Plumbing a Line-Lock

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 09:12 AM
  #1  
Mike H.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 162
From: Damascus, OR
Plumbing a Line-Lock

I'm plumbing the lines for a front disc set up and a line-lock in my '68 Cutlass. I plan on running the front brakes lines in this order:
Master Cylinder - Proportioning Valve - Line/Lock - Distribution Block - Caliper

My main concern is, will it be OK to use the stock distribution block.

Thanks for any help or suggestions.

Mike
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 09:46 AM
  #2  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
Like this?

http://www.hotrod.com/howto/49619_br.../photo_01.html
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 10:35 AM
  #3  
69442C's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,665
From: Maryland
The original distribution block, assuming you are using the factory original or original replacement one for a 68 Cutlass/442, will be fine as it is just a distribution block. It serves no other purpose than to send the fluid to the calipers or wheel cylinders. For 68-70 A body cars, the distribution block was the same for 4 wheel drum or front disc/rear drum. If the car did get front disc brakes, a hold-off valve was installed up near the master cylinder to slightly delay the fluid going to the front calipers. You want to place the line lock on the line that supplies fluid for the front brakes and locate it between the hold off valve and the distribution block since that will give you the most space. It can go between the MC and the hold-off valve too but there's not a lot of brake line to work with between those 2 points.

Brian
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 10:43 AM
  #4  
ah64pilot's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,703
This will give you an idea.

FWIW, I put the lock between the MC and proportioning (combination valve on my car) so that when the line lock is engaged it turns on the "BRAKE" warning light in the fuel cluster. That kept me from having to mount an external warning light.
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 12:06 PM
  #5  
Mike H.'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 162
From: Damascus, OR
Guys,
I appreciate all the feedback. It all helped tremendously. Nice suggestion on the light detail.

Thanks, Mike
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 02:54 PM
  #6  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,026
The type of proportioning valve I used in the mid 1980s was the Mopar adjustable and was intended for the rear brakes, not the front. At the front I would then use master cylinder-line lock-distribution block-front wheels.
Old Jan 30, 2013 | 04:20 PM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by ah64pilot
FWIW, I put the lock between the MC and proportioning (combination valve on my car) so that when the line lock is engaged it turns on the "BRAKE" warning light in the fuel cluster. That kept me from having to mount an external warning light.
Yup, since the differential pressure valve in the distribution block is now sensing a difference in pressure from the front to the back brakes. This is no problem so long as the valve spool doesn't get stuck in that position. That can sometimes happen if there's sludge in the distribution block (it's brass, so it doesn't rust). If the light does stay on, it means that the spool got stuck and you won't have working back brakes.

Note that this is potentially a bigger problem for 1971-up disc brake cars with the cast iron combination valve. That one DOES rust internally, increasing the potential for the spool getting stuck.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mhouston44
Big Blocks
3
Feb 19, 2013 11:33 AM
gearheads78
Non-Oldsmobile Classified
3
Jun 25, 2012 08:51 PM
Nasty455
Small Blocks
11
May 14, 2012 04:12 PM
am99888
The Newbie Forum
4
Mar 30, 2012 08:28 PM
Tedd Thompson
Vintage Oldsmobiles
2
Jul 14, 2011 08:31 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:25 PM.