Drive shaft / propeller shaft question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 15th, 2016 | 01:23 PM
  #1  
70convert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 198
From: Hardyston, NJ
Drive shaft / propeller shaft question

according to the service manual I was supposed to mark the shaft 6 years ago when I started the MAW. Its time to start reassembly and there are weights on both ends of the shaft but not sure if it makes a difference. Any help would be appreciated.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
20160615_160636.jpg (2.65 MB, 69 views)
File Type: jpg
20160615_160759.jpg (1.07 MB, 54 views)
Old June 15th, 2016 | 03:50 PM
  #2  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,171
From: Poteau, Ok
It should not make a difference, the drive shaft is independently balanced.
Old June 16th, 2016 | 09:13 AM
  #3  
droldsmorland's Avatar
CH3NO2 LEARN IT BURN IT
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,050
From: Land of Taxes
I believe the "slip joint" end (Right side in the pic) goes towards the rear. Look down the shaft and make sure the u-joints are "in-phase"(parallel). The two piece automatic shafts are known to twist out of phase. It will effect the balance.

Edit Clarification...when I said slip joint above I was referring to the two piece drive shaft interface. Automatic Olds of certain years had a two piece driveshaft where they inserted a smaller diameter tube into a larger tube with a rubber sleeve in between the two. That joint is biased towards the pinion yoke or the rear axle. The design was to reduce drive train noise, as Olds was noted to be a level above Chevy in this manor. With a hard shifting automatic, high performance upgrades and or age these two shafts can rotate in relation to each other. Thus becoming twisted "out-of-phase" in relation to the ujoint yokes. Always verify Ujoint yoke phasing with these two piece shafts. I know for a fact my automatic 68s all had the two piece shaft. It appears that practice went through at least 70. Not sure about 71-72 and beyond or before 68. The stick shifted cars received the one piece shaft tapered down on both ends. Olds and everyone else knew that the stick cars were harder on the drive train.

Last edited by droldsmorland; June 17th, 2016 at 06:45 AM.
Old June 16th, 2016 | 05:46 PM
  #4  
70convert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 198
From: Hardyston, NJ
thanks guys I didnt think it made a difference
Old June 17th, 2016 | 05:00 AM
  #5  
RocketV8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 145
From: Mora, Sweden
I always thought the driveshaft and pinion yoke were balanced together. True or not - two weeks ago I installed the drive shaft in our 1975 Firebird and ended up with a slight vibration (did not mark the shaft prior to removal). Flipped the shaft 180 degrees and now it is smooth as silk.
Old June 17th, 2016 | 06:31 AM
  #6  
droldsmorland's Avatar
CH3NO2 LEARN IT BURN IT
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,050
From: Land of Taxes
The pinion yoke does not get balanced...A trans slip yoke does for sure, think thats what ya meant. They should be balanced as a unit. Best practice is to mark everything before disassembly. Even Ujoint replacement can effect balance. Thats why Ive learned to just take shafts into the local shaft house have them install spicers and balance.
Old June 17th, 2016 | 12:34 PM
  #7  
RocketV8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 145
From: Mora, Sweden
No, I meant pinion yoke. All components are balanced and I would guess as a complete assembly. I pulled this from the 1966 chassis manual, see below.
Note the part about marking the parts during disassembly of both pinion and slip yoke. Also note the alignment marks on prop shaft and pinion yoke in the picture.

To summarize - it looks like the factory balanced everything together and if possible you should keep all three components in their original alignment. If you lose it - no problem, just try it the other way(s). I have done it, heard it, read it and seen it work many times.





Old June 17th, 2016 | 03:29 PM
  #8  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,171
From: Poteau, Ok
I have never had a problem in over 40 years of changing Ujoints with a vibration problem unless the driveshaft was damaged.
Old June 17th, 2016 | 09:25 PM
  #9  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,525
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
This is something I had wondered about too. When I restored my driveshaft and rear axle in 2012 there was no way there were going to be any identification marks left on the pumpkin or spider. Since I didn't change u-joints (still OEM Saginaw and perfect) I don't expect there would be any issues with balance.

Here's something you can discuss further. When the shaft was installed at the factory chassis assembly, do you think they had time to do anything but install the slip yoke and tighten up the spider? I think not and those cars rolled out with no vibrations.
Old June 20th, 2016 | 03:24 PM
  #10  
droldsmorland's Avatar
CH3NO2 LEARN IT BURN IT
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,050
From: Land of Taxes
Thats why Im somewhat confused and maybe misunderstanding Rocket. Sure its good practice to put the drive shaft back into the same place it was removed from particularly if nothing was replaced...just good mechanical practice. Will it effect balance...it can, as things get seated and like to be put back in the same spot. But when a drive shaft is pulled and new ujoints are installed, or other...common practice is to dynamically rebalance the shaft with the trans slip yoke attached and the rear ujoint installed. No pinion yoke. The balance machine receives the slip yoke and the two caps of the rear ujoint. No pinion yoke in that equation.
Old June 20th, 2016 | 04:31 PM
  #11  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,171
From: Poteau, Ok
How many people had to replace their yoke for one reason or another? Did they rebalance the assy? I for one never have.
Old March 6th, 2019 | 03:47 PM
  #12  
alain's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 934
Sorry my answer was for 1970 cars
Alain
Old March 7th, 2019 | 02:12 PM
  #13  
droldsmorland's Avatar
CH3NO2 LEARN IT BURN IT
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,050
From: Land of Taxes
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
How many people had to replace their yoke for one reason or another? Did they rebalance the assy? I for one never have.
Slip yoke replacement can be done as a stand-alone separate from driveshaft replacement for many reasons. Replacement is required when the yoke is heavily grooved on the seal surface, its damaged in some manner or wben changing the series of u joint or series of transmission for custom applications. If it inspects ok no reason to not reuse it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
67Rocket
Drivetrain/Differentials
2
October 24th, 2018 11:51 AM
harriscu
Drivetrain/Differentials
10
May 15th, 2016 09:45 PM
Robert Kiedrowski
Drivetrain/Differentials
1
June 28th, 2015 05:22 AM
Daniel Marsh
Drivetrain/Differentials
14
October 15th, 2014 06:34 PM
johnnyjaws
Drivetrain/Differentials
13
September 4th, 2014 12:07 PM



Quick Reply: Drive shaft / propeller shaft question



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:16 AM.