Flip stock pistons around. Piston offset.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 12th, 2019, 02:44 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Stock 455 re-ring. Flip stock pistons around. Piston offset.


I have a stock high compression 455 that I want to re-ring. Is it advisable to turn the pistons around to use the built-in pin offset to make more power?

Last edited by VinMichael; August 12th, 2019 at 04:31 PM.
VinMichael is offline  
Old August 12th, 2019, 03:43 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,920
Are you sure they’re offset, can you see it?
cutlassefi is offline  
Old August 12th, 2019, 04:21 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
I am not sure yet. The block is still together.

I thought thats how they all came from the factory...
VinMichael is offline  
Old August 12th, 2019, 05:51 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: The Seasonally-Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 660
How much do you want to listen to the knocking that is reduced by offsetting the pin?

The whole reason to offset the pin is to cut down the piston slap. You turn it backwards, the knocking is even worse. Especially on a worn cylinder bore. But what do I know? Maybe you have a really loud radio.

There there's the issue of having to press the pistons off the rods. Be lucky if you don't score a piston pin, or break a piston in the process. OR you could take the piston and rod and move it to another hole so the piston offset ends up bass-ackwards, but you have to make sure the bearing offset stays correct.

Far as I'm concerned, it's nothing but heartache.

Last edited by Schurkey; August 12th, 2019 at 06:01 PM.
Schurkey is offline  
Old August 12th, 2019, 06:48 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Originally Posted by Schurkey
How much do you want to listen to the knocking that is reduced by offsetting the pin?

The whole reason to offset the pin is to cut down the piston slap. You turn it backwards, the knocking is even worse. Especially on a worn cylinder bore. But what do I know? Maybe you have a really loud radio.

There there's the issue of having to press the pistons off the rods. Be lucky if you don't score a piston pin, or break a piston in the process. OR you could take the piston and rod and move it to another hole so the piston offset ends up bass-ackwards, but you have to make sure the bearing offset stays correct.

Far as I'm concerned, it's nothing but heartache.
have you ever done it?

My rods that are in my 455 now are “backwards.” The pistons are not
VinMichael is offline  
Old August 12th, 2019, 11:46 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: The Seasonally-Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by VinMichael
have you ever done it?
Hell, no.

Originally Posted by VinMichael
My rods that are in my 455 now are “backwards.” The pistons are not
How are the crank fillets not riding on the bearing edges? I'm gonna have to dig out the 425 rods from the barn and take a look at them. My 455 photos are inconclusive.
Schurkey is offline  
Old August 13th, 2019, 05:09 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,920
Olds cranks are undercut, no radius. They most likely could be flipped.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old August 13th, 2019, 10:27 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
VinMichael's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 558
Originally Posted by Schurkey
Hell, no.
Okay I was just wondering where you got your opinion from

Based on what I've read reversing the pistons when there is an offset makes the rod act longer and makes more power and throttle response.

Last edited by VinMichael; August 13th, 2019 at 10:29 AM.
VinMichael is offline  
Old August 13th, 2019, 11:13 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
66-3X2 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Birmingham,Alabama
Posts: 4,691
We use to do that in Chevy small block stockers to change the rod angle. The idea is to flatten the rod angle which helps.
66-3X2 442 is online now  
Old August 13th, 2019, 02:40 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: The Seasonally-Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 660
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Olds cranks are undercut, no radius. They most likely could be flipped.
That makes things easier. Still have the piston slap to deal with, though.
Schurkey is offline  
Old August 13th, 2019, 04:20 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
BillK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Beautiful Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,436
If you really want to do it all you would have to do is swap the piston and rod assemblies from one side of the engine to the other. You dont need to press them off and back on. Personally I dont think you will gain anything on a stock engine.
BillK is online now  
Old August 14th, 2019, 05:53 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
edzolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Red Oak, Texas
Posts: 2,991
Originally Posted by BillK
If you really want to do it all you would have to do is swap the piston and rod assemblies from one side of the engine to the other.
If your rods have "spit holes" this would not be a good odea.
edzolz is offline  
Old August 14th, 2019, 06:04 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
BillK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Beautiful Southern Maryland
Posts: 1,436
Originally Posted by edzolz
If your rods have "spit holes" this would not be a good odea.
Why not ? When you flip them to the other side the spit holes still go towards the camshaft but the pistons will be backwards. You put the #1 piston in the #2 hole etc.
BillK is online now  
Old August 14th, 2019, 06:34 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,920
Originally Posted by BillK
Why not ? When you flip them to the other side the spit holes still go towards the camshaft but the pistons will be backwards. You put the #1 piston in the #2 hole etc.
All of this is a moot point anyway. IF it amounted to any gain it would be minimal anyway. And the increased piston slap would make it even more of a waste of time.
Vin if you want better performance then replace the pistons with a set of Wisecos in std. They make em.

Last edited by cutlassefi; August 14th, 2019 at 09:19 AM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old August 14th, 2019, 07:36 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,865
I quizzed Mahle some years ago on pin offsets, and they assured me that racers have standardized on zero offset, and do not go for a reverse offset.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old August 14th, 2019, 09:19 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,920
Originally Posted by run to rund
i quizzed mahle some years ago on pin offsets, and they assured me that racers have standardized on zero offset, and do not go for a reverse offset.
x2
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 8th, 2019, 04:51 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
307's dont suck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 2
This is an old thread, but I was wondering about a mild street stroker build for a 307 Olds. If you use the 3.51" offset crankshaft, 6.250" LS Rods and LS pistons that are 3.799" plus .030" we have an engine that displaces 323ci and if we add up the numbers we have 9.33" that is very close to the deck height.


Your thoughts?
307's dont suck is offline  
Old November 8th, 2019, 04:57 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
307's dont suck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 2
I should add that that compression height of the pistons is 1.325"

Here is the calculation

3.510"/2 = 1.75"

1.75 (stroke) + 6.250" rod length + 1.325 compression height = 9.33"

Is the deck height on the 307 the same as a 350?

If so what would the compression be on a motor with 5A heads?
307's dont suck is offline  
Old November 8th, 2019, 06:15 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Schurkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: The Seasonally-Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 660
Are there valve reliefs on those "LS" pistons, and are they in the right place for the Olds valve positions?

Deck height of all Olds small blocks is the same within typical production variations.

Without more info on the pistons, and head gasket thickness, there's no way to calculate compression. Might be worth actually measuring the chambers on the heads, too,
Schurkey is offline  
Old November 8th, 2019, 06:31 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,920
Originally Posted by Schurkey
Are there valve reliefs on those "LS" pistons, and are they in the right place for the Olds valve positions?
Deck height of all Olds small blocks is the same within typical production variations.
Without more info on the pistons, and head gasket thickness, there's no way to calculate compression. Might be worth actually measuring the chambers on the heads, too,
Worrying about valve reliefs on an Olds with less than .650 or so lift is a waste of time. It’s irrelevant.
3.510/2 is 1.755. Just do 3.500 with the 6.250 rod and 1.325 comp distance piston. That’ll give you approx 9.325 in total distance. That should give you right about a zero deck.

Last edited by cutlassefi; November 9th, 2019 at 06:40 AM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Macadoo
Big Blocks
27
August 12th, 2017 03:31 PM
Cpriester123
General Discussion
26
August 17th, 2016 11:43 AM
455cutlass1969
Big Blocks
9
February 24th, 2013 05:14 PM
72hurst
Big Blocks
1
March 1st, 2012 03:35 AM
oldsracer67
Big Blocks
1
December 16th, 2008 01:53 PM



Quick Reply: Flip stock pistons around. Piston offset.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:20 AM.