trim rings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April 14th, 2013, 07:20 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
trim rings

Hi looking for good quality 14 by 6 1968 trim rings. These have the brushed appearance. Ty Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 08:09 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,243
Hey Dean I have three (3) rings that are 14", brushed finish. Please take a look & see if these are what you need. Thanks, Brett
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
General B U 2-10-2013 200.jpg (90.2 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg
General B U 2-10-2013 199.jpg (74.6 KB, 34 views)
Paladin31 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 09:01 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Hi Brett ty for responding, did these come off a 68 if so they are probably them. If so how much are you looking to get? Also what remains of a Ram Rod do you have ? Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 09:08 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Brett the ones I have on the car have open valve stem area do these? ty Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 09:08 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,243
I'm not sure of the year. I can measure the depth tomorrow evening. I only have the short block left. Well have a few small items but nothing of consequence. I only had a bulk parts car. Saved the motor and a few things. The 69 was a different story for another time. Will post info tomorr
Paladin31 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 09:11 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Wow you can still do something w it. Are you retaining the block, are you interested in selling if you don't use? ty Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 09:12 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,243
I'm not sure of the year. I can measure the depth tomorrow evening. I only have the short block left. Well have a few small items but nothing of consequence. I only had a bulk parts car. Saved the motor and a few things. The 69 was a different story for another time. Will post info tomorrow. Brett
Paladin31 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 09:13 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,243
Wow that was surreal. No I am keeping the block have Special project for it
Paladin31 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 09:52 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
oh good you should let me know if you need anything have TO 68 rear as well as a whole entire body. It was originally a W-30 but of course motor/tranny gone
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 14th, 2013, 10:00 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,243
Really. Hmmmm. Will have to sleep on that Later
Paladin31 is offline  
Old April 15th, 2013, 06:37 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,243
I did a little research, my rings are an early 14x7 more brushed finished than bright, not 14x6, too deep. IMHO you need a 14x6 with about a 2" to 2-1/4" depth. sorry to get your hopes up, but I wish you all the best. Later
Paladin31 is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 05:44 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
WTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beachwood, NJ
Posts: 1,461
Dean Im told they are still available from GM. Pricey though. A friend of mine got a set about a year ago and they were the 68 style.
WTony is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 05:58 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Tony thanks for the lead will follow up on it - Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 06:26 AM
  #14  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Originally Posted by Paladin31
I did a little research, my rings are an early 14x7 more brushed finished than bright, not 14x6, too deep. IMHO you need a 14x6 with about a 2" to 2-1/4" depth. sorry to get your hopes up, but I wish you all the best. Later
Correct! One indicator (not proof) of '68 rings is that the valve stem hole is not closed, it is open to the inside. Because it is much shallower. Another indicator is a step in the outer ring.
The only difference between the '68 and '69 (the only early years with 14" x 6") is the '68 brushed finish. My understanding is that there are very close repops out there that have the shiny '69 finish. But OEM '68s are getting really scarce. I rarely see them even on cars at Olds meets.
wmachine is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 06:55 AM
  #15  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Originally Posted by WTony
Dean Im told they are still available from GM. Pricey though. A friend of mine got a set about a year ago and they were the 68 style.
Originally Posted by dnmfranco
Tony thanks for the lead will follow up on it - Dean
Dean, please let us know what you find out. I find that hard to believe. It may be that *something* is available, but not correct '68s. Lots of guys don't understand that what GM determines as correct replacement part are *not* always like the originals.
That said, the '79 edition of the parts catalog still shows the '68 ring is available, but not the '69.
FYI, '68 part number is 1383607.
wmachine is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 07:14 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
WTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beachwood, NJ
Posts: 1,461
Originally Posted by wmachine
Correct! One indicator (not proof) of '68 rings is that the valve stem hole is not closed, it is open to the inside. Because it is much shallower. Another indicator is a step in the outer ring.
The only difference between the '68 and '69 (the only early years with 14" x 6") is the '68 brushed finish. My understanding is that there are very close repops out there that have the shiny '69 finish. But OEM '68s are getting really scarce. I rarely see them even on cars at Olds meets.
I have not seen a repop out there that is even close to the same lip as the 68-69 SS2. The closest I've seen was a Mustang trim ring, but it was visibly different. I searched for years before I found a set from a GTO guy at Carlisle. The 69 GTO 14x6 use the same trim ring as the 69 SS2. The Firebird is different.
WTony is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 07:51 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
First off thank you all for the help and knowledge. Went online under gm restoration parts. There you have to submit your query by email only. Then they get back to you far as availability in your models year. So I am hoping that is the correct resource, and yes Tony have not seen these anywhere !!!!! Tough year on 68s with some of this stuff. So please if any other suggestions please continue you guys have been great thus far
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 08:49 AM
  #18  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Originally Posted by WTony
I have not seen a repop out there that is even close to the same lip as the 68-69 SS2.
Here are the repops I'm referring to. Supposed to be GM application.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
'68.'69 repop trim ring.jpg (39.2 KB, 28 views)
File Type: jpg
'68.'69 repop trim ring2.jpg (33.5 KB, 21 views)
File Type: jpg
'68.'69 repop trim ring3.JPG (55.1 KB, 17 views)
wmachine is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 11:31 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Paladin31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Battle Creek, Michigan
Posts: 2,243
Kurt those are interessting, to me anyway, for a completely different reason. Take note of the small flange on the inner/lower circumference of those + the grips are four (4) evenly spaced pieces that resemble gear teeth w/sping jaws. I had heard that there were 2 main suppliers of rings in the 68-70 timeframe and these were the 'earlier supplier' style. The 'latter supplier' used the stainless grip rings that circled the outer edge of the major diameter. Im wondering now if the two supplier story was correct....any thoughts?
Paladin31 is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 11:33 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
What is the height on these when lying on a flat surface? and the diameter roughly? I may have some used?
scrappie is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 01:13 PM
  #21  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Originally Posted by Paladin31
Kurt those are interessting, to me anyway, for a completely different reason. Take note of the small flange on the inner/lower circumference of those + the grips are four (4) evenly spaced pieces that resemble gear teeth w/sping jaws. I had heard that there were 2 main suppliers of rings in the 68-70 timeframe and these were the 'earlier supplier' style. The 'latter supplier' used the stainless grip rings that circled the outer edge of the major diameter. Im wondering now if the two supplier story was correct....any thoughts?
I do recall there was something about different grips, but I don't know (or remember at least) anything about the details. I'm not too versed in trim rings.
Do I have any thoughts about these grips shown? No, as reproductions they could have anything from correct grips to bubblegum to hold them on. I can, however, compare them to some old ones I have if it would help.
wmachine is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 02:18 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
WTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beachwood, NJ
Posts: 1,461
Originally Posted by wmachine
Here are the repops I'm referring to. Supposed to be GM application.
Kurt I've seen that style before too.
Here's pics of the ford and correct 69 gm rings to see the difference. I have a close up pic of the lip somewhere on my computer. I'll post after I find them.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
trimring1.jpg (61.4 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg
trimring2.jpg (74.9 KB, 20 views)
WTony is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 02:33 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
WTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beachwood, NJ
Posts: 1,461
Ahh! I found them!
You can see in the close up how the lip has a raised line and the inside edge is almost cupped before it turns down.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
my phone 9-27-12 066.jpg (56.2 KB, 22 views)
File Type: jpg
my phone 9-27-12 065.jpg (39.2 KB, 24 views)
WTony is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 02:41 PM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Got a reply back gm resto parts nothing oh well. Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 03:15 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
hurst68olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,580
Here are a few pics of what I believe to be an original '68 SSII trim ring.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
68 SSII 14x6 - 1.jpg (34.0 KB, 23 views)
File Type: jpg
68 SSII 14x6 - 2.jpg (27.0 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg
68 SSII 14x6 - 3.jpg (40.7 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg
68 SSII 14x6 - 4.jpg (39.7 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg
68 SSII 14x6 - 5.jpg (34.0 KB, 15 views)
hurst68olds is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 03:33 PM
  #26  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
That is it dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 03:49 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
hurst68olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 1,580
here are some "summer of '68" wheel/ring pics
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
summer 68 SSII - 1.jpg (52.5 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg
summer 68 SSII - 2.jpg (56.4 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg
summer 68 SSII - 3.jpg (23.9 KB, 10 views)
File Type: jpg
summer 68 SSII - 4.jpg (18.0 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg
summer 68 SSII - 5.jpg (22.3 KB, 9 views)
hurst68olds is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 03:59 PM
  #28  
Rodney
 
cdrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,336
trim rings

Dean:
I have a few trim rings with the 4 clips spaced evenly around the ring. I've never really looked too closely at the lip as these were part of a bulk parts buy and not something I was looking for at the time; could be what you need. I will stop by my shop tomorrow and snap a pic or 2 for you.
Rodney
cdrod is online now  
Old April 16th, 2013, 05:15 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
What about these: They are in decent shape. There is only one that has some light curb scratches on it. I've had them probably 15 yrs.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_4185.JPG (110.9 KB, 13 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_4186.JPG (107.3 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_4187.JPG (94.7 KB, 9 views)
scrappie is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 05:39 PM
  #30  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Originally Posted by WTony
Ahh! I found them!
You can see in the close up how the lip has a raised line and the inside edge is almost cupped before it turns down.
Originally Posted by hurst68olds
Here are a few pics of what I believe to be an original '68 SSII trim ring.
Tony, what Dan posted is what I understand to be correct for '68 too. Right down to the brushed finish. The outer ring is not brushed, has two steps with the inner step being higher. The brushed finish is heavily enough brushed that it is virtually non-reflective. The rings you posted a really different than that.
I can't say I'm 100% on this, but this has been my understanding for some time now, but that, of course, doesn't make it right.
If what Dan posted is correct, you can see how the repop ones I posted are virtually the same except for finish.
This will be interesting to get to the bottom of this.
BTW, the rings were changed to polished in '69 because there were too many complaints that the wheels as a whole looked too dull.
wmachine is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 08:08 PM
  #31  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
rings

Originally Posted by cdrod
Dean:
I have a few trim rings with the 4 clips spaced evenly around the ring. I've never really looked too closely at the lip as these were part of a bulk parts buy and not something I was looking for at the time; could be what you need. I will stop by my shop tomorrow and snap a pic or 2 for you.
Rodney
great please do and ty - Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 16th, 2013, 08:10 PM
  #32  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
rings

Originally Posted by scrappie
What about these: They are in decent shape. There is only one that has some light curb scratches on it. I've had them probably 15 yrs.
Thanks for pics are they the brushed surface, I couldn't exactly tell from pics Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 17th, 2013, 05:03 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
scrappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: eastern MA
Posts: 3,287
Finish is hard to tell what it is. I was thinking they could use a good buffing to get them to shine but maybe that is the way they are supposed to be? I'll try to get some pix but I really can't be positive what the finish is? Do the brushed ones have no shine at all?
scrappie is offline  
Old April 17th, 2013, 06:54 AM
  #34  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
dnmfranco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NEW HARTFORD CT
Posts: 2,632
Okay if you look at 68Hurstolds post, there he has a correct pic of one. Hoping that might help you far telling if it is. The brushed ones definitely do not get that gloss shine to them - hope this helps Dean
dnmfranco is offline  
Old April 17th, 2013, 07:02 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
WTony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Beachwood, NJ
Posts: 1,461
Originally Posted by wmachine
Tony, what Dan posted is what I understand to be correct for '68 too. Right down to the brushed finish. The outer ring is not brushed, has two steps with the inner step being higher. The brushed finish is heavily enough brushed that it is virtually non-reflective. The rings you posted a really different than that.
I can't say I'm 100% on this, but this has been my understanding for some time now, but that, of course, doesn't make it right.
If what Dan posted is correct, you can see how the repop ones I posted are virtually the same except for finish.
This will be interesting to get to the bottom of this.
BTW, the rings were changed to polished in '69 because there were too many complaints that the wheels as a whole looked too dull.
Kurt, I took that pic at Glenn Johnson's place when we were up in Mass. for the 09 nationals. I think thats when you and I finally met?
He also had 4 of the original 69, NOS in the old style box, trim rings that are the same as what I posted. I will have to look for the photo's but I think I took a pic of the part # of the NOS box? He's the guy I go to for 69 info, thats how I found out what was supposed to be on these wheels. I had thought that the brushed style, which I've seen on a couple cars, did have the same lip as the 69? But again, I could be wrong about that?
In any case, the pic I posted is definitely the 69 style and has been confirmed by Tim Murphy as well. He was with us at Glenns that same day.
WTony is offline  
Old April 17th, 2013, 09:11 AM
  #36  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Bill just posted these '69 rings for sale with some good pics.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...tml#post535520

They look just like the ones from my earlier posts, and what Dan posted for '68s. Again, '68s and '69s being the same except for the brushed section on the '68s.
wmachine is offline  
Old April 18th, 2013, 07:11 AM
  #37  
Rodney
 
cdrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,336
trim rings

Dean:
I checked my rings but they seem to have a different profile than what you're looking for, and the valve stem notch is different too - see attached pics.

Anybody know what year these are? I have never seen rings like these before with only 4 clips on the back. I've always owned 71 or 72 models; could these be for a 70 model? Thx!

Rodney
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
DSC08996.jpg (152.9 KB, 12 views)
File Type: jpg
DSC08997.jpg (148.7 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg
DSC09001.jpg (140.0 KB, 8 views)
cdrod is online now  
Old April 18th, 2013, 07:21 AM
  #38  
Trying to remember member
 
wmachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,112
Originally Posted by cdrod
Dean:
I checked my rings but they seem to have a different profile than what you're looking for, and the valve stem notch is different too - see attached pics.

Anybody know what year these are? I have never seen rings like these before with only 4 clips on the back. I've always owned 71 or 72 models; could these be for a 70 model? Thx!

Rodney
A closed valve stem hole tell you without further looking that it is not correct for '68-'69. First thing to look for is the open ended hole.
wmachine is offline  
Old April 18th, 2013, 09:24 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 5,266
I've never seen these in person but I've been told the Pontiac trim rings are the same.

Page 295, part number T110F

http://www.amesperf.com/catalogs/G29.pdf
allyolds68 is offline  
Old April 18th, 2013, 05:30 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
driverchoice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 186
[QUOTE][I've never seen these in person but I've been told the Pontiac trim rings are the same/QUOTE] NO THERE NOT I THOUGHT THE SAME THING BUT THE PONTIAC RINGS (RALLEY 1 ) HAVE A SHALLOWER VALVE STEM NOTCH THE OLDS ARE HIGHER LIKE A CHEVY RING
driverchoice is offline  


Quick Reply: trim rings



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:53 PM.