93-97 Jeep Grand Cherokee Steering Box swap w/ Pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 4th, 2016, 02:56 PM
  #121  
"Trying to fix her right"
 
dfire25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 749
Interesting information Easy. Just so happens I finished (that's a relative term) my winter projects, so I started up the car today. After letting it warm up and fixing a trans cooling line leak, I drove it up and down the block a few times to test things out. My new gear box (Lares 1353) is COMPLETELY different then my stock gear box. It's A LOT firmer, tighter, and is 2.5 turns lock to lock. My old gear box was real loose and it felt like I could turn it with my pinky. Granted I still need to do an alignment because I replaced the front control arms with tubular ones, but it feels really nice. As of right now I'm very happy with the upgrade.
dfire25 is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 04:22 AM
  #122  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
I'm curious about what the difference is between the stock 70 & later box and the JGC one. Does the JGC box "feel" better? I always thought all the GM steering boxes were the long ratio boxes but apparently I was mistaken. This guy (Carhex) is on Facebook and V8 Buick selling factory replacement 12.7.1 ratio 3 turns lock to lock boxes for $120 shipped if you have the same box to return as a core. If you have the wider ratio boxes it's $160. (He charges an $80 core charge and refunds $80 if it's the same box and $40 if it's not). It's a direct replacement box so there's no screwing around with adapters. Personally I need to replace the rag joint anyway so I'm not going to save anything there. I think a Lares JGC box is around $110 + shipping including the core charge at Rock Auto so there probably isn't a huge difference in price by the time you pay the return shipping for the Carhex core.




http://www.v8buick.com/archive/index.php/t-287803.html?


http://www.v8buick.com/archive/index.php/t-284639.html?


http://www.v8buick.com/showthread.ph...x-steering-box
allyolds68 is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 05:46 AM
  #123  
Beer Connoisseur
 
70cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Daly City, California
Posts: 2,091
Originally Posted by eazy
So I spoke to Lares this morning. Got some interesting input from them. The guy was very helpful, but I believe he was slightly mistaken. I asked him about my application and the 1353 box and which ragjoint to use. He told me the 1353 gear box has a half moon shaped shaft and will not work properly with the 202 ragjoint. Further more, he told me, or I believe he was telling me, that the 973 gear box was the same exact box as the 1353, only it came with the ragjoint and doesn't have the o-ring connectors. So, he said the 1353 features the same components and feel per say as the OE A-body boxes, which again is the 973. Furthermore, they claim the upgraded box, the 974 which is what RetroRanger used to great success, is really what I would need for an upgraded feel. Finally, the nice feller on the phone noted that the 970 box was identical to the 973, only one of them has a 3 hole mount, and the other a 4 hole mount. I believe the 970 has the 4 hole mount with the extra tab just sticking out or something. Basically he said the 970 box was an exact replica to the factory box, more for show cars, where the 973 was a direct replacement. Hmmmmm any thoughts? What do you 1353 box guys have to say about his comment that the 1353 is not an upgrade from the stock box?
So since 974 would be direct swap, why are people opting for 1353? I've RetroRanger's post about this and now I'm even more confused. Will 974 give me a tighter and firmer steering?
70cutty is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 06:02 AM
  #124  
"Trying to fix her right"
 
dfire25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by 70cutty
So since 974 would be direct swap, why are people opting for 1353? I've RetroRanger's post about this and now I'm even more confused. Will 974 give me a tighter and firmer steering?
Maybe because the 1353 box is $106 at Rockauto, and the 974 box is $212? That's why I went with the 1353. My total with rag joint and shipping was $132.
dfire25 is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 06:11 AM
  #125  
"Trying to fix her right"
 
dfire25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by allyolds68
I'm curious about what the difference is between the stock 70 & later box and the JGC one. Does the JGC box "feel" better? I always thought all the GM steering boxes were the long ratio boxes but apparently I was mistaken. This guy (Carhex) is on Facebook and V8 Buick selling factory replacement 12.7.1 ratio 3 turns lock to lock boxes for $120 shipped if you have the same box to return as a core. If you have the wider ratio boxes it's $160. (He charges an $80 core charge and refunds $80 if it's the same box and $40 if it's not). It's a direct replacement box so there's no screwing around with adapters. Personally I need to replace the rag joint anyway so I'm not going to save anything there. I think a Lares JGC box is around $110 + shipping including the core charge at Rock Auto so there probably isn't a huge difference in price by the time you pay the return shipping for the Carhex core. [/URL]
Mike I seen the same post on Facebook, and had I noticed it sooner, I might have gone this route. But I'm very happy with the 1353 box at this point. I guess "feel" is very subjective, but to me my box feels a hundred times better then my stock one. I thought all steering boxes were the same too, but I always wondered why by buddies 69 Chevelle's steering was much firmer then mine.

Last edited by dfire25; March 5th, 2016 at 06:14 AM.
dfire25 is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 07:06 AM
  #126  
Beer Connoisseur
 
70cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Daly City, California
Posts: 2,091
Originally Posted by dfire25
Maybe because the 1353 box is $106 at Rockauto, and the 974 box is $212? That's why I went with the 1353. My total with rag joint and shipping was $132.
The price is the only difference between the 2? Sorry I am just trying to understand this, as I am about to order mine.
70cutty is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 07:34 AM
  #127  
"Trying to fix her right"
 
dfire25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by 70cutty
The price is the only difference between the 2? Sorry I am just trying to understand this, as I am about to order mine.
I have no idea. I was going back and forth about which box to order as well, but being budget minded I just made a decision and went with it. I figured it was cheep enough, and if I didn't like it I'd just get the more expensive one later. Lares is very vague with the specs on thier website so that doesn't help. I guess you might have to call them. I just know mine worked out well for me.
dfire25 is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 01:28 PM
  #128  
Registered User
 
lemoldsnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Redmond, Oregon
Posts: 3,336
I bought a Jeep GC box this week at a wrecking yard for $50 will put this on the 67 442 we are restoring now. Might do one on the convertible as well. Then I have the 70 so Might do a few of these.
lemoldsnut is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 03:04 PM
  #129  
72 Olds CS
 
RetroRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
I have the 974 as noted above,

1353 box $57 + 2 couplers $30 + rag joint $20= ~$117

974 comes w coupler and uses stock hoses 162.79 on rock auto there is a$50 core i assume the same as the 1353, if you use the RA selection for return ship its like $8 to return the core.

i dont know the difference in the 1353 and 974

the 974 improved the steering feel dramtically has a pleasing on ctr feel and 90 degree turns require far less steering input i couldnt be happier. but my old rag joint was whipped, the old box had more play than donald trump and it leaked more oil than the exxon valdez.

you probably cant go wrong w either choice but i liked the no adapter option of the 974
RetroRanger is offline  
Old March 5th, 2016, 04:10 PM
  #130  
"Trying to fix her right"
 
dfire25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 749
Yes the 1353 has a core charge. Like I said, I decided to keep my old box so it would have been $50 cheaper.

$107 for the box + $17 for the rag joint +$9 shipping = $133 - $50 core charge = $83 total

Man for $83 bucks you can't go wrong with this upgrade!

Oops, I almost failed to mention the adapters which were like $14

So for under $100 bucks you have a completely different feel.
dfire25 is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 05:38 AM
  #131  
Registered User
 
rktolds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Olympia,WA
Posts: 1,731
Has anyone pulled one from a yard? Any special tools besides ratchets and wrenches? The local pull a part has a few of these JGC and I need some boxes for projects.
I did this swap on my 72 and love it. Buddy's 71 S and my 72 wagon are getting it too.
rktolds is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 06:50 AM
  #132  
Registered User
 
4speed455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Modesto CA
Posts: 1,577
If your going to pull one from a junk yard you will need a pitman arm puller. I suggest you take off the pitman arms while the boxes are still mounted to the frame.
4speed455 is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 06:56 AM
  #133  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
I pulled one a couple of months ago, and left two others.

My guy charges me $35 each for them, so I thought I'd grab all three if I could, but circumstances weren't right for all of them - positions of vehicles, other parts removed, etc.

The connection between the steering box and the pitman arm is a tough MF under the best of conditions, and on your back in the grease and poison ivy is not the best, but your best bet is always to do the job with the steering box on the car, so I would recommend a stout socket and a long pipe, as well as a pitman arm puller, so you can at least give it a good shot - if you fail, then have a tie rod end puller to get the other end of the pitman arm disconnected, and you can relieve the edges of the pitman arm with a whizzer at home and whack it off.

The hoses can usually be unscrewed without a problem, or they can just be cut.

The steering column connection has never been a problem for me, not have the three long bolts that connect the steering box to the frame.

After you take it off, it's not a bad idea to invert it over some unimportant surface and crank the steering column end lock to lock a bunch of times to spit out all of the ATF that you can, otherwise it will end up where you don't want it.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 07:13 AM
  #134  
Registered User
 
eazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Malvern, PA (Hometown) Williamsport, PA (College)
Posts: 131
I just want to clear up some confusion because this is sorta getting all over the place.

Lares 1353 steering gear ($106.89) + Lares 200 ragjoint ($16.25)+ O-Ring connectors (NAPA $20) = JGC setup on olds ($143.14)

Lares 973 = A-body setup, comes with ragjoint, and features the same style hose connections as the stock A-body setup, 3 hole mount ($131.79)

Lares 970 = OEM style Olds box. Same exact box as the 973, but has the extra tab that sticks out from factory. Box only. I guess GM used the same box with different internals on several cars, so they stuck with a 4 hole mount for all boxes? ($154.99)

Lares 974 = 10:1 steeting ratio. TIGHT. Lares "Performance" box, which the man from Lares told me has IROC internals, whatever that means. Comes with ragjoint, and accepts stock power steering lines. ($212.79)

NOW, the original purpose of this thread was to inform users of a cheap alternative to the stock box. You still can go to the junkyard and get a Jeep box for approx. $50 and a ragjoint for $5 from an early 80's GM pickup. Just remember to cut off the jeep hoses about a foot off the box, go to NAPA and get two flare couplings for $10 and you're done for about $70 plus your gas and time.

It seems that we can agree the Jeep box is an upgrade from the pinky steer we have with our old factory boxes. Confusion arose, mostly brought on by me, about the currently available options.

I believe Lares was wrong when they told me the 1353 jeep box is the same as the 973 A-Body box. It seems that the 1353 box brings these cars to 2.5 turns lock to lock, down from 3.5 turns. Also seems to bring a tighter feel.

Another thing Lares could not answer for me is that it seems the factory '96 JGC box would have a full 360 degree spline connector, which is why it would have worked with the Lares 200 coupling. It seems that the Lares reman boxes feature their own parts and combos. They know what their parts are compatible for, but I believe they may have changed the shaft where it accepts the ragjoint.

My next question is to those of you that used the dorman part with the 1353 box. Does that ragjoint have a flat side on the top where it goes on the shaft?

Hope this can clear some things up. I'm still pondering which setup to get, hoping to make a decision sometime this afternoon

Last edited by eazy; March 7th, 2016 at 03:34 AM. Reason: Too many numbers
eazy is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 07:19 AM
  #135  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by eazy
I guess GM used the same box with different internals on several cars, so they stuck with a 4 hole mount for all boxes?
GM used four fastening screws on some models, especially trucks.
The fourth lug doesn't interfere with anything on the three-lug models, but is not "accurate" in appearance.


Originally Posted by eazy
... the man from Lares told me has IROC internals, whatever that means.
The same internals as the IROC Z-28 Camaro (early eighties, if I recall), which was the box everyone used to go looking for, before they were all finally crushed several years ago.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 08:25 AM
  #136  
"Trying to fix her right"
 
dfire25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by eazy
My next question is to those of you that used the dorman part with the 1353 box. Does that ragjoint have a flat side on the top where it goes on the shaft?
Dorman part? Must have missed that one.
dfire25 is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 08:31 AM
  #137  
"Trying to fix her right"
 
dfire25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Bartlett IL
Posts: 749
Originally Posted by eazy
Lares 1353 steering gear ($106.89) + Lares 202 ragjoint ($16.25)+ O-Ring connectors (NAPA $20) = JGC setup on olds ($143.14)
They recommend the Lares 200 rag joint for the 1353, not the 202. It states that on Rockauto's and Lares website. Might be the same, but they say 200.
dfire25 is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 08:42 AM
  #138  
Registered User
 
eazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Malvern, PA (Hometown) Williamsport, PA (College)
Posts: 131
Oh, my mistake, the 202 is the one he said is not correct. The 202 has a 360 spline style. He said the splines will line up, but between 10-2 oclock there will be nothing and it will slip
eazy is offline  
Old March 6th, 2016, 09:43 AM
  #139  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Originally Posted by eazy
Oh, my mistake, the 202 is the one he said is not correct. The 202 has a 360 spline style. He said the splines will line up, but between 10-2 oclock there will be nothing and it will slip

Your previous post where you mention the 202 is a very nice summary. You should go back and edit it to correct it for the 200
allyolds68 is offline  
Old March 14th, 2016, 09:11 PM
  #140  
Registered User
 
young olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt Vernon,WA
Posts: 1,966
for anyone else that needs reassurance before doing the swap, ive finally driven mine and its great! i went from manual steering and a stock huge wheel to the jgc box and a grant wheel(13" iirc) and i absolutely love the feel. nice and firm, not quite as hard as manual but you definitely know your steering something. and the steering is way faster, new box is half the turns lock to lock as the stock one.
young olds is online now  
Old March 16th, 2016, 07:00 AM
  #141  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Is there any way to tell if a JGC steering box is in good shape in the yard? I took a walk through the local yard at lunch yesterday and the steering wheels are locked and typically the wheels are sunk in the mud. The odometers are digital so you can't even check mileage. If you have a jump pack can you get the odometer to turn on? The yard has no records that they give on any vehicles. Do these boxes typically not wear out?
allyolds68 is offline  
Old March 16th, 2016, 08:10 PM
  #142  
Registered User
 
young olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt Vernon,WA
Posts: 1,966
Idk, mine is from a junkyard. I figure it came out of a car that's 30 years newer it'll at least be better then what I took out
young olds is online now  
Old March 17th, 2016, 08:40 AM
  #143  
Ben
Thread Starter
 
RAMBOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 1,827
When the JGC swap was first written up back around 2000-2001, those cars were only 5-6 years old and just starting to appear in wrecking yards usually with low miles. Now they are approaching 20 years old... So its a crap shoot.

The box i got had been messed with and the stiff input valving & t-bar swapped out for lesser componets- i was never very happy with it- Others have gotten great working boxes and have been thrilled.
For my one "bad" box, i know at least 10 guys who got good ones and were happy.

If you want to 100% be happy, buy a 12:7:1 AGR box from summit. $300 and you will be 100% satisfied.... Or buy a similar quick ratio, firm input reman box from one of the known steering box builders (red head gear, power steering service, etc etc)

Or pull a JGC box from a wrecking yard for $30 and roll the dice. Its still a good cheap option and odds are very good that it will be ok. You could pull several junk yard boxes and still be ahead of the price of an AGR or reman box.

Just some thoughts.
-Ben
RAMBOW is offline  
Old March 17th, 2016, 10:54 AM
  #144  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Originally Posted by RAMBOW
Just some thoughts.
-Ben

Thanks. I found a 130k mile one on Craigslist for $25 that I'm picking up Saturday. It will keep me from crawling around in the mud at the junk yard and if it's a POS it will satisfy my core charge from Rock Auto.
allyolds68 is offline  
Old March 18th, 2016, 09:42 PM
  #145  
Registered User
 
young olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt Vernon,WA
Posts: 1,966
im am absolutely %100 satisfied with my junkyard box, if i wasnt it doesnt take much to pull back off an use it as a core. but mine feels pretty stinkin tight for used, btw i only have about $130 in my complete swap from manual to power jgc.
young olds is online now  
Old April 13th, 2016, 01:29 PM
  #146  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Hey, Kids! Looks like Lee Power Steering is back in business!



http://leepowersteering.com/

- Eric

Last edited by MDchanic; December 24th, 2016 at 08:38 PM. Reason: updated link
MDchanic is offline  
Old April 13th, 2016, 01:51 PM
  #147  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
I ordered the gearbox and joint from Rock Auto this AM. I'll use the $25 Craigslist one for the $50 core charge. I ordered the adapters from Summit. Hopefully all my part numbers were correct. It didn't make sense to use a 130,000 mile box when I could get a remanufactured one for like $58.
allyolds68 is offline  
Old April 13th, 2016, 02:06 PM
  #148  
Registered User
 
DurasII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 96
Originally Posted by allyolds68
I ordered the gearbox and joint from Rock Auto this AM. I'll use the $25 Craigslist one for the $50 core charge. I ordered the adapters from Summit. Hopefully all my part numbers were correct. It didn't make sense to use a 130,000 mile box when I could get a remanufactured one for like $58.

Which one did you order Mike?
I'm thinking of ordering the Lares 973 comes with joint and it is a direct connect for the hose's. $130.79 -$50.00 core charge comes to $80.79.
DurasII is offline  
Old April 13th, 2016, 03:56 PM
  #149  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Originally Posted by DurasII
Which one did you order Mike?
I'm thinking of ordering the Lares 973 comes with joint and it is a direct connect for the hose's. $130.79 -$50.00 core charge comes to $80.79.
I ordered the Lares 1353 box with the Lares 200 joint
allyolds68 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2016, 07:56 AM
  #150  
Registered User
 
DurasII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 96
Originally Posted by allyolds68
I ordered the Lares 1353 box with the Lares 200 joint
You'll have to let me know how that one works out for ya. I will do the same.
DurasII is offline  
Old April 14th, 2016, 08:01 AM
  #151  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Originally Posted by DurasII
You'll have to let me know how that one works out for ya. I will do the same.
The total out of pocket was less than $100 (plus the $25 I paid for the core) so I'm hoping it works out too. I've got to believe the rebuilt one is better than the rusty POS I got for $25.
allyolds68 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2016, 01:19 PM
  #152  
Registered User
 
DurasII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 96
Smile

Originally Posted by allyolds68
The total out of pocket was less than $100 (plus the $25 I paid for the core) so I'm hoping it works out too. I've got to believe the rebuilt one is better than the rusty POS I got for $25.
Yup exactly my thought process. A rebuilt has to be better. I should also be out of pocket around the $100 area. Haven't ordered it yet but will shortly. Still trying to figure out the wiring for the FM power antenna...
DurasII is offline  
Old April 15th, 2016, 06:28 AM
  #153  
Registered User
 
therobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 3,139
If Lees back on and you want to spend the $$$ its a piece of art.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_0985.JPG (1.04 MB, 67 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_1031.JPG (1.26 MB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_2944.JPG (63.1 KB, 48 views)
therobski is online now  
Old April 15th, 2016, 07:09 AM
  #154  
Registered User
 
DurasII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bloomington, MN
Posts: 96
Originally Posted by therobski
If Lees back on and you want to spend the $$$ its a piece of art.
It sure looks like it's nice...what does he get for that kind of work?
DurasII is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 06:33 AM
  #155  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Did anyone have an issue with the coupler being off one or two splines?


In a side by side comparison with a spare 68 box I have it appears the couplers are not lined up in the same location when turned to lock in either direction. I'm pretty sure this can be adjusted out of the steering linkage but I was just wondering if anyone else experienced this. I hate it when my steering wheel isn't centered.
allyolds68 is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 06:36 AM
  #156  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Nope. Mine was dead on.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 06:46 AM
  #157  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Nope. Mine was dead on.

- Eric

It can really only go back together one way, correct?
allyolds68 is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 06:50 AM
  #158  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by allyolds68
It can really only go back together one way, correct?
"In theory"...

(actually, there are four ways to fit the pittman arm, but three won't work, and sometimes you can get the input shaft off by a spline, but it's a bit hard to).

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old April 19th, 2016, 07:00 AM
  #159  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,291
Originally Posted by MDchanic
"In theory"...

(actually, there are four ways to fit the pittman arm, but three won't work, and sometimes you can get the input shaft off by a spline, but it's a bit hard to).

- Eric

I'm good with the pitman arm. You can definitely get the input shaft off by one spline with the box and rag joint I just bought, but it would be in the wrong direction anyway

I'm sure it will sort itself out when I put it all together


BTW the total $$$ for this change is as follows

Craigslist Core Pump $25


Rock Auto

Lares 1353 steering box $56.89
Core Charge $50 (will get this back because I bought the $25 CL box)
Dorman 31011 rag joint $16.13
Shipping $26.27

Summit Racing

Borgeson 925122 hose adapters $14.25
Shipping $5.95


Total cost including credit for core charge = $144.49

Last edited by allyolds68; April 19th, 2016 at 07:18 AM.
allyolds68 is offline  
Old April 26th, 2016, 08:00 PM
  #160  
Registered User
 
71cutlass350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Dubuque, Iowa
Posts: 214
Im going to do the Jeep GC box swap and I need to get new hoses regardless. Are there any lines that both end will bolt right up or do I have to either use the flare adapters or attach new ends?
71cutlass350 is offline  


Quick Reply: 93-97 Jeep Grand Cherokee Steering Box swap w/ Pics



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34 AM.