Whats your CID and Quadrajet metering rods and jet size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 03:03 PM
  #1  
MN71W30's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,173
From: Somerset Wisconsin
Whats your CID and Quadrajet metering rods and jet size?

I'm running a 455 with a manual transmission, 1971 quadrajet carb, AU rods and 71 jets. The car has never run better. The problem I have now is wondering if there is a better combo for a car running low 13's @ 103mph. Is there anyone out there that has experimented with different combo's and could save me alot of time and trouble? Or has gotten a q-jet too rich?
Thanks for all the help.
Dave
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 06:02 PM
  #2  
Bobsw32's Avatar
BobsW32
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
A common speed trick mistake is to always install thinner (richer) secondary rods. Some engines and carbs will produce a secondary “lag” if the rods are too thin. On about half of the engines I work on, I obtain better performance by installing fatter “non-performance” rods. Again, a quick road test is the only way to set this up, so go back to your 300-foot stretch and make a few runs with rods both richer and leaner. Once you have found the rods producing the smoothest secondary transition and the best numbers, you can start unwinding the secondary airvalve spring. Relax the spring tension in 1/8 turn increments until the car stumbles on acceleration, then tighten up 1/8 turn again. You have now determined the quickest secondary opening rate that your engine can handle, and your secondary mixture is set.

Note that secondary metering rods come in three different tapers: long tip, short tip, and medium tip (see Figure 3). Most of the available after-market metering rods have the long tips, and these will produce a full-rich mixture upon the slightest opening of the secondaries. Many street engines will produce better performance by using the short tipped rods. A short tipped rod does not allow a full-rich mixture until the secondaries are opened quite a ways, keeping the mixture a little lean initially. This can produce smoother and crisper performance in many applications. Next time you see a junk Q-Jet laying around, make sure you yank the rods and jets out of it: many old truck carbs have some really good short-tipped secondary rods in them.


I would try a set of DA rods and or AX rods and see if the motor responds to more more fuel....
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 06:14 PM
  #3  
Bobsw32's Avatar
BobsW32
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
If this were mine I would have a separate carb for the strip that I would eliminate the primary metering rods and plug the inlet for the power piston and then run a 57 or 58 jet and then run something like an AX secondary rod. I would grind about 1/8th inch off the top of the accelerator pump rod, eliminate the internal fuel filter and put a large window needle and seat.......these mods will help
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 08:41 PM
  #4  
MN71W30's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,173
From: Somerset Wisconsin
Wow, I hit the jackpot!! Great info. After I installed the AU rods and 71 jets, I did notice a sight problem that acts like a bad accel pump. I figured I may have damaged it. Is the the lag you mention? I had AK rods and 70 jets before. I'll read through your post a few times and, yes I plan on modifing another q-jet for performance.
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 01:57 AM
  #5  
MX442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 409
From: ID
400 G block, .040 over. 9.75:1, Performer intake, 212/224 .472"/.496"

1977 Chev q-jet
73 mains. .044" custom rods (Ruggles)
DA secondary rods. K hanger.
2800' altitude.
I may go leaner to 72 or 71 main.

I still have some fine tuning to do. Need a wideband or dyno to get it perfect.
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 06:44 AM
  #6  
dc2x4drvr's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,216
From: St Augustine
461, Edelbrock 04B, 800 CFM Q-Jet: 73/41/AX rods on a G Hangar.
Modified secondary pulloff. Built by Dean Oliver.

Last edited by dc2x4drvr; Sep 20, 2010 at 07:36 AM.
Old Oct 16, 2011 | 08:28 AM
  #7  
4speedBench's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 127
I'm in the midst of this myself. My 455 is a stock '71 motor & 4speed. QJ was re-done by Sparky but it has a stumble at partial/light throttle but if you put your foot into it..WOW. I'm thinking I need to go richer in primary metering rods since I noticed it runs best (and smooth) at cold start up (rich via choke) and WOT.

Suggestions on rods?

Thanks
Old Oct 16, 2011 | 08:47 AM
  #8  
firefrost gold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,444
From: mn
Dave I have cliffs book and a old mag from 70 or 71 were they NHRA set up a q jet for a 442 if you want I can dig them out and drop them off let me know.
Old Oct 16, 2011 | 02:56 PM
  #9  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
I ran a bone stock 72 455 carb with a stock fuel pump. Car went 13.16, no problems.
secondary rods were AU.
It was only a 9:1 compression setup though.
Old Oct 17, 2011 | 09:03 AM
  #10  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,030
Try to find Doug Roe's book on Rochesters. He ranks the size of secondary rods. Beyond that, for a given altitude and camshaft, the best approach is to test different stuff. For street, I got good results with DA secondary rods; primary jets depended in part on what metering rods I could find.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hullinger
Big Blocks
8
Apr 20, 2014 01:39 PM
KDV
Small Blocks
2
Aug 13, 2013 06:50 PM
Prsabordo
Parts Wanted
15
Jan 27, 2011 04:33 PM
cfair
Big Blocks
1
Jul 22, 2009 12:10 AM
mpothuizen
Small Blocks
2
Dec 3, 2006 01:40 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:40 PM.