California C heads?

Old Oct 21, 2011 | 06:16 PM
  #1  
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,025
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Question California C heads?

I have C heads on my '70 455 engine (numbers match VIN). I realize the correct heads should be stamped E.

Take a look at these pictures. IMG_0497.JPG IMG_0498.JPG
  1. I'm trying to confirm these are C heads designed for a California car.
  2. If true, would I be gaining or losing performance by swaping out for E heads?
Also, any knowledge (or link to info) for A.I.R would be appreciated.

Thanks
Old Oct 21, 2011 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
That's what it looks like to me. The A.I.R. system was removed and plugged.
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 04:12 AM
  #3  
507OLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,814
From: Erie,PA
No difference in performance.Maybe Tweed will chime in about those AIR ports.He has info on those.
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 05:36 AM
  #4  
Chesrown 67 OAI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,213
From: Dover, Ohio
Originally Posted by 507OLDS
No difference in performance.Maybe Tweed will chime in about those AIR ports.He has info on those.
Yup Brian -- Here i am!! Those are indeed "Calif smog" heads. Contrary to the suggestion above that they were smogs and had smog stuff removed and plugged --- these heads look like "factory" smog plugs to me! Yes there is a difference -- factory smog plugs were NOT just standard pipe plugs! These heads perform no differently than any non-smog C head. And in comparison the the E heads that would be correct for your motor --- those C's will perform as well, if not better, than the E's. So the only reason for you to change them would be for you to get the correct E heads on your motor. Depending on the casting dates and stampings on those C's - They could have been off a 67 W-30 which makes them a bit more desirable for us W-30 guys. If you give me the casting dates and the stamped numbers off the front of the pass side head, I can advise you about their origin.
Thanks
T.
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 06:03 AM
  #5  
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,025
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Thanks for replies.

Tweed, I'll get those numbers later today. I appreciate the background
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 06:21 AM
  #6  
68442CONVERTCO's Avatar
Aloha, Tony
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 201
From: Centennial, CO.
I have a set at the machine shop as we speak. Mine appear to have been of a 1967 turnpike cruiser.

Here is the thread, that might help you figure out what they were from.

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-v-number.html
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 06:28 AM
  #7  
68442CONVERTCO's Avatar
Aloha, Tony
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 201
From: Centennial, CO.
Here is the big block unit number details from 442.com.

http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/ofblk.htm#BB 1965 - 1976 Big Block Block Unit Numbers

Basically it decodes the V******* number on the back of one head.
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 07:09 AM
  #8  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
For the sake of demystification, and of faithfulness to primary sources, here is the 1967 engine ID chart.

It shows that your V222232 number (V prefix, no suffix, starts at 200,000) is for a 1967 400CID 2bbl motor, which, as you had discovered, is the Turnpike Cruiser motor.



- Eric
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1967 Engine ID Chart.jpg (80.0 KB, 214 views)
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #9  
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,025
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Originally Posted by Chesrown 67 OAI
Yup Brian -- Here i am!! Those are indeed "Calif smog" heads. Contrary to the suggestion above that they were smogs and had smog stuff removed and plugged --- these heads look like "factory" smog plugs to me! Yes there is a difference -- factory smog plugs were NOT just standard pipe plugs! These heads perform no differently than any non-smog C head. And in comparison the the E heads that would be correct for your motor --- those C's will perform as well, if not better, than the E's. So the only reason for you to change them would be for you to get the correct E heads on your motor. Depending on the casting dates and stampings on those C's - They could have been off a 67 W-30 which makes them a bit more desirable for us W-30 guys. If you give me the casting dates and the stamped numbers off the front of the pass side head, I can advise you about their origin.
Thanks
T.
Here are the stampings:
** don't look at the spark plugs! I intend to replace them ASAP **
Old Oct 22, 2011 | 10:21 AM
  #10  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
So your heads are from a 1967 full size car with a 4bbl 10.25:1 (standard compression) 425.

I'm curious what Tweed has to say about those factory AIR plugs.

- Eric
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 05:57 AM
  #11  
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,025
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Originally Posted by MDchanic
So your heads are from a 1967 full size car with a 4bbl 10.25:1 (standard compression) 425.

I'm curious what Tweed has to say about those factory AIR plugs.

- Eric
Thanks. What does the 425 indicate?
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 06:06 AM
  #12  
bigD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 280
From: bowman, north dakota
that is the displacement of the engine they were on
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 06:15 AM
  #13  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by stlbluesbrother
What does the 425 indicate?
To rephrase, they came from a 425 cubic inch motor with a 4bbl carburetor and a 10.25:1 compression ratio that was installed in a 1967 full size car (a Delta 88 or a 98, or maybe a Delmont if it was special ordered).

- Eric
Old Oct 23, 2011 | 09:23 AM
  #14  
stlbluesbrother's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,025
From: St. Louis, Missouri
Well, I didn't have a diamond in the rough. The engine with these heads still screams, though.

The latest info begets the same question posed earlier (#2): Should these heads (from a full sized '67 car) flow similary as stock E heads?
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 08:52 AM
  #15  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,841
From: Northern VA
As noted, the threads for the A.I.R. ports are not NPT, they are straight threads with an inverted flare seal, just like brake and fuel lines. Dorman products sells the correct plugs, as does Mondello, so I wouldn't necessarily claim that these are "factory" plugs, as the factory cars without A.I.R. simply didn't have the heads drilled.
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 09:02 AM
  #16  
Chesrown 67 OAI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,213
From: Dover, Ohio
Originally Posted by stlbluesbrother
Here are the stampings:
** don't look at the spark plugs! I intend to replace them ASAP **
The R code more than likelu puts them from a 425, but could be from a Toro 400? In either case they are not from a 442 but still are probably as good as the "correct" E heads for your motor!
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 09:11 AM
  #17  
Chesrown 67 OAI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,213
From: Dover, Ohio
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
As noted, the threads for the A.I.R. ports are not NPT, they are straight threads with an inverted flare seal, just like brake and fuel lines. Dorman products sells the correct plugs, as does Mondello, so I wouldn't necessarily claim that these are "factory" plugs, as the factory cars without A.I.R. simply didn't have the heads drilled.
Joe -- Only cars with shipping destination to Calif got the AIR equip. They did use the drilled heads on other destination cars with the holes plugged.
All of the 67 W30 cars got the drilled heads but only Calif bound cars got the AIR equip.
Anyway , its my opinion that the C heads in question here are as good or maybe better, performance wise, as the correct E heads for his motor. So unless he is insistent on having the correct E heads on his motor there would be not other reason or need to change them. MOO!
T.
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 09:13 AM
  #18  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by stlbluesbrother
Should these heads (from a full sized '67 car) flow similary as stock E heads?
The generally group-sourced estimate (ie: the conventional wisdom) says that C heads flow marginally better than E heads, but no Olds heads flow well by modern standards.
Both types should have the same 1.625" exhaust valves and 2.000" intake valves for non-442 and non-Toro applications, or 2.072" intakes for 442 and Toro.

You should see no advantage if you switched to E heads.

- Eric
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 11:03 AM
  #19  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
What can you use to plug the smog ports?

The A.I.R. tubes on my Delta are actually in good shape, but not hooked up into the cat, and once I get the classic plates (emissions exempt) the AIR tubes are going bye byes

I have the 7A 0142 casting 1985 smog heads
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 11:55 AM
  #20  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Chesrown 67 OAI
The R code more than likelu puts them from a 425, but could be from a Toro 400?
No.

If they were from a Toro, the number would be R 112777 T.

... and the Toro was a 425 .

- Eric
Old Oct 24, 2011 | 03:09 PM
  #21  
Chesrown 67 OAI's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,213
From: Dover, Ohio
Originally Posted by MDchanic
No.

If they were from a Toro, the number would be R 112777 T.

... and the Toro was a 425 .

- Eric
Ok - wasnt sure about that ---
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Taz
Cars For Sale
11
Jun 18, 2008 03:26 AM
nomoolds4me
Cars For Sale
7
Nov 9, 2007 06:44 AM
1964OldsGuy
Cars For Sale
6
Nov 8, 2007 08:06 AM
tiparosa
Cars For Sale
3
Mar 4, 2007 07:26 PM
dynamic88
Eighty-Eight
0
Nov 2, 2006 08:32 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:14 PM.