Original ride height

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2018 | 07:20 PM
  #1  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Original ride height

Hey all, here's something that I've been pondering for awhile. My 72 Cutlass Supreme has been modified with non adjustable coil overs in the rear and it also still has regular rear coils. I was thinking about lowering the rear but would like to go with just regular shocks and coils. It has 275/60/15s on the rear so I don't wanna go too low and have to worry about tire rub. I have about 4 inches of clearance right now but would like to lose about 2 inches if possible.

If I go with a stock shock equivalent would it set too low, or should I go with a slightly stiffer shock just to be on the safe side?

If anyone could post some pics of theirs at original ride height it would be much appreciated!

Dave
Old Aug 5, 2018 | 09:12 AM
  #2  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
Shocks will not make a difference on ride height - it's the coil springs that set the height.

275-60-15s will fit in the rear fender wells of a 72 with ease, assuming you have wheels with the proper backspacing.

So do you want pictures of original ride height or the actual measurements from the CSM?
Old Aug 5, 2018 | 12:05 PM
  #3  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Fun71
Shocks will not make a difference on ride height - it's the coil springs that set the height.

275-60-15s will fit in the rear fender wells of a 72 with ease, assuming you have wheels with the proper backspacing.

So do you want pictures of original ride height or the actual measurements from the CSM?
Thanks for the reply. Not really interested in stock ride height unless I can get a slight "rake" with the bigger tires.

So if the coils set the height then what do I do? I'm pretty sure the rear coils are stock, but I'm guessing the lift is coming from the coil overs, right?
Old Aug 6, 2018 | 07:08 AM
  #4  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Bump.
Old Aug 7, 2018 | 07:36 PM
  #5  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Fun71
Shocks will not make a difference on ride height - it's the coil springs that set the height.

275-60-15s will fit in the rear fender wells of a 72 with ease, assuming you have wheels with the proper backspacing.

So do you want pictures of original ride height or the actual measurements from the CSM?
Hmm...if the ride height is set by the coils then I'm guessing my rear coils arent stock, cuz I'm pretty sure I'm not at stock ride height in the rear.
Old Aug 7, 2018 | 09:12 PM
  #6  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by 72455
I'm guessing the lift is coming from the coil overs, right?
Most likely. So you have both coil springs and coilover shocks? Two sets of coil springs in back? How's the ride quality?

Old Aug 8, 2018 | 03:05 AM
  #7  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Fun71
Most likely. So you have both coil springs and coilover shocks? Two sets of coil springs in back? How's the ride quality?
Eh...could be better, could be worse. Ya gotta remember from my original post that in one of it's former lives it spent some time running the 1/4 mile so traction was the goal. That's why I wanna lower it a bit.
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 02:06 PM
  #8  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
I would get rid of the coil overs and install a new set of rear coil springs to give the ride height you desire.
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 02:38 PM
  #9  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 04:57 PM
  #10  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Fun71
I would get rid of the coil overs and install a new set of rear coil springs to give the ride height you desire.
That's the plan but I still need shocks to replace the coilovers, and what I'm trying to figure is what shocks to get...
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 06:13 PM
  #11  
RetroRanger's Avatar
72 Olds CS
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
I used a 1" spacer under the rear coil spring to adjust my ride height. I put new coils in but w a myriad of options i just picked some HD FE2 like ones and then had to tweak for a slight rake
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 07:44 PM
  #12  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by 72455
That's the plan but I still need shocks to replace the coilovers, and what I'm trying to figure is what shocks to get...
I put a set of Monroe gas charged shocks on mine back, well, a long long time ago. Just get whatever brand/style shock you prefer for a 1972 Cutlass application. The shocks dampen oscillations and do not set the ride height, if you were wondering.
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 08:06 PM
  #13  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Fun71
Shocks will not make a difference on ride height - it's the coil springs that set the height.

275-60-15s will fit in the rear fender wells of a 72 with ease, assuming you have wheels with the proper backspacing.

So do you want pictures of original ride height or the actual measurements from the CSM?
If shocks don't make a difference on ride height then why do cars with air shocks sit up high?
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 08:10 PM
  #14  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Fun71
I put a set of Monroe gas charged shocks on mine back, well, a long long time ago. Just get whatever brand/style shock you prefer for a 1972 Cutlass application. The shocks dampen oscillations and do not set the ride height, if you were wondering.
So again I ask...factory style shocks and coil springs? And are the coil overs are what is giving me the lift in the rear?
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 08:24 PM
  #15  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by RetroRanger
I used a 1" spacer under the rear coil spring to adjust my ride height. I put new coils in but w a myriad of options i just picked some HD FE2 like ones and then had to tweak for a slight rake
So by "tweaking" I'm assuming you mean the 1 inch spacers?
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 08:25 PM
  #16  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
Take the helper shocks off and see if your ride height drops to where you want it. If its where you want it go to the auto parts store an get some regular style gas shocks to go on it. Post a side view picture of your car so we can see how high it is.
Old Aug 8, 2018 | 09:44 PM
  #17  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by 72455
If shocks don't make a difference on ride height then why do cars with air shocks sit up high?
Yes, air shocks will adjust the ride height because adding air effectively increases the length of the non-compressible portion of the shock, but "regular" shocks will not adjust ride height- they will just dampen the oscillations while the height is set by the springs.

Originally Posted by 72455
So again I ask...factory style shocks and coil springs?
Yes. Gas charged shocks may not classify as "factory" as they are decades newer than these cars, but for this discussion they are "factory equivalent". And you can get coil springs in various ride heights and stiffness for the ride quality you desire, from soft and floaty up to firm and sporty.

Originally Posted by 72455
And are the coil overs are what is giving me the lift in the rear?
Yes, that is very likely.

Last edited by Fun71; Aug 14, 2018 at 12:14 PM.
Old Aug 9, 2018 | 01:45 AM
  #18  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Take the helper shocks off and see if your ride height drops to where you want it. If its where you want it go to the auto parts store an get some regular style gas shocks to go on it. Post a side view picture of your car so we can see how high it is.
Lol...that very same idea came to me about a month ago. Guess its time to get the tools out😀
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 07:10 AM
  #19  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Theoretically speaking...

In my endeavor to lower the rear on my 72 Cutlass Supreme (it currently has coil springs and coilovers.) I want to lose about two inches.

I measured the ride height (using the guidelines in the CSM) and right now I'm at about 12-1/2.


If I go back to factory style shocks then I should lose the two inches I need, right ?

I know this is contingent on the rear coil springs being stock but I just wanted to make sure I was on point with my thought process.

Thanks,
Dave
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 08:05 AM
  #20  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
I merged your 2 threads so we know the issues you were having.

What is the ride height with the helper shocks removed? Can you post a side view of your car?
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 08:22 AM
  #21  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
I haven't measured it with the coilovers removed, but I know the regular coil springs are factory equivalent.
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 09:37 AM
  #22  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
You asking questions that we can only speculate. Those are not coil over shocks, they are load compensating and will raise the car some. Remove the bottom shock mount and set the car back on the ground. Bounce the rear a few times and measure.
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 10:01 AM
  #23  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Will do and I'll keep you posted.
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 10:58 AM
  #24  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
So here we go...I swapped out the load carriers for a set of Gabriel Ultra regular shocks then took it for a test drive to let it "settle". I lost about 1-1/2 inches...not quite the 2 inches I estimated, but close enough.

Here's a before and after...




Old Aug 15, 2018 | 11:15 AM
  #25  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Looks way too high in the back. About 3" too high IMO. Shocks aren't going to 'settle'. What you need are new springs.
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 12:34 PM
  #26  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
I agree, are there any spacers under, over, or inside the springs? If not then you need to find a set of springs that will work for the height you want.

Look through the link below and see if you can find the stance you like and pm the owner to see what spring they are using in the rear.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ost-yours.html
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 12:37 PM
  #27  
RetroRanger's Avatar
72 Olds CS
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
Yeah it does seem to sit high in the rear. I cant really see any difference between before and after.

What was your front measurement at the location specd in the manual?

I will check mine (72 supreme) fr and rear and post the springs # if your interested. I put new moogs in mine and had to lift the rear 1" after to get a slight rake.

My rear springs might be the size you need, to bring your car down some...
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 01:10 PM
  #28  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
I agree, are there any spacers under, over, or inside the springs? If not then you need to find a set of springs that will work for the height you want.

Look through the link below and see if you can find the stance you like and pm the owner to see what spring they are using in the rear.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ost-yours.html
Nope...no other springs in the rear other than stock coils.

Last edited by 72455; Aug 15, 2018 at 01:11 PM. Reason: more info
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 01:11 PM
  #29  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Nope..no spacers...
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 01:15 PM
  #30  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
The car does have a slight "tilt" to the left front which I need to investigate. Maybe the driver side will give you a better idea of where I am now. Once I get the "tilt" figured out, I think it will set lower on the right rear and I should be good..this view is where I wanna be...still too high?

Old Aug 15, 2018 | 01:18 PM
  #31  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
….and trust me, it does sit lower. My before measurement at the rear was about 12-1/2 inches, now I'm around 11.

Last edited by 72455; Aug 15, 2018 at 01:30 PM. Reason: more info
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 01:24 PM
  #32  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by RetroRanger
Yeah it does seem to sit high in the rear. I cant really see any difference between before and after.

What was your front measurement at the location specd in the manual?

I will check mine (72 supreme) fr and rear and post the springs # if your interested. I put new moogs in mine and had to lift the rear 1" after to get a slight rake.

My rear springs might be the size you need, to bring your car down some...
Sure, that would be great...thanks.
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 03:41 PM
  #33  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
@11 inches you are under 1 inch over stock. The biggest issue I see is the front is too low and the drivers front is lower than the passenger front which could be causing the passenger rear issue.
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 03:57 PM
  #34  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
I think it would make a big difference if the pictures were taken at 2' off the ground instead of giving a parallax view. I just measured my 72 Cutlass S (running 225/70/14) and there's about 2" over the top tread to the wheel lip. On the back the tread is almost exactly the same height as the wheel lip.
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 04:25 PM
  #35  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
@11 inches you are under 1 inch over stock. The biggest issue I see is the front is too low and the drivers front is lower than the passenger front which could be causing the passenger rear issue.
Yep...I did a crude measurement on the space between the coils on the front...driver side I could only get the tip of my index finger to slip in. Passenger side I made it all the way to the end of my finger nail...thats roughly 1/4 inch difference. The previous owner told me the front coils were good, but based on my findings, what are your thoughts? Is it time for new front coils, or is there something else I can check?
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 04:27 PM
  #36  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Allan R
I think it would make a big difference if the pictures were taken at 2' off the ground instead of giving a parallax view. I just measured my 72 Cutlass S (running 225/70/14) and there's about 2" over the top tread to the wheel lip. On the back the tread is almost exactly the same height as the wheel lip.
By 2 inches off the ground do you mean lie flat on my stomach and take the pic?
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 04:27 PM
  #37  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Most likely its exactly what you thought. Time for new front springs. That 455 is a heavy beast.
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 04:28 PM
  #38  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by 72455
By 2 inches off the ground do you mean lie flat on my stomach and take the pic?
Whuut? 2' is 2 feet. 2" is 2 inches.
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 06:07 PM
  #39  
72455's Avatar
Thread Starter
1972 U code Supreme
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,099
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by Allan R
Whuut? 2' is 2 feet. 2" is 2 inches.
Lol..oops...so the question remains...2 feet off the ground is not that high, so what am I highlighting?
Old Aug 15, 2018 | 07:00 PM
  #40  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Actual angle of the cars rake



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:23 PM.