General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

1961 Bubbletop 409

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 09:50 AM
  #1  
Stefano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,786
From: Land of Lincoln
1961 Bubbletop 409

Forum member goes from W-machine to W-motor machine.

DSCN2659_zps4b97ccfa.jpg
DSCN2658_zpsb50a514c.jpg
DSCN2657_zps2597451f.jpg
DSCN2691_zps73043525.jpg
DSCN2665_zps3f849294.jpg

DSCN2663_zps3394f8f3.jpg

Last edited by Stefano; Aug 12, 2014 at 12:32 PM.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 09:58 AM
  #2  
1968_Post's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 361
From: Tennessee
Stefano,

By chance, do you know the origin of this car?
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 10:09 AM
  #3  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,385
From: Poteau, Ok
Although the 409 was not the engine of my choice growing up, it is unique this day and age especially with a manual trans. I love the lines of a Bubble top.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 10:20 AM
  #4  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
I looked at a 60 years ago with the 348 or w/e the predecessor was up in Terre Haute. Then I got my 442. Same color, yours is in better shape. It ought to fly with that power to weight ratio.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 10:46 AM
  #5  
66trakpak's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 423
From: Long Island NY
Love this car! It's soooo cool.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 11:12 AM
  #6  
bennie442s's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 154
From: Des Moines, IA
61 hardtop

While I am not an expert on Chevrolet, I believe in 1961 it is termed a hardtop. In 1962, there were a few "61 hardtops" left over, and "bubble top" is a term used to describe the special option rare 1962 year model. Of course there is a 62 hardtop as well.
-ben
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 11:45 AM
  #7  
Stefano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,786
From: Land of Lincoln
It's not mine. Wish it was : ) It belongs to Charlie Rogers. It's his new toy.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 12:20 PM
  #8  
TK-65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,210
Originally Posted by bennie442s
While I am not an expert on Chevrolet, I believe in 1961 it is termed a hardtop.


Its a bubble top.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 12:34 PM
  #9  
Stefano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,786
From: Land of Lincoln
Originally Posted by 1968_Post
Stefano,

By chance, do you know the origin of this car?
I know that it just came out of sunny and dry Southern California. I was told it spent its life there?
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 12:38 PM
  #10  
Stefano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,786
From: Land of Lincoln
Originally Posted by bennie442s
While I am not an expert on Chevrolet, I believe in 1961 it is termed a hardtop. In 1962, there were a few "61 hardtops" left over, and "bubble top" is a term used to describe the special option rare 1962 year model. Of course there is a 62 hardtop as well.
-ben
Ben, you are correct, In 1961 this was the only two door hardtop Impala available, in 1962 there was a new simulated convertible top-hardtop and the "Bubble Top" available.

Today both '61s and '62s with this roof line are referred to as "Bubble Tops".
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 12:44 PM
  #11  
rocketraider's Avatar
Oldsdruid
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,600
From: Southside Vajenya
62 Bubble top was only on BelAir. Remains one of the most graceful rooflines GM ever devised and it looked good on all the 1961 B-body cars.

That 61 is gorgeous. I was thinking 409 available only in the mid-year SS? Even if it turns out a 348, still cool with a four-speed.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 12:58 PM
  #12  
tru-blue 442's Avatar
Old School Olds
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,265
From: Marble Falls TX
Cool car.
Reminds me of the 69 SS Impala
I had for about 2 months.

Pulled it out of a wrecking yard for $250.
I was 18. Anyone remember Cherry Ave. Auto Salvage
in Amarillo? Grill was broken out and front
bumper was trashed. Got it running and driving and
was at a 7-11 putting in 10 bucks of gas in it and
a fella offered me $1850 cash. I popped off and said, $2150.
Had to pull up and use the pay-phone and call a bud.

I want to say it had a 348 or a 409 with 3 on the tree.
It would haul *** for the boat it was. I had forgotten
all about that one. Thanks for the memory.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 01:00 PM
  #13  
Stefano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,786
From: Land of Lincoln
Good Points.

Here is my old '62 Belair.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
File Type: jpg
File Type: jpg
File Type: jpg
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 01:03 PM
  #14  
tru-blue 442's Avatar
Old School Olds
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,265
From: Marble Falls TX
^^^ Beautiful!
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 01:10 PM
  #15  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
I absolutely love the 61-62 impalas. In any form lowrider , stock or modified street machine. My favorite though is when they are in class race form from the stocker days. My dad used to have a 64 impala ss with a 409 not sure if it was original but I remember being pinned against the seat as a kid while he ripped through the gears.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 03:25 PM
  #16  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
Low riders and the like make my skin crawl. I just worry about mine being stolen and turned into a hoopty.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 03:29 PM
  #17  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
I have a wide range in taste for cars. despite what anyone say's I still lowriders when done right are very tasteful.



Last edited by coppercutlass; Aug 12, 2014 at 03:33 PM.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 08:42 PM
  #18  
edzolz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,009
From: Red Oak, Texas
In 61 the 409 was only available in the Super Sport option. This car is not a SS. The SS had badging on the side where the flags are. The SS was raised over the top of the flags. There was an SS emblem on the trunk lid in the center where the V emblem is. There was also a "chicken bar" attached to the dashboard on the passenger side, this car does not appear to have this either. I would suspect this one was a dealer install 409 or it is a 348 optioned with the four speed and dual quads added. I'd sure like to see the vin plate.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 08:53 PM
  #19  
stevengerard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,532
From: Chi-town
neighbor had a 62 bubble top - went back when I was older to see if I could buy it, was long gone as was the panel truck in their back yard - dang.
Old Aug 12, 2014 | 10:00 PM
  #20  
cherokeepeople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,517
the easiest way to tell a 348 from a 409 is the dipstick.pass side 348,drivers side 409.so this one would be a 348.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 12:13 AM
  #21  
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 979
From: Grass Valley Ca
Originally Posted by bennie442s
While I am not an expert on Chevrolet, I believe in 1961 it is termed a hardtop. In 1962, there were a few "61 hardtops" left over, and "bubble top" is a term used to describe the special option rare 1962 year model. Of course there is a 62 hardtop as well.
-ben
In 61 there is only one 2dr hardtop and it's referred to as a bubble top.In 62 the 2dr bubbletop was only available in Belair- Biscaine trim as far as i know.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 12:15 AM
  #22  
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 979
From: Grass Valley Ca
Originally Posted by cherokeepeople
the easiest way to tell a 348 from a 409 is the dipstick.pass side 348,drivers side 409.so this one would be a 348.
That's correct 62 was the first 409,also the cylinder heads are different 409 has taller intake ports.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 12:17 AM
  #23  
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 979
From: Grass Valley Ca
Originally Posted by edzolz
In 61 the 409 was only available in the Super Sport option. This car is not a SS. The SS had badging on the side where the flags are. The SS was raised over the top of the flags. There was an SS emblem on the trunk lid in the center where the V emblem is. There was also a "chicken bar" attached to the dashboard on the passenger side, this car does not appear to have this either. I would suspect this one was a dealer install 409 or it is a 348 optioned with the four speed and dual quads added. I'd sure like to see the vin plate.
Not a lot of those built.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 12:20 AM
  #24  
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 979
From: Grass Valley Ca
Originally Posted by tru-blue 442
Cool car.
Reminds me of the 69 SS Impala
I had for about 2 months.

Pulled it out of a wrecking yard for $250.
I was 18. Anyone remember Cherry Ave. Auto Salvage
in Amarillo? Grill was broken out and front
bumper was trashed. Got it running and driving and
was at a 7-11 putting in 10 bucks of gas in it and
a fella offered me $1850 cash. I popped off and said, $2150.
Had to pull up and use the pay-phone and call a bud.

I want to say it had a 348 or a 409 with 3 on the tree.
It would haul *** for the boat it was. I had forgotten
all about that one. Thanks for the memory.
409 was last available in 65 early builds 396 also came out in 65 later builds,69 could be 396 or 427 if big block.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 04:44 AM
  #25  
71rocket's Avatar
car nut farmer
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 595
From: SE KS
A local guy has a '62 BelAire bubble top, 409, 4-speed. I believe it is featured in THIS Hemmings write-up. He's running it less wheel covers, beautiful ride.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 05:08 AM
  #26  
66400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,393
From: Austin, Tx
It's a great looking 61, although was originally an automatic transmission car or at least it has an automatic steering column in it.

The 61 SS Impala package also included spinners on the wheel covers. Same spinners were carried over to the 62 SS Impala.

In 61 the SS package could be order on any full size Impala except the station wagon.

Henry
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 05:22 AM
  #27  
cherokeepeople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,517
i don't know that lug on the column looks alot like a 3 on the tree lug.would be lots easier to do the 3 to 4 spd swap as the pedals would be there.oh well i got him beat i have a 2x4 offyon my toro gt motor.now i just need a body to put it in.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 05:31 AM
  #28  
66400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,393
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by cherokeepeople
i don't know that lug on the column looks alot like a 3 on the tree lug.would be lots easier to do the 3 to 4 spd swap as the pedals would be there.oh well i got him beat i have a 2x4 offyon my toro gt motor.now i just need a body to put it in.

From what I see there is only one ear visible on the lower column which makes me think was automatic. That being said even if it's a conversion it's now more desirable as a 4spd.

Henry
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:41 AM
  #29  
charlierogers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 560
From: illinois
thanks for the response on the bubbletop guys!! for the record the car was originally a 348 3 on the tree sport coupe los angeles built, now its a {numbers checked} 409 with the gm 425hp heads and intake, with a bw early iron mid case super t-10. has stock p case posi 3.70 gear. wanted to clear up a couple facts on the 61 409s. the rpo 580 got you the 409 motor and there were about 265 rpo580 ordered that year. only available in the fullsize chevy {models 12, 14, 16, 1800} 143 0f these came in the ss impala the rest went into the other big cars. production for the 409 started around the 2nd week of jan 61 and available to the public in feb 61 from the Towanda plant. the dipstick for the 409 is on the pass side, the 348 is on the driver side! this is no way to confirm a 409, as the oil pans hold the dipstick and they interchange. just like all are motors check casting numbers to be sure!!!
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:46 AM
  #30  
charlierogers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 560
From: illinois
forgot to add,, thanks to nicky performance {Stefano and crew} for transport the right way. plus having one of the most knowledgeable early impala guys around to set me straight.
Charlie,,
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 11:20 AM
  #31  
tru-blue 442's Avatar
Old School Olds
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,265
From: Marble Falls TX
69 ss

Originally Posted by nsnarsk65cutlass
409 was last available in 65 early builds 396 also came out in 65 later builds,69 could be 396 or 427 if big block.
I understand.
Whatever engine mine had in it why back then
looked just like the one in the original post.
Mine was short four barrels though.
I thought the 348-409-427's had that type V/C.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 08:25 PM
  #32  
cherokeepeople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,517
Originally Posted by charlierogers
the dipstick for the 409 is on the pass side, the 348 is on the driver side!
you mean 409 on drivers side.i doubt very much my 59 spartan has a 409 as my dipstick is on pass side.
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:33 PM
  #33  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
I believe you're correct. Certainly the 409 wasn't restricted to the SS package.

2x4 was not factory, but I've read once they had a kit from the dealer. Not sure if that's true. For 1962, of course, it was one of two 409s available, with three being available for 1963-64, then back to two for 1965 till it was replaced by two 396s. From 1966-68, one 396 was available, then a new 2bbl. 396 was the sole '69.

Originally Posted by 66400
It's a great looking 61, although was originally an automatic transmission car or at least it has an automatic steering column in it.

The 61 SS Impala package also included spinners on the wheel covers. Same spinners were carried over to the 62 SS Impala.

In 61 the SS package could be order on any full size Impala except the station wagon.
Old Aug 14, 2014 | 05:18 AM
  #34  
cherokeepeople's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,517
no there was 2 396's in 66 325 h.p. and 360 h.p.in 67 325 and 350. h.p. was in the cam low lift 325 high lift 350/360.i don't recall if the 350/360 h.p. was an option on the impala/caprice though.

Last edited by cherokeepeople; Aug 14, 2014 at 05:22 AM.
Old Aug 14, 2014 | 07:41 AM
  #35  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
Originally Posted by cherokeepeople
no there was 2 396's in 66 325 h.p. and 360 h.p.in 67 325 and 350. h.p. was in the cam low lift 325 high lift 350/360.i don't recall if the 350/360 h.p. was an option on the impala/caprice though.
I meant "till it was replaced by two 427 in 1966" - sorry.

But there was one 396 in 1966 -325 horsepower. The 350/360-horse motor was Chevelle-only. And don't forget the 375-hp L78 motor too.

But, from 1966-68, the only 396 for the big cars was 325 horsepower till the 1969 2bbl. motor and the 427/335 replaced it.
Old Aug 14, 2014 | 03:26 PM
  #36  
charlierogers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 560
From: illinois
Originally Posted by cherokeepeople
you mean 409 on drivers side.i doubt very much my 59 spartan has a 409 as my dipstick is on pass side.


hey maybe you do have a 409!!! as the dipstick on a 409 from the factory is always on the driver side. ........ or maybe its just a 409 oil pan on your 348. anyways on with more 396 bbc chevy talk, what about that 1965 vette 396/425hp motor.
Old Aug 14, 2014 | 03:47 PM
  #37  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
That was also available in the big cars too. It was replaced by the 427/425 L72.
Old Aug 14, 2014 | 04:01 PM
  #38  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,385
From: Poteau, Ok
Originally Posted by tru-blue 442
I understand.
Whatever engine mine had in it why back then
looked just like the one in the original post.
Mine was short four barrels though.
I thought the 348-409-427's had that type V/C.
Only the 348 and 409 had those V/C's, 396, 427, and 454 had the standard BBC covers.
Old Aug 15, 2014 | 05:33 AM
  #39  
rocketraider's Avatar
Oldsdruid
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,600
From: Southside Vajenya
Weren't the 1963 Z11 427's based off the W-block engine architecture?
Old Aug 15, 2014 | 06:46 AM
  #40  
charlierogers's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 560
From: illinois
Originally Posted by rocketraider
Weren't the 1963 Z11 427's based off the W-block engine architecture?


yes, but they were introduced in a few late 62 cars and continued thru 63. the z11 foundation was based on the production 409 block but increased the stroke from 3.5 to 3.65 this is how they got to 427ci. special cam, hi port heads, 13.5 comp and 2 piece hi rise dual 4 intake manifold were the big items that made the z11 motor such a beast. I believe they were rated around 500hp.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:35 AM.