th200 4r /425 compatibility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old September 1st, 2009, 09:01 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
geckonz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 537
th200 4r /425 compatibility

I was talking to a chap from Oregon asking him about the required trans / torque converter upgrades for the 425 over the existing 307 in my 86 brougham d`elegance .Below ,verbatum , is his reply


"you will need to check to see if you can mount that 425 to the 2004r also i am not sure the pilot on a 2004r converter will go into a 425
you will need to do some research to make sure it will work"


Can someone please explain ? I can`t see why the 425 and th200 4r would be incompatible
cheers
mike
geckonz08 is offline  
Old September 1st, 2009, 10:52 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
Should bolt right up. It won't last long unless you throw some money at it first though.
svnt442 is offline  
Old September 1st, 2009, 11:02 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
geckonz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 537
svnt442 ,

tx buddy n yes I guess the reason for contacting the trans guy was to beef it up a bit
cheers mike
geckonz08 is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2009, 06:35 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
bccan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,500
Make sure you have the metric bolts for TQ converter & check to make sure there are flywheel holes in the right place to accept the TQ. I have this distant thought there might not be a correct set of holes. Then again I might be hallucinating. Make sure that trans is either in good shape & from a performance model - preferrably a GN or alternatively a 442, Monte SS, etc. Even those units will be on borrowed time w/ a 425, but the lesser units will be toast in short order if you use your right foot much. At least put a shift kit and a HD second gear servo to give yourself a chance.
bccan is online now  
Old September 2nd, 2009, 08:47 AM
  #5  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,268
Originally Posted by svnt442
Should bolt right up. It won't last long unless you throw some money at it first though.
The correct response is WILL bolt right up...

Note that the 425 (and all 64-67 motors) have a different crank flange bolt pattern than the 68-90 motors. You will need the correct flexplate for the 425.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old September 2nd, 2009, 12:26 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
geckonz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 537
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The correct response is WILL bolt right up...

Note that the 425 (and all 64-67 motors) have a different crank flange bolt pattern than the 68-90 motors. You will need the correct flexplate for the 425.


Joe, tx yes thats the answer and fortunately I do have the flex plate that came with the 425

BTW
The trans will ofcourse be getting a complete upgrade to handle the torque . Even my blissful ignorance has this one covered.
mike
geckonz08 is offline  
Old September 3rd, 2009, 10:50 AM
  #7  
is Fast Enough ...
 
mugzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: dogtown
Posts: 1,308
What about a 4160e ...

With the electronic shift could you hook up paddle shifters ..?
mugzilla is offline  
Old September 3rd, 2009, 01:26 PM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,268
Originally Posted by mugzilla
What about a 4160e ...

With the electronic shift could you hook up paddle shifters ..?
The 4L60E has the same problems as the 700R4 on which it is based - no BOP bellhousing and not strong enough in stock form to survive behind a BBO.

Personally I don't see the attraction of paddle shifters anyway. Give me a dual gate, or better, a manual trans, but of course that's just my preference.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old September 3rd, 2009, 02:53 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
hotrodpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 303
I sure agree on the paddle shifter. Not worht the hype. I like the ratchet shifters for Auto trans. Used a B&M Quicksilver for years and years. Beat it to death and wore it out, called B&M and they happily sent me a rebuild kit for FREE and took me about 20 minutes to put in the new parts, and never wore it out after that and ended up selling that ride with the shifter included.
hotrodpc is offline  
Old September 3rd, 2009, 06:58 PM
  #10  
is Fast Enough ...
 
mugzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: dogtown
Posts: 1,308
I thought the ease of mounting would be nice and a clean hump with no shifter or console would be very declasse ...
mugzilla is offline  
Old September 3rd, 2009, 07:41 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
hotrodpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 303
Originally Posted by mugzilla
I thought the ease of mounting would be nice and a clean hump with no shifter or console would be very declasse ...
So you are trying to bring back the old push button automatic Dodge idea, using paddles instead. Might be a nice idea to at least try.
hotrodpc is offline  
Old September 3rd, 2009, 09:00 PM
  #12  
is Fast Enough ...
 
mugzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: dogtown
Posts: 1,308
Originally Posted by hotrodpc
So you are trying to bring back the old push button automatic Dodge idea, using paddles instead. Might be a nice idea to at least try.
months after I sold my Polara I would paw at the dash trying to shift ...

mugzilla is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
STLCRZY
Transmission
11
July 31st, 2010 07:52 AM
cruisin442
Transmission
0
April 1st, 2007 09:08 AM



Quick Reply: th200 4r /425 compatibility



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:47 AM.