Thermostat housing
#1
Thermostat housing
Is there any difference between thermostat housings from small block to big blocks on 65-70. Mine needs to be replaced due to corrosion. Would prefer original than after market. Thank you.
#2
Same housing on all later gen (64 and later?) Olds v8's.
The only difference is the bypass tube. Some have a short straight tube - which then requires the formed rubber hose with the curve. Most housings have a bent metal tube so you only need a short section of heater hose to connect to the water pump.
Note that the Dorman and Chrome aftermarket parts are questionable at best and many folks have trouble getting them to seal. Post a parts wanted ad and folks will throw these things at you for a few bucks.
The only difference is the bypass tube. Some have a short straight tube - which then requires the formed rubber hose with the curve. Most housings have a bent metal tube so you only need a short section of heater hose to connect to the water pump.
Note that the Dorman and Chrome aftermarket parts are questionable at best and many folks have trouble getting them to seal. Post a parts wanted ad and folks will throw these things at you for a few bucks.
#6
According to the April 1969 parts manual a 65-400 w/air uses part number 392099, w/o air is part number 386129... This early style housing was available in both cast steel and aluminum, but I don't know what year the change was made or if it was relative to air versus non-air... In any case 65 & 66 housings should be the same...
#8
Cruzn 66 Is there a chance you have the part numbers for the a/c and the non a/c thermostat housings mixed up? The part number on my a/c thermostat housing is 386129. I believe the housing I have is original to my motor.
#9
My 1974 book agrees with CRUZN. However my Nov. 67 book reads 386129 1965-67/all V-8 W/400 Engine...392099 1965-67/ All V-8 EXC 442 PKG.
Last edited by Yellowstatue; April 7th, 2017 at 06:01 PM. Reason: Addendum
#13
Last edited by CRUZN 66; April 8th, 2017 at 03:21 PM.
#14
the angle of incline is a bit different -- thats all. either one will work fine on a non-tri-carb engine.
Some have a big 1 and some have a big 2 cast in the side. Either will workfine on your 65 car. The ones with the curved tube coming out of them are from later years - not sure which year they started but i know it was after 67? JoeP??
Some have a big 1 and some have a big 2 cast in the side. Either will workfine on your 65 car. The ones with the curved tube coming out of them are from later years - not sure which year they started but i know it was after 67? JoeP??
Last edited by Chesrown 67 OAI; April 8th, 2017 at 03:06 PM.
#15
More confusion?
Just to add a bit more chaos to the confusion, here's what the 1966 Olds parts book (effective April 1966) has for group 1.153, Outlet, engine water, for the 8 cylinder engines:
1966-F85 V8, J88 exc. 442............................................... ....392099*
1966-F85 442, D88, Delta, S/F, 98 exc. C.A.C., Spec. Cool.......386129*
1966-F85 442, D88, Delta, S/F, 98 C.A.C., Spec. or H.D. Cool...392099*
1966 Tor. exc. C.A.C............................................. 382543*
1966 Tor. C.A.C............................................. .................393286
*The first four of the listing indicate that they were used on previous years also.
1966-F85 V8, J88 exc. 442............................................... ....392099*
1966-F85 442, D88, Delta, S/F, 98 exc. C.A.C., Spec. Cool.......386129*
1966-F85 442, D88, Delta, S/F, 98 C.A.C., Spec. or H.D. Cool...392099*
1966 Tor. exc. C.A.C............................................. 382543*
1966 Tor. C.A.C............................................. .................393286
*The first four of the listing indicate that they were used on previous years also.
Last edited by Ozzie; April 9th, 2017 at 12:09 AM.
#16
I would like to know why two styles too? I have two motors I pulled from 1970 Lansing built cars. A 70 delta 88 455 iron thermo housing. A 70 455 toronado aluminum housing? 30 years later I wish I had both back. Both were rusted beyond belief. The toronado at 65k was so bad the rear suspension failed...
#18
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post