Boxed Control Arms

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #1  
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,021
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Question Boxed Control Arms

Hi guys,

Did Oldsmobile make boxed lower control arms for Cutlass models?

If so, are they necessary for an anti-sway bar? Thanks.

Last edited by stlbluesbrother; Dec 10, 2009 at 10:35 AM.
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 10:38 AM
  #2  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,021
Any 64-72 lower arm was boxed if a rear sway bar was on the car. the boxing includes spacers to keep the arm from getting crushed when you tighten the sway bar mounting bolts.
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 10:51 AM
  #3  
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,798
From: Plano, TX
R2R is right.
If a sway bar is to be added, the lower arms must be either boxed withthe available weld-in bottom plates with integrated spacers, or just buy aftermarket boxed arms. The latter might be easier and more cost and time efficient, considering they will have new bushings pressed in and will be prepainted.

AVOID the temptation to use chunks of pipe for spacers without enclosing the bottoms of the arms. I have heard of this being done and the arms will flex, fatigue, and break soon.

Shims may be needed also. Never tighten the sway bar bolts down if there is a gap between the arm and sway bar.

Last edited by Lady72nRob71; Dec 10, 2009 at 10:53 AM.
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #4  
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,021
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Thanks for the info guys. This is helpful should I add one.

So, Olds did offer an anti-sway bar option on Cutlass Supremes back in the early 70's?

Last edited by stlbluesbrother; Dec 10, 2009 at 11:09 AM. Reason: spelling
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,698
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by stlbluesbrother
Thanks for the info guys. This is helpful should I add one.

So, Olds did offer an anti-sway bar option on Cutlass Supremes back in the early 70's?
Yes. The FE2 suspension package was an available option.
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 06:17 PM
  #6  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
If you plan an upgrade, I'd plan on a set of aftermarket arms.
By the time you're done messing with 40yr old flimsy arms, they're just as heavy, and not as strong.
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 06:58 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,698
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by J-(Chicago)
If you plan an upgrade, I'd plan on a set of aftermarket arms.
By the time you're done messing with 40yr old flimsy arms, they're just as heavy, and not as strong.
I don't agree with that. Many of the aftermarket arms I've seen were apparently designed by someone with no concept of structural engineering. First, strength is less important in this application than stiffness (the are NOT the same thing). The large boxed cross section of the factory arms is quite a bit stiffer than that of the round tubular aftermarket arms I've seen. Even worse, there is at least one vendor selling adjustable lower arms with the threaded adjuster right in the middle of the arm. That puts the smallest cross section (the threads on the adjuster) right at the point of maximum bending moment.

DOH!!

Aftermarket arms that are rectangular box sections that are about the same cross section as stock will be equivalent in stiffness, but since you can get repro boxing plates for about $25 a set if you shop around, that seems to be a cost-effective solution to me.
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 07:10 AM
  #8  
OLD SKL 69's Avatar
GM Enthusiast
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,982
From: Long Island, New York
I had replaced my 69 arms due to bad rust flaking and pitting. Just didn't see the point in trying to weld plates on the bottom of them because they were so far gone. I guess it all depends upon how good your lower arms are and if you can weld plates in yourself.

I ordered replacement boxed lower control arms from Brothers Automotive. They were great pieces and looked factory original. And... I didn't have to press in new bushings either.
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 07:44 AM
  #9  
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,798
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by OLD SKL 69
Just didn't see the point in trying to weld plates on the bottom of them because they were so far gone. I guess it all depends upon how good your lower arms are and if you can weld plates in yourself.

I ordered replacement boxed lower control arms from.......... They were great pieces and looked factory original. And... I didn't have to press in new bushings either.
I went the same route; my rectangular stock-type arms came from the Muscle Factory. They were made just like the original boxed arms. I got the sway bar shims and bolts there, too - the bolts were cheaper from there than from the local hardware store.

I thought about the $30 plates, but then I would have had to pay a shop to press out and install ($30??) the new bushings ($25), paint the arms (except bottom edges) ($8 for a can of POR15), pay someone to weld the plates in well ($20??), clean the welds, and finish painting.
When I figured the cost, it would have been more than the $100 I paid for the new arms. Calling in the order took less time, too!

It all depends on your skills and abilities - If I could easily weld and press, I would have gone withthe plate method.

All I need now is a stinkin sway bar...

Last edited by Lady72nRob71; Dec 11, 2009 at 07:49 AM.
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 07:47 AM
  #10  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,021
Olds started using the rear sway bar on their "muscle car" with the 64-442, still available as 394926. They also had a rear bar for the 66-70 full size cars AKA police cars, 396620.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 06:14 PM
  #11  
mike's88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 450
From: brookfield, ill
Originally Posted by Lady72nRob71
R2R is right.
If a sway bar is to be added, the lower arms must be either boxed withthe available weld-in bottom plates with integrated spacers, or just buy aftermarket boxed arms. The latter might be easier and more cost and time efficient, considering they will have new bushings pressed in and will be prepainted.

AVOID the temptation to use chunks of pipe for spacers without enclosing the bottoms of the arms. I have heard of this being done and the arms will flex, fatigue, and break soon.

Shims may be needed also. Never tighten the sway bar bolts down if there is a gap between the arm and sway bar.
This is exactly what I did with my open control arms, except that I did weld plates across the bottoms. Can't say if they'll work yet because the car is off the road as of now. but I can't see where they won't.
Old Dec 13, 2009 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,798
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by mike's88
This is exactly what I did with my open control arms, except that I did weld plates across the bottoms.
Should be fine I think. The plates across the bottom is required to control flexing. Some people use pipe for spacers and do not box the arms. They end up cracking and breaking and they wonder why...
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 05:49 PM
  #13  
jpaulwhite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 217
Originally Posted by Lady72nRob71
R2R is right.
If a sway bar is to be added, the lower arms must be either boxed withthe available weld-in bottom plates with integrated spacers, or just buy aftermarket boxed arms. The latter might be easier and more cost and time efficient, considering they will have new bushings pressed in and will be prepainted.

AVOID the temptation to use chunks of pipe for spacers without enclosing the bottoms of the arms. I have heard of this being done and the arms will flex, fatigue, and break soon.

Shims may be needed also. Never tighten the sway bar bolts down if there is a gap between the arm and sway bar.
Ca you elaborate on this a bit? I have a 70 Olds 98 and my drivers side lower control arm broke on the inner side right next to the ball joint. I always wondered what caused it to break as I didn't really drive the car hard at all. I do remember installing poly sway bar end link bushings on the front sway bar and there may have been an inch of space on the ends before I tightened them up (Just to where they were at when I took them off.

Think that may be why it broke?
Old Dec 15, 2009 | 06:46 PM
  #14  
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,798
From: Plano, TX
Originally Posted by jpaulwhite

Think that may be why it broke?
It could have been a contributing factor.

The above thread deal only with the rear control arms. The front arms were never boxed.
The failure could have stemmed from flawed metal, a previous owner driving it hard, high mileage and rust. One HARD smack over a curb can cause severe fatigue, also.
Old Dec 16, 2009 | 12:05 PM
  #15  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,698
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by jpaulwhite
Ca you elaborate on this a bit? I have a 70 Olds 98 and my drivers side lower control arm broke on the inner side right next to the ball joint. I always wondered what caused it to break as I didn't really drive the car hard at all. I do remember installing poly sway bar end link bushings on the front sway bar and there may have been an inch of space on the ends before I tightened them up (Just to where they were at when I took them off.

Think that may be why it broke?
The most likely reason is metal fatigue. This is becoming more of a problem as 1960s cars are still driven regularly. The problem is that the process that formed the control arms and bushing holes had a high probability of initiating a crack or even just a scratch in the metal. As metal is cyclically loaded, these initial flaws propagate, leading to outright failure. It is good practice to have control arms (particularly front control arms) magnaflux inspected when you rebuild the front suspension.
Old Dec 16, 2009 | 03:35 PM
  #16  
68conv455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 634
Interesting thread.
The previous owner installed a rear sway bar on my 68 cutlass. The control arms are standard "open" type. I'm going to seriously consider an upgrade. Haven't thought much about this till now.
Also, FYI, one hard smack over a curb doesn't cause a fatigue failure. Tens, thousands or billions of smacks could cause fatigue failure, as fatigue failures are caused by repetitive stress cycles. So, the last hard smack could have been the final cycle that caused a fatigue failure.
It's nice to see other Engineers on this board.
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #17  
Destructor's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 743
From: Braintree, Mass
Being a civil engineer, I drive my oldsmobile over and under what we design!
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 06:35 PM
  #18  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Yes. The FE2 suspension package was an available option.
FE2 also includes axle bracing in addition to the boxed control arms and swaybar.
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 01:12 PM
  #19  
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,515
From: South River, New Jersey
saw these on flea bay

I was wondering if they were any good?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/68-72...Q5fAccessories
I see brothers selling the original style ones, year one seems pricey at 139 each for the lowers? I have original boxed arms but they are pitted also have the original sway bar I want to use
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 02:55 PM
  #20  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,698
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Eddie Hansen
I was wondering if they were any good?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/68-72...Q5fAccessories
I see brothers selling the original style ones, year one seems pricey at 139 each for the lowers? I have original boxed arms but they are pitted also have the original sway bar I want to use
I have two problems with the upper arms in that ad. First, the use of polyurethane bushings at all locations will lead to binding in the suspension. The geometry of the four link suspension requires the upper arms to twist slightly as the suspension articulates. The stock rubber bushings have enough compliance to absorb this motion. Polyurethane bushings do not. The better upper arms have a metal ball fitting at the front end to accommodate this motion. Second, the round tubing may actually be less stiff than the stock upper arms due to the smaller cross section. One would need to compare the moments of inertia of the two to know for sure.
Old Jan 5, 2010 | 04:03 PM
  #21  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by Eddie Hansen
I was wondering if they were any good?
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/68-72...Q5fAccessories
I see brothers selling the original style ones, year one seems pricey at 139 each for the lowers? I have original boxed arms but they are pitted also have the original sway bar I want to use
If you already have OEM parts, just clean them up and repaint them. Same with the rear sway bar. I bought a set of rear sway bars that were fairly extensively pitted, but they cleaned up really nice. Couple of coats of sandable primer to fill in some little pits and then some black, they'll look like new. Right now it's too cold to paint and I'm not allowed to do this in the house.
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 12:39 PM
  #22  
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,515
From: South River, New Jersey
Thanks for the advice..

I'll try to find the stock replacement ones but at a better price...


I really think the boxed ones are too far gone, I have sand blasted them and painted with POR -15 then GM chasis black but after thinking about some of the comments regarding them being stamped steel well, I think in the scheme of things it would be cheap insurance LOL... I know what ya mean it is dang cold in my garage too! Thanks for the advice gents.
Old Jan 6, 2010 | 06:47 PM
  #23  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by Eddie Hansen
I'll try to find the stock replacement ones but at a better price...


I really think the boxed ones are too far gone, I have sand blasted them and painted with POR -15 then GM chasis black but after thinking about some of the comments regarding them being stamped steel well, I think in the scheme of things it would be cheap insurance LOL... I know what ya mean it is dang cold in my garage too! Thanks for the advice gents.
If yours are too far gone, just find a good set of open control arms and weld in the box inserts. That's all they did at the factory. Costs a whole lot less than going out and buying a boxed set if you can do it yourself or know someone who can mig it for you. The inserts aren't all that expensive. A new 1" sway bar can be had for cheap. I got mine from Bowtie restorations for around 75 bucks. Fits nice.
Old Jan 8, 2010 | 12:37 PM
  #24  
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,515
From: South River, New Jersey
Thanks for the advice..

thanks I might just go that route, but then with the new rubber bushings etc, having them pressed out and in, I can do the welding, have a mig, not a great mig but a mig... it is a good idea I'll weigh the pros and cons, I have the sway bar already it is an original also sand blasted, por 15'd and then painted. I really got to get moving on my project, I need to lower the body back onto the finished frame so I can do the quarter repair/replacement. it is really daunting getting this all back together. I know to eat an elephant one bite at a time LOL.....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JSGD1966
Parts Wanted
4
Oct 5, 2010 08:26 PM
tim72
Drivetrain/Differentials
9
May 25, 2009 08:24 AM
hamm36
Suspension & Handling
3
May 23, 2009 09:55 AM
Olds luvr
Parts Wanted
3
Jan 19, 2009 06:35 AM
z11375ss
Chassis/Body/Frame
4
Jul 26, 2008 06:04 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:29 AM.