Cars For Sale Please read forum guidelines before posting.

1968 Ram Rod on Ebay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 04:57 PM
  #1  
italian ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 306
From: Deer Park, IL - NW Chgo Sub.
1968 Ram Rod on Ebay

These don't pop up that often. NOT MINE OOPS that should be EBAY

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1968-...10641765070?pt



=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item4853b12ace#v4-41

Last edited by italian ice; Mar 29, 2013 at 05:01 PM.
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 05:55 PM
  #2  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Nice car, and relatively rare. Pre-cursor to the W31 cars of 1969/70
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 05:56 PM
  #3  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
StickW31,

Is that the Saffron Cutlass S 4 speed you sold a few years ago?
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:36 PM
  #4  
RALLYE KID's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 717
From: CHICAGO
Your right Italian ice you don't see to my Ramrods. You see more 70's then 68-69 31's
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:39 PM
  #5  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
What makes anyone think this is a real Ram Rod except stickers on the fenders and manual brakes? You'd think if you were selling the real deal you'd post at least one pic of the Ram Rod specific parts.
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 06:40 PM
  #6  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,325
From: NJ
Cool, but where are the OAI component pictures??
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 07:10 PM
  #7  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
By the looks of where the washer pump suction hose is going, this car likely does not have the ram air set up on it. The hose is always routed to the pass side on ram air applications because the washer bottle was relocated on passenger fender well on RamRods.

Last edited by 66trakpak; Mar 29, 2013 at 07:13 PM.
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 08:11 PM
  #8  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by allyolds68
What makes anyone think this is a real Ram Rod except stickers on the fenders and manual brakes? You'd think if you were selling the real deal you'd post at least one pic of the Ram Rod specific parts.
You mean like the SMT and dual exhausts shown in the pics? I agree the fender clips and ram air tubes, inlets and air breather would be a nice add on to the pics.

I read somewhere that there were only around 500 Ramrod 350s made in 68. I don't know any way to validate the RR350 through VIN or cowl. Doesn't it need some paperwork?
Old Mar 29, 2013 | 09:37 PM
  #9  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,494
From: Muskegon, Mi.
Yep, gotta have paperwork to verify.
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 04:02 AM
  #10  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
Originally Posted by Allan R
You mean like the SMT and dual exhausts shown in the pics? I agree the fender clips and ram air tubes, inlets and air breather would be a nice add on to the pics.

I read somewhere that there were only around 500 Ramrod 350s made in 68. I don't know any way to validate the RR350 through VIN or cowl. Doesn't it need some paperwork?
The guy has gone through great lengths to include pics that do not show things like the washer fluid bottle location (referenced above), under bumper scoops or brackets, inner fenders, and balancer. There's no way to validate anything through the VIN or cowl other than they have to be Lansing cars. These cars are rarely documented and easily cloned.
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 06:19 AM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,849
From: Northern VA
Interesting that the car is in Springfield, OH but has VA plates in the photo. I doubt the O.A.I. air cleaner fits on that Holley, so who knows if he still has it (or any other of the "rair" parts). I zoomed in on the photo of the front of the car and MAYBE you can just make out the outside edge of the driver's side scoop, but then again, maybe not.
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 06:28 AM
  #12  
italian ice's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 306
From: Deer Park, IL - NW Chgo Sub.
The 4 speed and decals draws you in, but as most of you have said based on the pics there's nothing convincing that its real.

Joe to answer your air cleaner question.

Posted in the Q&A:

Questions and answers about this item

Q: Nice Olds,Do you have the ram air system? Replacement moter or original? Thanks
A: NUMBERS MATCHING EVERTHING, EXCEPT HEADERS,DO NOT HAVE THE AIR CLEANER
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 06:33 AM
  #13  
Nilsson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,076
From: Columbus, OH
I have asked a couple specific questions waiting on answers. Depending on what response I get I may go look at car. It is only 45 miles from where I live.
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 06:50 AM
  #14  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
The shifter isn't even original.

Sorry to pick it apart but I don't like people that are less than truthful
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 08:00 AM
  #15  
junior supercar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,620
From: suburbs of Chicago
where is all the body line peak moldings? I don't believe I even see mounting holes for them
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 08:29 AM
  #16  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
I am used to seeing the much longer arm rest bases [chromed plastic part] on 1968 models. Maybe that's an early/ late production difference? Ignition switch escutcheon looks different. W/o the documentation it's hard to justify a high price for that Cutlass.
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 09:21 AM
  #17  
vette442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,790
From: McMurray, PA
Yes, that's stickw31 Steve's old car. Canadian built M20 car but not a Ram Rod. I'd love to own that car.

The guy in Richmond who bought it from him let it sit outside for a couple winters based on pics from when he was trying to sell it on Ebay last year. That sure didn't help the body condition.
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 09:36 AM
  #18  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,849
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by vette442
Yes, that's stickw31 Steve's old car. Canadian built M20 car but not a Ram Rod. I'd love to own that car.
Yup, not if it's Canadian built (though that does mean you can get the build sheet documentation)

The guy in Richmond who bought it from him let it sit outside for a couple winters based on pics from when he was trying to sell it on Ebay last year. That sure didn't help the body condition.
Yes, but to be honest, it's a 4 spd car with rally pac, so price isn't THAT far out of line.
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 12:39 PM
  #19  
StickW31's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 823
From: Meriden CT
Ok guys . This is NOT. Ram rod . I used to own it. Has my "Cas Am performance " sticker still on the drivers quarter window. Also a Cabadian built car. Rear numbers matiching 350 4 speed car. I sure do miss it
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 12:48 PM
  #20  
vette442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,790
From: McMurray, PA
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Yes, but to be honest, it's a 4 spd car with rally pac, so price isn't THAT far out of line.
Totally agree if the underside is rock solid. I was interested in it when the guy in Richmond had it for sale, but he wasn't the easiest seller to work with when it came to getting info and more detailed pics. I was interested in it when Steve had it for sale before that. I still had one of my '68 post coupes at the time so I passed...
Terry
Old Mar 30, 2013 | 01:05 PM
  #21  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
So, now that we know it's NOT a RR350 and the seller says the car is 'breaking out' (with rust is a good guess) indicating not likely 'rock solid', what is a good price?
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 07:10 AM
  #22  
vette442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,790
From: McMurray, PA
He removed the Ram Rod references, but upped the starting bid $3,000. Now the price is out of line. He's supposed to be sending me pics of the underside, door bottoms, etc.
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 07:54 AM
  #23  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,849
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by vette442
He removed the Ram Rod references, but upped the starting bid $3,000. Now the price is out of line.
Yup. When I said that $7500 was close, I was thinking that the starting price should be around $6000-6500. Unfortunately, I see this a lot - something doesn't sell on ebay, so it gets relisted with a higher starting price.
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 08:25 AM
  #24  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
Originally Posted by Allan R
Nice car, and relatively rare. Pre-cursor to the W31 cars of 1969/70
Am I the only one who doesn't agree with this characterization? I consider it a W-31. What say you, Oldsmofolks?
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 10:14 AM
  #25  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
Originally Posted by Diego
Am I the only one who doesn't agree with this characterization? I consider it a W-31. What say you, Oldsmofolks?
I don't agree with you

W31 was an option code in 68. It's name was Ram Rod
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 10:16 AM
  #26  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
But it's still a W-31, no?

What do you call a '68 W-30? Ram Rod 400?

Perhaps the way Oldsmobile marketed the '68 sorted itself out by branding the W-Machines for '69, but I don't think it changes a thing. What do Chevy people call the 1967 Z/28? No badges, no nothing other than a "Z28 performance package" on the order form, but is it not a Z?
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 10:20 AM
  #27  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
Originally Posted by Diego
But it's still a W-31, no?

What do you call a '68 W-30? Ram Rod 400?

Perhaps the way Oldsmobile marketed the '68 sorted itself out by branding the W-Machines for '69, but I don't think it changes a thing. What do Chevy people call the 1967 Z/28? No badges, no nothing other than a "Z28 performance package" on the order form, but is it not a Z?

A 68 W30 was called a W30 and marketed as such

Would you call a 68 non A/C H/O a W45?
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 10:23 AM
  #28  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
According to this ad, there is no mention of the W-30 by name:

Old Mar 31, 2013 | 10:53 AM
  #29  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
Diego,

I can’t put my hands on the marketing brochures but I know I’ve seen them. I‘ve got a book called “Oldsmobile Muscle Cars” by William Holder and Phillip Kunz that states:

“And for the first time, Olds acknowledged the W-30 in company literature, and hinted at the magic of the moniker”

I know there are lots of mistakes in that book but I don’t think that’s one of them.



Dave made a long post on V8Buick a few years ago responding to errors in the 442.com history of the W31 (Ram Rod) and this is an excerpt from it:

Originally Posted by daveh
From 442.com

Technically, the W-31 was onlybuilt in 1969 and 1970. While not called a W-31, the equivalent vehicle wasavailable and called the "Ram Rod 350" in 1968.

Dave’s response:

It wasn't an equivalent vehicle, the optioncode for the Ramrod was W31. It was only called that after the marketing/promoguys got into the act for the 1969 model year with the "DrOldsmobile" promo program. It was still called a Ramrod like the fenderdecals all through the 68 year including the Smothers brothers cars.Unfortunately, the marketing/promo guys got carried away and tried to cash inon the Ramrod reputation from the drag racing successes starting in theSpringnationals of 1968 and throughout that summer. They put "Ramrod"decals on the air cleaners of not only the W31 in 1969, but also the W30 and W32with a "Ramrod 400" designation. The W30's needed all the help theycould get after the word was out on the disappointing performance of the smallbore/long stroke 400 G block that came out in 1968. The 65-67 442's also used a400, but it was a smaller bore 425 with the shorter stroke and were very fast.
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 12:54 PM
  #30  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by allyolds68
W31 was an option code in 68. It's name was Ram Rod
Where would I find that option code Mike? I looked in the SPECS for 68 and can't find it for any of the Cutlass line.
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 01:56 PM
  #31  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Diego
Am I the only one who doesn't agree with this characterization? I consider it a W-31. What say you, Oldsmofolks?
You are correct Diego. The '68 W31 was not a precursor, it was a W31. Officially. And W31 was an option code. The name of this option code was "Force-Air Induction System" specifically spelled out in the Public Relations Release from Oldsmobile.
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 02:09 PM
  #32  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
Thanks for chiming in, Kurt!
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 02:31 PM
  #33  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
Originally Posted by Allan R
Where would I find that option code Mike? I looked in the SPECS for 68 and can't find it for any of the Cutlass line.
The W31 option was late in 67 or early in 68. It doesn't show up in the 68 dealer literature. I'll look around to see if I can the announcement. The first fifty were built in January or February of 68 and they went mostly to race teams. They were built much differently than the later ones.
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 02:39 PM
  #34  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
There are also numerous references to the W31 (as a W31) in the Assembly Manual.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1968 W31.1 specs.jpg (30.4 KB, 49 views)
File Type: jpg
1968 W31.2 specs.jpg (37.5 KB, 37 views)
File Type: jpg
1968 W31.3 specs.jpg (30.0 KB, 35 views)
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 02:58 PM
  #35  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,849
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Diego
What do you call a '68 W-30? Ram Rod 400?
Uh...

Old Mar 31, 2013 | 03:07 PM
  #36  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by wmachine
There are also numerous references to the W31 (as a W31) in the Assembly Manual.
Thank you. Excellent documentation.
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 06:06 PM
  #37  
driverchoice's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 189
isnt that ramrod 400 decal a 69 item
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 06:54 PM
  #38  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,512
From: Seneca Falls, NY
Originally Posted by wmachine
There are also numerous references to the W31 (as a W31) in the Assembly Manual.
Other than references to the option code I'm not seeing where Olds marketed the 68 as a W31. It was known as a Ram Rod 350
Old Mar 31, 2013 | 07:08 PM
  #39  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
The point is that the Ram Rod 350 is not a precursor to the W-31 but IS a W-31 before Oldsmobile started branding the W-Machines.
Old Apr 1, 2013 | 06:03 AM
  #40  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by allyolds68
Other than references to the option code I'm not seeing where Olds marketed the 68 as a W31. It was known as a Ram Rod 350
You're not seeing the W31 being marketed as a W31 on the release announcement from the Public Relations posted above? Where are you seeing it marketed as a Ram Rod? It wasn't really known a Ram Rod because it really wasn't even known, outside of some racing circles.

Originally Posted by Diego
The point is that the Ram Rod 350 is not a precursor to the W-31 but IS a W-31 before Oldsmobile started branding the W-Machines.
The truth is the '68 W31 was not marketed. Same situation as the '66 W30 and they were pretty much conceived, produced, and distributed the same way. Sans marketing. They were purpose built cars. I'm sure the term "Ram Rod" was intended to be a branding identity (as Diego is saying), but it never made it. It wasn't until the '69 advertising campaign came along and promoted the W cars that some identity was being established by marketing.
That was a time period where there was a struggle going on between engineering and marketing. It was certainly not a joint effort. Look at these 2 examples ('66 W30 and '68 W31) of some of the finest performance cars of the era. Where was marketing? Yup, with their thumbs you know where.
Unfortunately, marketing was always a shortcoming of Oldsmobile, and as far as I'm concerned, led the way for Oldsmobile's exit from GM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:04 AM.