The Clubhouse Place to chat about whatever's on your mind - doesn't have to be car related. NO POLITICS OR RELIGIOUS DISCUSSION ALLOWED.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Old Sep 17, 2009 | 07:57 PM
  #1  
gillbates's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

Is more depraved than ACORN.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CU-k...layer_embedded
Old Sep 17, 2009 | 09:35 PM
  #2  
Dan Wirth's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 470
From: The Southwest
That was odd. The 59 Chevy crumpled like a coke can. They must be making stronger frames these days. What a terrible waste of a classic.
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 03:18 AM
  #3  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,086
From: Too close to Toronto!!
Angry Capt. Crunch

I am not sure but I think the '59 only has an X frame and the 'Institute' set up the display anyway and knew it's faults and set it up for maximum damage in the most vulnerable area where it would fold in on itself...
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 07:39 AM
  #4  
citcapp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,127
From: Rathdrum, Idano
Did you notice the rust looks like the frame on the 59 was rusted out. East coast car from the rust belt maybe?
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 09:52 AM
  #5  
Oldsguy's Avatar
Past Administrator
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,359
From: Rural Waxahachie Texas
Sick people wasting a nice car like that. What does it really prove comparing apples to oranges to justify an agency's existence? Let us compare any 1959 item with a 2009 item of similar purpose in a destructive show, say......an airplane, or......a train, or.....a house. Let's crash two houses together! SHEESH!
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 09:56 AM
  #6  
bulldog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 467
From: Toronto,Ontario
Even after seeing that from all angles, I still have a hard time believing it.
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 10:54 AM
  #7  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,060
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by Oldsguy
Sick people wasting a nice car like that. What does it really prove comparing apples to oranges to justify an agency's existence? Let us compare any 1959 item with a 2009 item of similar purpose in a destructive show, say......an airplane, or......a train, or.....a house. Let's crash two houses together! SHEESH!

My money would be on the 59 house plaster vs. sheet rock, real 2 X 4's and 4 X 4's in corners. No contest
Old Sep 18, 2009 | 10:57 AM
  #8  
gearheads78's Avatar
car guy
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,675
From: Dallas TX
Originally Posted by bulldog
Even after seeing that from all angles, I still have a hard time believing it.
I agree. To show a more dramatic difference. It would not shock me a bit if we found out there was some engineered weakness was put into that 59.

I have seen plenty of crunched old cars and they just don't disintegrate like that. It fact what usually hurt and killed people in old cars is the cars not absorbing the impact. The cars held up and the people inside bounced around.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
455man
Wheels and Tires
43
Jun 13, 2012 02:50 PM
66ninetyeightls
Ninety-Eight
8
Sep 13, 2011 12:18 PM
cnewp000
The Newbie Forum
13
May 28, 2010 05:55 AM
Oldsmaniac
General Discussion
8
May 26, 2010 10:18 AM
AZ442
442
18
Oct 31, 2009 05:06 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM.