trim rings
#5
I'm not sure of the year. I can measure the depth tomorrow evening. I only have the short block left. Well have a few small items but nothing of consequence. I only had a bulk parts car. Saved the motor and a few things. The 69 was a different story for another time. Will post info tomorr
#7
I'm not sure of the year. I can measure the depth tomorrow evening. I only have the short block left. Well have a few small items but nothing of consequence. I only had a bulk parts car. Saved the motor and a few things. The 69 was a different story for another time. Will post info tomorrow. Brett
#11
I did a little research, my rings are an early 14x7 more brushed finished than bright, not 14x6, too deep. IMHO you need a 14x6 with about a 2" to 2-1/4" depth. sorry to get your hopes up, but I wish you all the best. Later
#14
The only difference between the '68 and '69 (the only early years with 14" x 6") is the '68 brushed finish. My understanding is that there are very close repops out there that have the shiny '69 finish. But OEM '68s are getting really scarce. I rarely see them even on cars at Olds meets.
#15
That said, the '79 edition of the parts catalog still shows the '68 ring is available, but not the '69.
FYI, '68 part number is 1383607.
#16
Correct! One indicator (not proof) of '68 rings is that the valve stem hole is not closed, it is open to the inside. Because it is much shallower. Another indicator is a step in the outer ring.
The only difference between the '68 and '69 (the only early years with 14" x 6") is the '68 brushed finish. My understanding is that there are very close repops out there that have the shiny '69 finish. But OEM '68s are getting really scarce. I rarely see them even on cars at Olds meets.
The only difference between the '68 and '69 (the only early years with 14" x 6") is the '68 brushed finish. My understanding is that there are very close repops out there that have the shiny '69 finish. But OEM '68s are getting really scarce. I rarely see them even on cars at Olds meets.
#17
First off thank you all for the help and knowledge. Went online under gm restoration parts. There you have to submit your query by email only. Then they get back to you far as availability in your models year. So I am hoping that is the correct resource, and yes Tony have not seen these anywhere !!!!! Tough year on 68s with some of this stuff. So please if any other suggestions please continue you guys have been great thus far
#19
Kurt those are interessting, to me anyway, for a completely different reason. Take note of the small flange on the inner/lower circumference of those + the grips are four (4) evenly spaced pieces that resemble gear teeth w/sping jaws. I had heard that there were 2 main suppliers of rings in the 68-70 timeframe and these were the 'earlier supplier' style. The 'latter supplier' used the stainless grip rings that circled the outer edge of the major diameter. Im wondering now if the two supplier story was correct....any thoughts?
#21
Kurt those are interessting, to me anyway, for a completely different reason. Take note of the small flange on the inner/lower circumference of those + the grips are four (4) evenly spaced pieces that resemble gear teeth w/sping jaws. I had heard that there were 2 main suppliers of rings in the 68-70 timeframe and these were the 'earlier supplier' style. The 'latter supplier' used the stainless grip rings that circled the outer edge of the major diameter. Im wondering now if the two supplier story was correct....any thoughts?
Do I have any thoughts about these grips shown? No, as reproductions they could have anything from correct grips to bubblegum to hold them on. I can, however, compare them to some old ones I have if it would help.
#22
#28
trim rings
Dean:
I have a few trim rings with the 4 clips spaced evenly around the ring. I've never really looked too closely at the lip as these were part of a bulk parts buy and not something I was looking for at the time; could be what you need. I will stop by my shop tomorrow and snap a pic or 2 for you.
Rodney
I have a few trim rings with the 4 clips spaced evenly around the ring. I've never really looked too closely at the lip as these were part of a bulk parts buy and not something I was looking for at the time; could be what you need. I will stop by my shop tomorrow and snap a pic or 2 for you.
Rodney
#30
I can't say I'm 100% on this, but this has been my understanding for some time now, but that, of course, doesn't make it right.
If what Dan posted is correct, you can see how the repop ones I posted are virtually the same except for finish.
This will be interesting to get to the bottom of this.
BTW, the rings were changed to polished in '69 because there were too many complaints that the wheels as a whole looked too dull.
#31
rings
Dean:
I have a few trim rings with the 4 clips spaced evenly around the ring. I've never really looked too closely at the lip as these were part of a bulk parts buy and not something I was looking for at the time; could be what you need. I will stop by my shop tomorrow and snap a pic or 2 for you.
Rodney
I have a few trim rings with the 4 clips spaced evenly around the ring. I've never really looked too closely at the lip as these were part of a bulk parts buy and not something I was looking for at the time; could be what you need. I will stop by my shop tomorrow and snap a pic or 2 for you.
Rodney
#32
#33
Finish is hard to tell what it is. I was thinking they could use a good buffing to get them to shine but maybe that is the way they are supposed to be? I'll try to get some pix but I really can't be positive what the finish is? Do the brushed ones have no shine at all?
#34
Okay if you look at 68Hurstolds post, there he has a correct pic of one. Hoping that might help you far telling if it is. The brushed ones definitely do not get that gloss shine to them - hope this helps Dean
#35
Tony, what Dan posted is what I understand to be correct for '68 too. Right down to the brushed finish. The outer ring is not brushed, has two steps with the inner step being higher. The brushed finish is heavily enough brushed that it is virtually non-reflective. The rings you posted a really different than that.
I can't say I'm 100% on this, but this has been my understanding for some time now, but that, of course, doesn't make it right.
If what Dan posted is correct, you can see how the repop ones I posted are virtually the same except for finish.
This will be interesting to get to the bottom of this.
BTW, the rings were changed to polished in '69 because there were too many complaints that the wheels as a whole looked too dull.
I can't say I'm 100% on this, but this has been my understanding for some time now, but that, of course, doesn't make it right.
If what Dan posted is correct, you can see how the repop ones I posted are virtually the same except for finish.
This will be interesting to get to the bottom of this.
BTW, the rings were changed to polished in '69 because there were too many complaints that the wheels as a whole looked too dull.
He also had 4 of the original 69, NOS in the old style box, trim rings that are the same as what I posted. I will have to look for the photo's but I think I took a pic of the part # of the NOS box? He's the guy I go to for 69 info, thats how I found out what was supposed to be on these wheels. I had thought that the brushed style, which I've seen on a couple cars, did have the same lip as the 69? But again, I could be wrong about that?
In any case, the pic I posted is definitely the 69 style and has been confirmed by Tim Murphy as well. He was with us at Glenns that same day.
#36
Bill just posted these '69 rings for sale with some good pics.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...tml#post535520
They look just like the ones from my earlier posts, and what Dan posted for '68s. Again, '68s and '69s being the same except for the brushed section on the '68s.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...tml#post535520
They look just like the ones from my earlier posts, and what Dan posted for '68s. Again, '68s and '69s being the same except for the brushed section on the '68s.
#37
trim rings
Dean:
I checked my rings but they seem to have a different profile than what you're looking for, and the valve stem notch is different too - see attached pics.
Anybody know what year these are? I have never seen rings like these before with only 4 clips on the back. I've always owned 71 or 72 models; could these be for a 70 model? Thx!
Rodney
I checked my rings but they seem to have a different profile than what you're looking for, and the valve stem notch is different too - see attached pics.
Anybody know what year these are? I have never seen rings like these before with only 4 clips on the back. I've always owned 71 or 72 models; could these be for a 70 model? Thx!
Rodney
#38
Dean:
I checked my rings but they seem to have a different profile than what you're looking for, and the valve stem notch is different too - see attached pics.
Anybody know what year these are? I have never seen rings like these before with only 4 clips on the back. I've always owned 71 or 72 models; could these be for a 70 model? Thx!
Rodney
I checked my rings but they seem to have a different profile than what you're looking for, and the valve stem notch is different too - see attached pics.
Anybody know what year these are? I have never seen rings like these before with only 4 clips on the back. I've always owned 71 or 72 models; could these be for a 70 model? Thx!
Rodney
#39
I've never seen these in person but I've been told the Pontiac trim rings are the same.
Page 295, part number T110F
http://www.amesperf.com/catalogs/G29.pdf
Page 295, part number T110F
http://www.amesperf.com/catalogs/G29.pdf
#40
[QUOTE][I've never seen these in person but I've been told the Pontiac trim rings are the same/QUOTE] NO THERE NOT I THOUGHT THE SAME THING BUT THE PONTIAC RINGS (RALLEY 1 ) HAVE A SHALLOWER VALVE STEM NOTCH THE OLDS ARE HIGHER LIKE A CHEVY RING