Carburators choice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 06:29 AM
  #1  
Bassemaa93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 66
From: Mount-Lebanon, Lebanon
Carburators choice

I need a help choosing my carburators. Performance upgraded '75 455 motor.

I have a '75 engine upgraded for street performance.
Aluminum heads.
Comp cam w/hydraulic lifters
Dual quad intake
Msd ignition
New oil pump
New fuel pump
Still waiting for double roller chain and aluminum water pump cover and new water pump.*
I want now to choose my carburators. I need 2 carburators for the dual quad, for street performance and drag racing.
Which carburators do you suggest? And how many cfm each one should be? Manual or electric choke is better?
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 06:49 AM
  #2  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
2x 500CFM Edelbrocks would be plenty. You only need one with a choke though and I don't know of any made like that. Others will chime in.
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 07:21 AM
  #3  
Bassemaa93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 66
From: Mount-Lebanon, Lebanon
Originally Posted by TripDeuces
2x 500CFM Edelbrocks would be plenty. You only need one with a choke though and I don't know of any made like that. Others will chime in.
Holley or Edelbrock are better? So I need one with electric choke and one other with no choke.
Thanks anyway, I was thinking of goingf with 2×700 cfm. But it seems to be very high cfm.

Last edited by Bassemaa93; Sep 26, 2016 at 07:27 AM.
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 07:30 AM
  #4  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
I just assumed you had a manifold with Carter, Edelbrock or a Holley base plate pattern or is it made for two QJets?
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 07:42 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,815
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Bassemaa93
Holley or Edelbrock are better? So I need one with electric choke and one other with no choke.
Thanks anyway, I was thinking of goingf with 2×700 cfm. But it seems to be very high cfm.
The ones that fit your manifold will be best. You didn't specify which dual quad intake you have, but if it's either the E-brock O65 or one of the Offy single plane intakes, Holley carbs won't fit. Those are designed for AFBs (now E-brock), unless you have one of the very rare dual Qjet Offy intakes. If yours is a tunnel ram then you have more options.

In any case, you'll never use 1000 cfm. Run a progressive linkage. I had the O65 intake on a built 455 with two 500 cfm AFBs and progressive linkage in a 1971 Cutlass. The car got upwards of 14 mpg. I strongly recommend the dual plane O65 over the Offy intakes for street use.
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 07:44 AM
  #6  
Bassemaa93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 66
From: Mount-Lebanon, Lebanon
Originally Posted by TripDeuces
I just assumed you had a manifold with Carter, Edelbrock or a Holley base plate pattern or is it made for two QJets?
I have both, 2 manifolds haven't decided with which to go, waiting to decide about the carbs.
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 07:59 AM
  #7  
Bassemaa93's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 66
From: Mount-Lebanon, Lebanon
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The ones that fit your manifold will be best. You didn't specify which dual quad intake you have, but if it's either the E-brock C396 or one of the Offy single plane intakes, Holley carbs won't fit. Those are designed for AFBs (now E-brock), unless you have one of the very rare dual Qjet Offy intakes. If yours is a tunnel ram then you have more options.

In any case, you'll never use 1000 cfm. Run a progressive linkage. I had the C396 intake on a built 455 with two 500 cfm AFBs and progressive linkage in a 1971 Cutlass. The car got upwards of 14 mpg. I strongly recommend the dual plane C396 over the Offy intakes for street use.

Well, I have Offy intakes (one haave spread bores and the other square bores), are they that bad? I have a friend running a fual quad Offy on his 455 buick, and he told me it's working great.
Old Sep 26, 2016 | 09:20 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,815
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Bassemaa93
Well, I have Offy intakes (one haave spread bores and the other square bores), are they that bad? I have a friend running a fual quad Offy on his 455 buick, and he told me it's working great.
"Working great" based on what? His "butt dyno"? The reality is that a well-dialed-in single 4bbl on a correctly selected intake to match your engine, cam, and car will make more HP and turn better times in the quarter. The dual quad is more for looks than performance. I'll personally take a dual plane intake on a street motor. You can get the Offy to run acceptably. Frankly, I'd go with the Qjet intake just for the head-scratching factor at cruise night. That assumes you can dial in two Qjets to work on it, or have access to someone who can.
Old Sep 27, 2016 | 06:26 PM
  #9  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,130
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Another carb option on either intake is a pair of 625 cfm Street Demon carbs. They have a similar shape to the AFB but are much better carb. They are based of the Thermoquad with many improvements in a new 3 barrel castings. Spacers may be necessary to clear the back barrels but I would use them anyways due to those intakes low profile. Good luck.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 12:26 AM
  #10  
Firewalker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 719
Originally Posted by olds 307 and 403
Another carb option on either intake is a pair of 625 cfm Street Demon carbs. They have a similar shape to the AFB but are much better carb. They are based of the Thermoquad with many improvements in a new 3 barrel castings. Spacers may be necessary to clear the back barrels but I would use them anyways due to those intakes low profile. Good luck.
http://www.lowrider.com/how-to-tech/...etors/#content

www.dragracermag.com/twin-street-demons-and-lamar-waldens-new-409-a-devilishly-delicious-duo
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 05:47 AM
  #11  
jpc647's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,452

Wow, that phenolic main body seems pretty interesting!
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 07:13 AM
  #12  
droptopron's Avatar
delete
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,810
From: Long Island, NY
No disrespect but your post reads like you have parts but not a plan. You say aluminum heads but not what type or what was done to them. You say Comp Cam but no mention of the specs. Are you locked in to dual quads because you have the intakes & like the look? More details would be helpful.
Old Sep 28, 2016 | 08:33 AM
  #13  
Firewalker's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 719
Originally Posted by jpc647
Wow, that phenolic main body seems pretty interesting!
Spring loaded secondaries easily adjusted from the side....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rodan
General Questions
13
Sep 29, 2014 05:46 PM
kwz
Parts For Sale
0
Apr 19, 2012 10:24 AM
59-59-59
Parts For Sale
0
Jun 3, 2010 08:43 PM
GLMP1968
Drivetrain/Differentials
2
Sep 5, 2007 02:32 PM
tex70
Cutlass
11
Apr 30, 2007 08:46 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:17 PM.