rear gear suggestion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 14th, 2012, 08:09 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Charles Ludwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 230
rear gear suggestion

ok so engine tranny done ..

68 cutlass ... was 2 speed trans now 2004r

need suggestions on gears and where to get them ??

has stock 12 bolt whatever came on cutlass supreme 2 speed
Charles Ludwick is offline  
Old March 14th, 2012, 08:14 PM
  #2  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
I think you can do 3.73 maybe even higher with a o.d. transmission and be fine. you get there fast but when the overdrive kicks in it just cruise and keep the rpms down
coppercutlass is offline  
Old March 14th, 2012, 09:00 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
1969w3155's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Muskegon, Mi.
Posts: 8,637
You need to identify your rear first. Then I would contact Richmond Gear, or Supercarsunlimited.
1969w3155 is offline  
Old March 14th, 2012, 09:23 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Charles Ludwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 230
How do i identify .. i know its a 12 bolt cover .. non posi..

did they make different on the 2 speed cars ??
Charles Ludwick is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 08:16 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
If your car was built in Canada,then it came with a 12-bolt Chevy rear.If it was not built in Canada,then it has a 12-bolt O-axle.
If it is a 12-bolt Chevy,I would put 3:73's in it.
If it is a 12-bolt O-axle,I would put 3:90's in it.
Remember,you have overdrive,so you can go with those steeper gears,and still cruise around,and fly down the highway.You can get gears for the 12-bolt Chevy from a variety of companies,but you can only get new gears for the O-axle from Richmond,and the onlt two ratios that Richmond makes for the O-axle is 3:42 & 3:90.
507OLDS is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 01:52 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
72CUTTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Compton, Ca
Posts: 130
Hey Charles hows that 200r4 working for you? i just had 3.73 installed with yukon posi, now im trying to get a 200r4. BTW 3.73's and posi are great!!!!
72CUTTY is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 02:00 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Charles Ludwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 230
well i havent gotten to drive it much ... I drove it for 20 minutes yesterday ..

im thinking a 700r4 might be easier ... does hit good though get a nice chirp from 1st to 2nd ... probably alot better when gears are done
Charles Ludwick is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 02:39 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
The 200R4 seems to be the overdrive trans of choice.They can be finnicky to tune the way you want it,but they are nice once they're set.
507OLDS is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 02:48 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Charles Ludwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 230
what will changing the gears do .. will i notice the difference ???
Charles Ludwick is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 02:59 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
A substantial gear ratio change,like we have mentioned,will show a noticeable difference.It will feel like you added more power to the engine.You will definitely feel it.If you went from a 3:08 to a 3:23,I would say no,but you are jumping from a 2:56 to a 3:73 or 3:90.You will notice that.
507OLDS is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 03:11 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
MaxDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Fabulous Las Vegas
Posts: 194
Originally Posted by 507OLDS
A substantial gear ratio change,like we have mentioned,will show a noticeable difference.It will feel like you added more power to the engine.You will definitely feel it.If you went from a 3:08 to a 3:23,I would say no,but you are jumping from a 2:56 to a 3:73 or 3:90.You will notice that.
What if you go from a 2.73 to a 3.42? Noticeable? Big difference?
MaxDog is offline  
Old March 15th, 2012, 03:24 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
72CUTTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Compton, Ca
Posts: 130
I went to this transmission shop and the guy there recommended a 700r4. I just don't like the fact that i have to cut my driveshaft. I have also talk to a couple chebby guys and they don't seem to like the 700r4 a lot. I'm definitely going with the 200r4. Also i went from stock peg leg gears to posi 3.73 and yes! u can definitely feel the difference!
72CUTTY is offline  
Old March 16th, 2012, 04:37 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
Depending on the exact length of the existing driveshaft,some people have gotten away with not cutting the driveshaft,but some have.A recent swap consisted of swapping the TH350,for a 200R4,and the existing driveshaft fit,but it was tight to the point where it wanted to bind,so it was shortened.
Yes,going from a 2:73 to a 3:42 would be noticeable as well.
507OLDS is offline  
Old March 16th, 2012, 06:34 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Charles Ludwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 230
so then i should have the 27 spline ???


can you guide me in the most economical way to get to 3:90 .....
Charles Ludwick is offline  
Old March 16th, 2012, 09:14 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
507OLDS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie,PA
Posts: 3,814
If you have the 12-bolt O-axle,then it will have the 27-spline pinion,and 28-spline axles.You will have about $800.00-$900.00 in parts,before labor.That would include the posi unit,gears,all the bearings & seals to do the entire axle,and an installation kit.The gears alone are over $300.00.
507OLDS is offline  
Old March 16th, 2012, 03:45 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Charles Ludwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 230
Now i was driving , and heard a bang and now the car dont move at all ..

Was told it is the torque converter ??? it was shifting fine ... i have only driven my car maybe 10 miles off the rebuild .. im very dissappointed ...
Charles Ludwick is offline  
Old March 16th, 2012, 03:58 PM
  #17  
car guy
 
gearheads78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 5,660
You will not like the 700r4 with 3.73 and really not like it with the 3.90's First rear is just too steep. Stick with the 2004r
gearheads78 is offline  
Old March 18th, 2012, 07:11 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
bccan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,432
Going from a high 2 gear to a mid/high 3 ratio will make a HUGE difference. That said, you have a pressing issue to deal with after getting "banged"

1) What is the origin of this 200 trans? Junkyard, core, used but "good", rebuilt, "new"? Origin of converter?

2) If rebuilt or "new", does it have an upgraded input shaft? Is the servo on right side of unit still properly retained by ring?

3) Have you checked the simple/stupid items - TV adjustment, linkage, fluid, etc? TC bolts still fastened?

4) Is there a builder responsible for the unit? Can car or trans be brought back to them for diagnosis?

If no fluid hemorrhage, it won't be servo. I don't know how likely TC is to fail, input shafts are notorious for failure, leaving you no fwd or rev gears.

Last edited by bccan; March 18th, 2012 at 07:34 AM.
bccan is offline  
Old March 18th, 2012, 06:42 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Charles Ludwick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 230
Originally Posted by bccan
Going from a high 2 gear to a mid/high 3 ratio will make a HUGE difference. That said, you have a pressing issue to deal with after getting "banged"

1) What is the origin of this 200 trans? Junkyard, core, used but "good", rebuilt, "new"? Origin of converter?

2) If rebuilt or "new", does it have an upgraded input shaft? Is the servo on right side of unit still properly retained by ring?

3) Have you checked the simple/stupid items - TV adjustment, linkage, fluid, etc? TC bolts still fastened?

4) Is there a builder responsible for the unit? Can car or trans be brought back to them for diagnosis?

If no fluid hemorrhage, it won't be servo. I don't know how likely TC is to fail, input shafts are notorious for failure, leaving you no fwd or rev gears.

Thanks Bcan .. on another thread i discussed my problems with the original builder ... now on to another one problems again ... anybody know any builders here in san diego ???
Charles Ludwick is offline  
Old March 20th, 2012, 01:00 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
jag1886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Boise ID
Posts: 1,275
I installed a 3:90 gear and a 200R4 in my 65, I like it a lot, great acceleration from a light and still gets good mileage.
jag1886 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jensenracing77
Site Suggestions
44
April 12th, 2013 01:26 PM
4-ever-olds
Interior/Upholstery
11
October 12th, 2009 03:58 AM
ben1212
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
7
April 24th, 2008 09:18 PM



Quick Reply: rear gear suggestion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 PM.