Is it ok to run without a thermostat?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 08:32 PM
  #1  
The Stickman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 743
From: Lehigh Valley Pa
Is it ok to run without a thermostat?

I was putting new intake gaskets on to see if I could cure my massive vacuum leak. I got it all buttoned up when I saw the thermostat laying out. I just forgot to put it in. I would hate to have to drain the system again. SO can I run without it?
Old Apr 24, 2009 | 08:37 PM
  #2  
redoldsman's Avatar
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,796
From: Rowlett, TX
You might be able to but it is not advisable. It would depend on how hot is gets where you live. There was a time when we used to take our thermostats out in the summer. The thermostat actually slows the flow of coolant down going through the radiator so it has time to let the radiator do it's job. Otherwise it will move through the radiator too fast and will actually run hotter.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 01:25 AM
  #3  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by The Stickman
........ can I run without it?
You can, if you want your engine to run cooler than it was designed to run.

Thermostat has one function: To maintain normal operating temperatures by restricting coolant flow.

Originally Posted by redoldsman
........ Otherwise it will move through the radiator too fast and will actually run hotter.
Another myth.

The theory is: Water flows through the radiator so fast that its heat cannot be transfered. If so, why doesn't it flow through the engine so fast that it cannot absorb any heat?

Norm
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 04:31 AM
  #4  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,804
From: Brazil Indiana
i have seen both of the above happen in differant situations. i have seen people take the water pump and grind vanes off to slow down the water. you should run with the thermostat to avoid either one from happening. more ofter than not you will run colder without a thermostat.
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 04:42 AM
  #5  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Yeah I would just suck it up and drain SOME coolant and reinstall the thermo
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 07:46 AM
  #6  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by jensenracing77
........ grind vanes off to slow down the water ........
Excellent way to create cavitation, which would cause overheating.

Norm
Old Apr 25, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #7  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,804
From: Brazil Indiana
i know that i would not do this but i seen it done. ( the water pump thing) i like to keep things more like they were ment to be.
Old Apr 26, 2009 | 09:54 PM
  #8  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by jensenracing77
i know that i would not do this but i seen it done .........
I have seen a lot of stupid things done, during my short lifetime. Need I say any more?

Norm
Old May 3, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #9  
SIPLOWGUY's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 19
From: Staten Island, New York
It's best for the engine to always run at operating temperature. You need the thermostat to insure that.
Old May 3, 2009 | 09:43 PM
  #10  
Texascarnut's Avatar
Geezer
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 360
From: So. Central Texas
Running an engine without a thermostat is basically a very bad idea. It may actually lead to the engine overheating as the presence of the thermostat allows the radiator to do what it is suppose to do, reduce the temperature of the coolant. Without a thermostat coolant is circulating through the radiator at a flow rate too great to maintain the coolant temperature at less than 190 degrees. An engine without thermostat or a thermostat that is hung open will get hot enough in summer months to basically boil all the coolant right out, and in pretty short order.

Last edited by Texascarnut; May 3, 2009 at 09:50 PM.
Old May 4, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #11  
380 Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,130
From: Iowa
I run a restrictor with a 3/4" hole in my drag car. It stays cooler than no thermostat. This is a proven fact.
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #12  
Warhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,012
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by Texascarnut
Running an engine without a thermostat is basically a very bad idea. It may actually lead to the engine overheating as the presence of the thermostat allows the radiator to do what it is suppose to do, reduce the temperature of the coolant. Without a thermostat coolant is circulating through the radiator at a flow rate too great to maintain the coolant temperature at less than 190 degrees. An engine without thermostat or a thermostat that is hung open will get hot enough in summer months to basically boil all the coolant right out, and in pretty short order.
And do not use a "HP" unit. If it opens far enough, it gets jammed open.
Just as bad.
POS.
Jim
Old May 5, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #13  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,804
From: Brazil Indiana
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
I have seen a lot of stupid things done, during my short lifetime. Need I say any more?

Norm
Jo Mondello is the one that recommended it to someone in a seminar that i attended
Old May 5, 2009 | 08:40 PM
  #14  
Hydro462's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18
From: Pittsburgh, Pa
The motor will not run as efficent as it will when hot..

I like the Stewart t-stats..
***Beware, Mr.Gasket sells a look alike but it is a POS***

http://www.stewartcomponents.com/tec...ech_Tips_3.htm
Old May 5, 2009 | 10:07 PM
  #15  
70Post's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,604
From: Austin, Texas
That's funny--they are the same thermostats and made by the same company.
Old May 6, 2009 | 06:14 AM
  #16  
Hydro462's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18
From: Pittsburgh, Pa
I e-mailed Stuart Components with this post.. I'll post the response......
Old May 6, 2009 | 10:50 AM
  #17  
70Post's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,604
From: Austin, Texas
These thermostats are manufactured by RobertShaw Industries.
Old May 6, 2009 | 12:23 PM
  #18  
Hydro462's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18
From: Pittsburgh, Pa
The difference between our thermostat and the Mr. Gasket unit is that we
use a Robertshaw Thermostat from Cooper Standard.

The Robertshaw Thermostat is made for the racing application, it is made
with a larger mouth and is less restrictive when open. When open the
flow is more balanced.

The Mr. Gasket unit is a little better than the OEM unit but it is not
as good as the Robertshaw.
Old May 6, 2009 | 12:29 PM
  #19  
Hydro462's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18
From: Pittsburgh, Pa
I know of about 15 failures of the Mr Gasket unit. People think they are getting the same thing at the Stuart only cheaper.... That was the same mistake I made.. Once I installed the Stewart unit all my t-stat troubles went away....

The Mr gasket unit I had worked on the first use then my temperatures began to creep up higher and higher with every use. By the fifth run my motor was over heating and the t-stat wouldn't open...

Seems like everything I buy with the Mr Gasket label ends up in the garbage can... I don't think it's the same company that was run by Hungarian Joe in Cleveland...

Last edited by Hydro462; May 6, 2009 at 12:34 PM.
Old May 6, 2009 | 08:34 PM
  #20  
70Post's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,604
From: Austin, Texas
Good info Hydro!! Thanks for doing more digging on this. I'll stick with the stats from Stewart then...have a bunch of those and the Mr. Gasket stats will hit the recycle bin.

Thanks again.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 04:45 PM
  #21  
spyke's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 96
So I understand some of this I have a 70 model cutlass and I have been running it without a T stat and my temp runs about 190* but after about 35-45 min. It climbs to about 200* maybe 210* if I'm in rush our traffic. I was told to put a 160* T stat in my car and drill some small holes in it , I had a clutch fan on it and it went bad so I bought a flex fan it didn't do the job now I have an electric fan with double fans and it still gets up to about 200* what should I do?
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 05:10 PM
  #22  
Erinyes's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 333
I'm not sure I would worry about it at all, if it's not actually overheating. Next steps, though, might be flushing the cooling system, checking the radiator for proper flow, and as a last resort a FlowKooler water pump.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 06:47 PM
  #23  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,385
From: Poteau, Ok
Spyke, there are numerous threads on this, 200 degrees in traffic is normal. Put a 180 degree superstat in there.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 07:37 PM
  #24  
edzolz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,009
From: Red Oak, Texas
Originally Posted by spyke
It climbs to about 200* maybe 210* if I'm in rush our traffic.
Unless your temp gets above 230 or you lose all of the liquid, your engine is not running hot. Coolant under pressure will not boil at 212, like coolant that is not under pressure. The boiling point is much higher for an engine with a 15 lb pressure cap.
Old Aug 30, 2013 | 08:20 PM
  #25  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
I'm with 380 Racer on this. Buddies car kept overheating without a t-stat. In a pinch we took the guts out of an old t-stat and just used the center ring with the ~ 1 1/4 inch hole in it. Temp went right down and ran normal after that.
I'm not advocating running a restrictor plate but you should run a t-stat.

I've heard pros and cons about water moving too fast in the system to cool it and I'm still not sure what to believe. But I do know they work better with one or some kind of restriction. There's a reason car manufacturers use them. I'll trust their judgement for now and my own practical experience.

Cutting down the pump vanes would only seem to make the pump less efficient to me. Maybe it will free up horsepower but it's not helping pump flow. That's why they use electric pumps............there is no HP drag and you get the volume you need. The best of both worlds. I suspect Joe Mondello was thinking horsepower and not cooling.
Old Aug 31, 2013 | 04:22 AM
  #26  
ELY442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,188
From: Brooklyn, NY
2x on 380 Racer. I, too, run on a smaller hole restrictor plate on my Post Coupe. They do sell the restrictor plates kits. Summit or Jegs sells them. I always have problems with any kind of thermostats on any kind of name brands. Maybe I bought defects.

I also agree with TripDeuces. I gutted out the thermostat on my Convertible and I never over heated on a NYC traffic. You cant run an engine "without" a thermostat. There's have to be some kind of a restriction to slow the water flow.
Old Aug 31, 2013 | 05:19 AM
  #27  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
As OldCutlass pointed out, there are numerous threads on this subject, some of which I have posted in, so I will not belabor this, but slowing down the flow of coolant does NOT improve cooling, it makes it worse.

Installing a restriction in the outlet from the engine creates a pressure differential, with higher pressure in the engine and heads (as much as 40-50 psi), which keeps the water from microscopically boiling at the hot surfaces of the heads and improves heat transfer.

- Eric
Old Sep 1, 2013 | 05:12 AM
  #28  
rustyroger's Avatar
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,514
From: Margate, England
Originally Posted by MDchanic
As OldCutlass pointed out, there are numerous threads on this subject, some of which I have posted in, so I will not belabor this, but slowing down the flow of coolant does NOT improve cooling, it makes it worse.

Installing a restriction in the outlet from the engine creates a pressure differential, with higher pressure in the engine and heads (as much as 40-50 psi), which keeps the water from microscopically boiling at the hot surfaces of the heads and improves heat transfer.

- Eric
Summed it up nicely Eric!.
Some of the old L head engines from years ago made do with no water pump and thermo-siphon coolant flow. That was ok in the days of loose tolerance machining and frequent breakdowns being the norm. Old pre war cars would often boil over going up long hills, you just pulled over until they cooled down and carried on.
But those cars didn't manage many miles until they were worn out, we have come a long way since then, modern technology has made cars more complex but they are light years ahead of old cars for reliability and lifespan.

Roger.
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 04:37 PM
  #29  
at3reg98's Avatar
New 2 Olds
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 205
From: New York
Lightbulb

I say just put it in and get it over with. I know it's a pain in the *** to get to on the 307 but at least you won't be second guessing the temp for the next few months. If you kink the upper hose properly you won't lose much coolant and if you're patient and careful you can put the new therm in with a gasket without doing anything to the engine either. It'll make a mess but it's possible to do, even if it means jacking the car up to change the level of coolant in the area where it sits (so it doesn't overflow when you drop it in messing up the gasket area).

I had to replace a garbage Stant I had in my previous car after I finished work on it, it was new but the temp would climb to 250 or so and then suddenly drop as it opened. Delco and problem solved. I did it the way above too. Probably best to drain some coolant from the rad but my way did the trick.
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 06:48 PM
  #30  
jag1886's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,275
From: Boise ID
Put the stat back in, you only have to drain a gallon of coolant out should take a 1/2 hour at most to make it right.
You might get away without it in PA but you sure wouldn't in AR or ID.
Just put it back in and forget about it.
Old Sep 5, 2013 | 08:27 PM
  #31  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
It's been a long time since he's been on here. He has a Olds 350 swapped in the wagon. I've seen it personally back in 2007
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shamusj
Big Blocks
15
Mar 4, 2016 06:48 AM
import extermination
Cutlass
3
May 17, 2009 11:07 AM
Flye
Big Blocks
8
May 10, 2009 08:13 AM
oldsdroptop
General Discussion
9
Apr 18, 2009 07:06 PM
ToronadoGuyDenver
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
12
Mar 18, 2007 02:52 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:12 AM.