, or standard shift frame, no matter if it was automatic, or standard shift.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Napoleon Solo
Chassis/Body/Frame
2
Oct 31, 2012 08:58 PM
sixty9olds
General Discussion
1
Jun 14, 2011 06:43 PM
1969goatman
Parts For Sale
0
Aug 30, 2010 07:44 PM
tarheeldoc
Cutlass
1
Sep 7, 2007 05:31 AM
D. McHenry
Cutlass
2
May 5, 2006 03:23 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:59 PM.