Fuel sending unit for 56 Olds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 30, 2014 | 03:21 AM
  #1  
ignachuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Frank Ignachuck
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,302
From: Maynard, Massachusetts
Fuel sending unit for 56 Olds

Dusting off an old thread with a new question:

I have a 56 Super 88 and recently replaced the sending unit. The gauge at the dash tested fine, by the way. So, with the tank full, the gauge stops just a tad under one half. Before taking the sending unit out, I wrote to the vendor to ask if he had tested it. He says that the unit should read zero ohms empty and 30 ohms full. I wrote back that everything I read says it should be 90 ohms full, and that's the problem.

Sanity check please.

Thanks,
Frank
Old Dec 30, 2014 | 06:42 AM
  #2  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,475
From: Poteau, Ok
I moved your post to a new thread in stead of resurrecting an old one. If you remove the wire from the fuel sender the gauge should go to full or beyond. If you ground the wire it should go to empty. I believe your gauge may be a 0-30 ohm, 0-90 were 65 and newer.
Old Dec 30, 2014 | 11:19 AM
  #3  
Tedd Thompson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,743
From: Forest Ranch Ca.
Double check your ground wire, they often corrode up and give bad readings. Remember they are grounded through the gas line with a Micky Mouse clamp and if the line has been altered, repaired (gas line spliced with rubber hose) they won't work correctly or at all....Tedd
Old Dec 31, 2014 | 11:15 PM
  #4  
Ozzie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,614
From: S.E. Louisiana, so far still in U.S.A.
My original equipment sender on my 1955 Olds reads 1.2 ohms in the empty position and 30.5 ohms in the full position. If the 1956 is similar and your gauge is correct, with a full tank, it should be seeing about 30 ohms where it is actually seeing about half of that. Perhaps you could try it with the sender out of the tank to see if the gauge is linear for its range of movement.
Old Feb 2, 2023 | 06:34 AM
  #5  
Clutch Cargo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 35
From: The beach NC/SC
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
I moved your post to a new thread in stead of resurrecting an old one. If you remove the wire from the fuel sender the gauge should go to full or beyond. If you ground the wire it should go to empty. I believe your gauge may be a 0-30 ohm, 0-90 were 65 and newer.
Oldcutlass can you move my fuel gauge posts to new so I can get some help ?

Cutch
Old Feb 2, 2023 | 06:38 AM
  #6  
Clutch Cargo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 35
From: The beach NC/SC
Most FOMOCO fuel senders measure exactly as you describe 0 ohm and 90 ohms.
Some one made a mistake here.
Old Feb 4, 2023 | 06:29 AM
  #7  
Tedd Thompson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,743
From: Forest Ranch Ca.
Don't think so, or at least 55's run on the 0 to 30 ohms. I don't know when they changed ,but early cars had the 0 to 30 as a standard.

Now my 55 will run out of gas with 1/8 showing on the gauge, I guess it always has but took me 20 years and a tow in Montana to find this out, I always run on the top half except that time...Tedd
Old Feb 4, 2023 | 06:56 AM
  #8  
Clutch Cargo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 35
From: The beach NC/SC
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Ozzie
My original equipment sender on my 1955 Olds reads 1.2 ohms in the empty position and 30.5 ohms in the full position. If the 1956 is similar and your gauge is correct, with a full tank, it should be seeing about 30 ohms where it is actually seeing about half of that. Perhaps you could try it with the sender out of the tank to see if the gauge is linear for its range of movement.
Thanks so much I fully intend to mock the entire assembly up out side of the car now that I have a new sender and a gauge from a 55
Old Feb 4, 2023 | 08:00 AM
  #9  
Vintage Chief's Avatar
Running On Empty
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 25,789
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Clutch Cargo
Most FOMOCO fuel senders measure exactly as you describe 0 ohm and 90 ohms.
Some one made a mistake here.
No one made a mistake - most pre-'65 GM cars read 0 ohms (empty), 30 ohms (full).
Old Feb 4, 2023 | 08:05 AM
  #10  
Vintage Chief's Avatar
Running On Empty
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 25,789
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Clutch Cargo
Oldcutlass can you move my fuel gauge posts to new so I can get some help ?

Cutch
You can accomplish this on your own by (1) creating a new thread (of your own) with your own thread title, (2) copy/paste your piggyback (what you posted into other's) posts into your new thread; and, (3) delete your previous (piggyback) posts. Always best to create your own thread for better assistance. Good luck.
Old Feb 4, 2023 | 10:39 AM
  #11  
ignachuck's Avatar
Thread Starter
Frank Ignachuck
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,302
From: Maynard, Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Vintage Chief
No one made a mistake - most pre-'65 GM cars read 0 ohms (empty), 30 ohms (full).
From the 30's into the 60's - 0 to 30 ohms.
Old Feb 4, 2023 | 10:41 AM
  #12  
Vintage Chief's Avatar
Running On Empty
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 25,789
From: Earth
Originally Posted by ignachuck
From the 30's into the 60's - 0 to 30 ohms.
Frank - Prior to the 30's they used a stick (I believe)?
Old Feb 4, 2023 | 01:26 PM
  #13  
Clutch Cargo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 35
From: The beach NC/SC
So what you read was the problem
Old Feb 9, 2023 | 06:54 AM
  #14  
Clutch Cargo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 35
From: The beach NC/SC
Originally Posted by Ozzie
My original equipment sender on my 1955 Olds reads 1.2 ohms in the empty position and 30.5 ohms in the full position. If the 1956 is similar and your gauge is correct, with a full tank, it should be seeing about 30 ohms where it is actually seeing about half of that. Perhaps you could try it with the sender out of the tank to see if the gauge is linear for its range of movement.
YESS!! I did as you suggest and success!!
I got a used 55 OLDS fuel gauge. and mocked up the system using a current limited 12VDC supply, jumper clips and a sending unit from a 58 Ford.
E reads at 1.2 Ohms and F reads at 29.7 Ohms.
AND with the tank lead disconnected it "pegs" exactly as described by others in this Thread
Thanks so much for all the expert help and advice
Old Feb 9, 2023 | 06:56 AM
  #15  
Clutch Cargo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 35
From: The beach NC/SC
Thanks Norm I am not that computer savvy
Old Feb 9, 2023 | 06:59 AM
  #16  
Vintage Chief's Avatar
Running On Empty
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 25,789
From: Earth
Originally Posted by Clutch Cargo
Thanks Norm I am not that computer savvy
Understand...no worries.
Old Feb 19, 2023 | 11:51 AM
  #17  
Clutch Cargo's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 35
From: The beach NC/SC
Thanks, Ozzie, for your most accurate information on this. I found that the meter operates as sort of a "Bridge" circuit with the unknown leg being 1 Ohm to 30 Ohms.
This makes the dual coil D'arsonval meter track in a nonlinear fashion. My test bed repeatedly measures one half full at 10 Ohms.

regards Clutch
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
56holiday
Electrical
20
Feb 19, 2023 11:55 AM
jeclin
Electrical
22
Aug 9, 2020 06:32 AM
octanejunkie
Eighty-Eight
4
Sep 17, 2014 05:26 AM
Del70
General Discussion
12
Jul 2, 2014 09:29 AM
Tony72Cutlass'S'
Electrical
39
Feb 27, 2012 09:36 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:46 AM.