Camshaft for a 1970 W-30 automatic

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old December 7th, 2014, 06:42 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Boiler_81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE MI
Posts: 332
Camshaft for a 1970 W-30 automatic

I am going to be rebuilding the engine in my 1970 W30 automatic this winter. I rebuilt in in 1982 at which time it was bored .060 and had stock compression pistons put in. The car has the original OW transmission along with the factory higher stall speed convertor. The rear gear is a 3.91 with reproduction Goodyear G70-14 tires. The exhaust system is factory cast iron manifolds and pipes. Induction is the factory aluminum manifold along with the stock W-30 Quadrajet.

I have never cared for the fact the automatic W-30s got the standard 442 camshaft. I would like to put something a little more aggressive in this time.

I have looked at some of the threads here and found Cutlassefi's recommendation of the Erson TQ 50 and TQ40. Has anyone run these cam? If so, what are your thoughts? Are there any other cams I should consider?

Last edited by Boiler_81; December 8th, 2014 at 07:10 AM.
Boiler_81 is offline  
Old December 8th, 2014, 04:02 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
442Harv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tracy Ca
Posts: 1,588
I use and like the Engel 22-25-10. I have that in my 70 W30 4SP, and I like it. It has P brakes added, so it also works with P brakes also.
442Harv is offline  
Old December 8th, 2014, 05:56 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
brddg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 421
I have a stock stick shift w30 cam in my automatic 442. Believe me, you should be happy the automatics got the standard 442 cam. Even through manifolds this cam sounds good! But as a tradeoff you get crap for low end power and crap for power brakes and it will run a little hot. Get a modern grind and enjoy some useable power for the amount of fuel you are using. This cam is coming out of my car after I move to my new place otherwise would be happening now. Good luck.
brddg is offline  
Old December 8th, 2014, 06:45 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Boiler_81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE MI
Posts: 332
I know the stick cam is to much in the auto. The power brakes are not an issue for me as my car does not have them. I would have thought Olds would have used the 308 W31 cam in the automatic W30s. It would have distinguished it from the standard 442s.

I am planning on going with a modern cam. The question is which one.

Originally Posted by brddg
I have a stock stick shift w30 cam in my automatic 442. Believe me, you should be happy the automatics got the standard 442 cam. Even through manifolds this cam sounds good! But as a tradeoff you get crap for low end power and crap for power brakes and it will run a little hot. Get a modern grind and enjoy some useable power for the amount of fuel you are using. This cam is coming out of my car after I move to my new place otherwise would be happening now. Good luck.
Boiler_81 is offline  
Old December 8th, 2014, 06:55 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Boiler_81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE MI
Posts: 332
Thank you for another option to consider

Originally Posted by 442Harv
I use and like the Engel 22-25-10. I have that in my 70 W30 4SP, and I like it. It has P brakes added, so it also works with P brakes also.
Boiler_81 is offline  
Old December 8th, 2014, 08:28 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,520
I forgot which one I used, I'll try to look it up, it was from the old Mondello's a "modern" cut W30 cam - I like it a lot, a little lopey and more pull but still a cruiser
stevengerard is offline  
Old December 9th, 2014, 04:18 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,891
There are lots of options but the new fast ramp stuff doesn't always have the same effect on older style heads as it would on the new/aftermarket ones.
Yes they'll all work fine but some will work better than others.

The Erson TQ series was specifically designed for stock type applications. Easy on the valvetrain but a bit faster than stock while giving excellent midrange torque.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old December 9th, 2014, 06:22 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Boiler_81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE MI
Posts: 332
This sounds interesting, I'm looking for a good bottom and mid range pulling cam with the rest of the car pretty much stock.

Originally Posted by stevengerard
I forgot which one I used, I'll try to look it up, it was from the old Mondello's a "modern" cut W30 cam - I like it a lot, a little lopey and more pull but still a cruiser
Boiler_81 is offline  
Old December 9th, 2014, 06:24 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Boiler_81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE MI
Posts: 332
Which of the Erson TQs would you recommend? I'm looking for good low to mid range power. I little idle rumble is fine.

Originally Posted by cutlassefi
There are lots of options but the new fast ramp stuff doesn't always have the same effect on older style heads as it would on the new/aftermarket ones.
Yes they'll all work fine but some will work better than others.

The Erson TQ series was specifically designed for stock type applications. Easy on the valvetrain but a bit faster than stock while giving excellent midrange torque.
Boiler_81 is offline  
Old December 9th, 2014, 03:07 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
BlackGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,587
Originally Posted by Boiler_81
This sounds interesting, I'm looking for a good bottom and mid range pulling cam with the rest of the car pretty much stock.
No matter whether you go with an old or modern grind, you'll get more bottom end if you go to a quality, higher stall converter (which will also be of smaller diameter). Yes, the W-30s already had a higher stall converter from the factory, but you can do better. Don't be afraid of a high-stall converter; it'll make a performance cam MORE drivable, not less.


If you're not willing to change the converter, that will be a determining factor in the cam you pick.
BlackGold is offline  
Old December 9th, 2014, 04:03 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Boiler_81's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SE MI
Posts: 332
I agree a higher stall convertor would be good. However, I don't think I want to change it. As long as I can get a bit more performance, I will be happy.

As I said before, it just isn't right that Olds put the standard 442 cam in the W-30 automatic cars. There should have been something between the standard 442 cam and the manual transmission W-30 cam.

Originally Posted by BlackGold
No matter whether you go with an old or modern grind, you'll get more bottom end if you go to a quality, higher stall converter (which will also be of smaller diameter). Yes, the W-30s already had a higher stall converter from the factory, but you can do better. Don't be afraid of a high-stall converter; it'll make a performance cam MORE drivable, not less.


If you're not willing to change the converter, that will be a determining factor in the cam you pick.
Boiler_81 is offline  
Old December 9th, 2014, 06:45 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
geardoc66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 142
I have a 69 Hurst with air conditioning. It does not have the original engine and the previous owner put the W30 manual cam in it. The car was undriveable! Hard to start, would not idle in gear, forget turning on the air conditioning. Low end acceleration was very poor. I selected a Comp Cams #42-231-4. It is very close to the factory H/O cam with a little more lift and a little less duration. The cam has a nice idle lope that I could listen to all day, it idles in gear although does require occasional 2 footing with the air conditioning on. Low end power and throttle response is excellent.
geardoc66 is offline  
Old December 9th, 2014, 07:47 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
costpenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Carrolllton Texas
Posts: 2,855
Originally Posted by Boiler_81
I agree a higher stall convertor would be good. However, I don't think I want to change it. As long as I can get a bit more performance, I will be happy.

As I said before, it just isn't right that Olds put the standard 442 cam in the W-30 automatic cars. There should have been something between the standard 442 cam and the manual transmission W-30 cam.
If you are interested in a OEM grind, the 406768 '70 442 M/T cam is a step up from the 400165 W30 A/T camshaft, but avoids the overlap excesses of the W31 & W30 M/T models.
costpenn is offline  
Old December 10th, 2014, 01:48 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
grampy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 77
I know I will get a lot of heat for this. the plane white box 224/234 @50 works great in a 455 that has decent rear end gear. The tq 40 or tq 50 will work also as well with your rear end gear.

Last edited by grampy; December 11th, 2014 at 03:15 AM.
grampy is offline  
Old December 11th, 2014, 01:23 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,520
I used the JM-22-25-10 as I have power brakes.
stevengerard is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
69442murph
Parts For Sale
0
May 27th, 2015 04:12 AM
Ryan McManus
Parts Wanted
5
March 16th, 2015 03:22 AM
classicmuscle442
442
5
April 3rd, 2013 08:29 AM
Pacecar
Transmission
0
November 28th, 2011 09:44 AM
Giddy
Big Blocks
6
July 31st, 2010 04:41 AM



Quick Reply: Camshaft for a 1970 W-30 automatic



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:05 PM.