3.91 to 3.23 gear switch opinions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 08:35 AM
  #1  
ben442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 400
From: Ontario
3.91 to 3.23 gear switch opinions

I love the low gears in my 442, but after a two hour highway drive this past week I'm seriously considering going to a more highway friendly gear. There must be a few of you who have made the switch and I welcome your thoughts. Oh yea, M-20 4 speed in the car and a fresh 455.
Ben
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 10:07 AM
  #2  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by ben442
I love the low gears in my 442, but after a two hour highway drive this past week I'm seriously considering going to a more highway friendly gear. There must be a few of you who have made the switch and I welcome your thoughts. Oh yea, M-20 4 speed in the car and a fresh 455.
Ben
What axle do you have, Type O or Chevy 12 bolt? If it's a Type O, 3.23 gears may not be easy to find. Keep in mind that you'll need to change the carrier to a 3-series; 3.23 gears won't physically fit on a 4-series. You might want to consider 3.42s, which WILL fit on a 4-series carrier. The difference from 3.23 to 3.42 is negligible as far as highway RPMs are concerned.
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 10:12 AM
  #3  
ben442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 400
From: Ontario
Type O rear end with 28 spline axles.
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 10:24 AM
  #4  
ben442's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 400
From: Ontario
Perhaps I should expand on my thoughts,
Option 1- move to a lower numerical gear.
Option 2- perhaps a gear vendor overdrive set-up.
Option 3-drop in a 5 speed trans.
My objective isn't really to modify my car so much as it is to make it more of an all around fun car for all situations, Bad *** off the line and a nice comfy cruiser. I would think I could have my cake and eat it too.

Last edited by ben442; Jul 28, 2019 at 10:27 AM.
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 10:33 AM
  #5  
66-3X2 442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,192
From: Birmingham,Alabama
Originally Posted by ben442
My objective isn't really to modify my car so much as it is to make it more of an all around fun car for all situations, Bad *** off the line and a nice comfy cruiser. I would think I could have my cake and eat it too.
Many have tried and many have failed.
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 10:36 AM
  #6  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,892
From: Brazil Indiana
X2 on the 3.42 gears. I would for sure go with the 3.42 for all around
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 11:50 AM
  #7  
VC455's Avatar
Barely Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,628
From: Gillespie County, Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by ben442
(I'd like to).. make it...Bad *** off the line and a nice comfy cruiser.
If you put in a lower numerical gear, you reduce off-the-line performance. A 3.42 will be like a 0.88 overdrive ratio.

If you put in 5-speed, a 6-speed, or a Gear Vendor overdrive, you will keep low-speed performance and the comfy cruiser vibe.

A 5-speed will give you a 0.64 overdrive and about 600 ft lb torque limit. You'll need to find one that has the same shifter position so you can use the factory console. You will need to cut a new hole in the tunnel for the shifter that comes off the top of the trans instead of the side. You'll need to adapt to the factory clutch linkage or install a hydraulic clutch, shorten the driveshaft, and reposition the trans crossmember.

A 6-speed will give a 0.50 overdrive and about 800 ft lb torque capacity. The unit is so big that you will need major tunnel surgery. The comments for the 5-speed also apply.

A Gear Vendors will give you a 0.78 overdrive ratio, has much more torque capacity than any Olds can muster, and is the cheapest of the three overdrive choices. You'll need to beat on the tunnel to add clearance where it pinches down behind the trans but a hard rubber mallet will usually work. The driveshaft needs to be shortened by 14 inches and change.

Overall, I think the GV is a much simpler solution and can be installed much more easily. Additionally, used units are often available if you want to save money.
Old Jul 28, 2019 | 05:52 PM
  #8  
truckman5000's Avatar
W30
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 529
From: Cape Cod Ma
Keep the 3.90
Unless you want to swap..lol
The 3.42 isnt worth the reduction, uld still want a overdrive unit like gear vendors
Old Jul 30, 2019 | 07:16 AM
  #9  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,796
From: Evansville, IN
Overdrive units are...interesting. Back when they used to be a thing, separately, from the factory, you could engage them whenever you wanted. So, instead of 1,2,3,4 you could have 2,3,4,5 effectively with 4 gears. This would allow you Cruise Mode, and ***** Out Mode. I would think it would be interesting to do.
Old Jul 30, 2019 | 11:08 AM
  #10  
MI68442W30's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 231
an even better option with no modifications would be to add an overdrive gear in place of fourth gear in your 4 speed trans as they are available in more than one overdrive ratio.
Old Jul 30, 2019 | 11:59 AM
  #11  
11971four4two's Avatar
MOTORHEAD
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,957
From: minnesota USA
Gear Vendors overdrive for muncie

Not mine but thought I would pass it along

https://minneapolis.craigslist.org/d...939336291.html

Or you could change carrier and gears to 3.08 or 3.23
Old Jul 30, 2019 | 05:49 PM
  #12  
Mr Shifty Sidney's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,399
From: South Central, KY
You can always build another rear with your choice of gear. Maybe a 71/72 corporate rear will give you more options and probably at a lower price.

Don W
Old Dec 16, 2019 | 09:24 PM
  #13  
JLawrence's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
What axle do you have, Type O or Chevy 12 bolt? If it's a Type O, 3.23 gears may not be easy to find. Keep in mind that you'll need to change the carrier to a 3-series; 3.23 gears won't physically fit on a 4-series. You might want to consider 3.42s, which WILL fit on a 4-series carrier. The difference from 3.23 to 3.42 is negligible as far as highway RPMs are concerned.
olds 3.42 are like 3.41 if I recall but 3.23 are not 3.23 they call them that they are 3.15s or something like that. I just made that swap but no drive time yet
Old Dec 17, 2019 | 12:13 AM
  #14  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
Originally Posted by JLawrence
olds 3.42 are like 3.41 if I recall but 3.23 are not 3.23 they call them that they are 3.15s or something like that. I just made that swap but no drive time yet
Not really sure where you got this information, but it's incorrect. Take a good look down the left side for the gear ratios and the tooth count on the ring and pinion. A 3.23 is a 3.23.

Old Dec 17, 2019 | 09:03 AM
  #15  
JLawrence's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by svnt442
Not really sure where you got this information, but it's incorrect. Take a good look down the left side for the gear ratios and the tooth count on the ring and pinion. A 3.23 is a 3.23.
from doing the math with the gear count
But not sure how I screwed it up i used my phone as a calculator

Last edited by JLawrence; Dec 17, 2019 at 09:13 AM.
Old Dec 17, 2019 | 09:13 AM
  #16  
JLawrence's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by JLawrence
from doing the math with the gear count
But not sure how I screwed it up i used my phone as a calculator
I'm going to have to pull the cover and do it again at only sucks because I just put new fluid in it
Old Dec 17, 2019 | 09:15 AM
  #17  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by JLawrence
from doing the math with the gear count
But not sure how I screwed it up i used my phone as a calculator
The Type O 3.23 gears have a 42 tooth ring gear and a 13 tooth pinion. 42/13 = 3.230769
Old Dec 17, 2019 | 09:18 AM
  #18  
JLawrence's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by JLawrence
from doing the math with the gear count
But not sure how I screwed it up i used my phone as a calculator
but from what I still have chicken scratched down is 41 and 13
Old Dec 17, 2019 | 09:36 AM
  #19  
VC455's Avatar
Barely Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,628
From: Gillespie County, Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by JLawrence
...doing the math with the gear count
Dividing gear counts and comparing to nominal ratios, two gears differ by -1 in the third significant figure:
  • 2.78 is actually 2.79
  • 4.66 is actually 4.67
The others are spot on.
Old Dec 17, 2019 | 09:45 AM
  #20  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by JLawrence
but from what I still have chicken scratched down is 41 and 13
From the parts book:



Old Dec 17, 2019 | 09:51 AM
  #21  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by VC455
Dividing gear counts and comparing to nominal ratios, two gears differ by -1 in the third significant figure:
  • 2.78 is actually 2.79
  • 4.66 is actually 4.67
The others are spot on.
39/14 = 2.78571, so yeah, someone didn't round off properly.
42/9 = 4.666666666

Heck, even the IRS lets you round to the nearest dollar.
Old Dec 17, 2019 | 11:00 AM
  #22  
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 321
From: Pittsburgh, PA
The 2.78 was originally designed with a 38.5 tooth ring gear, but they wore out too fast.
The 39 tooth ran much quieter & lasted longer.....

Old Dec 17, 2019 | 01:28 PM
  #23  
BackInTheGame's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,471
From: Colorado - Front Range
Originally Posted by Lonnies Performance
The 2.78 was originally designed with a 38.5 tooth ring gear, but they wore out too fast.
The 39 tooth ran much quieter & lasted longer.....
Now that is funny!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sammicurr86
General Discussion
18
Jan 5, 2017 02:43 PM
Kiwi69Cutlass
Drivetrain/Differentials
8
Jul 31, 2016 03:36 PM
jaygtx440
Drivetrain/Differentials
6
Jan 10, 2015 02:33 PM
66-3X2 442
General Discussion
13
Oct 15, 2014 07:43 PM
michael hilsabeck
General Discussion
7
Jan 8, 2011 11:38 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:31 PM.