Deck Height, squish and quench
Deck Height, squish and quench
If Quench is most effective with wedge style chambers and flat top pistons, what about Olds dished pistons design.
If you have a chamber head say 70cc or less and flat top pistons and pistons located down the hole to give you a decent compression ratio. Would this be a better design as compared to a larger chamber, tighter deck height and Olds dished pistons ?
If both scenarios gave you the same compression ratio is one better than the other. A dished piston would not have much or any squish compared to a flat top pistons but the pistons would be down the hole more.
Maybe I'm over thinking this.
If you have a chamber head say 70cc or less and flat top pistons and pistons located down the hole to give you a decent compression ratio. Would this be a better design as compared to a larger chamber, tighter deck height and Olds dished pistons ?
If both scenarios gave you the same compression ratio is one better than the other. A dished piston would not have much or any squish compared to a flat top pistons but the pistons would be down the hole more.
Maybe I'm over thinking this.
You are kind of. Most dished pistons still have a decent amount of flat or “squish” area.
Best combination is a shallow chamber with a dish in the piston. That puts the flame front more in the piston where it belongs.
Best combination is a shallow chamber with a dish in the piston. That puts the flame front more in the piston where it belongs.
Thanks for you input cutlassefi, Everything I have read says to run tight deck clearances for better squish for more turbulent gas mixture and give you better chance at less detonation. I was thinking Dished pistons would give you less of this but a flat top would be better but perhaps it will not be tight enough over the entire surface area and using the cylinder as part of the combustion chamber
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



