Possible 70 sx?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 09:38 AM
  #1  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Possible 70 sx?

70 Cutlass Supreme w/ 455, TH400 The car has been repainted and the emblems are not there. I had a co-worker tell me about a guy at work selling a cutlass. I got in contact with the seller and what are the odds. His dad had showed me this car 30 yrs ago. It was a gold color at the time. His dad passed away 2 yrs ago and he's wanting to sell the car. Is there any other way to validate its an sx other than build sheet? It does have the braces from the lower control arms. 12 bolt rear end. The car was assembled at the Fremont CA plant. Any ideas on where the build sheet might be. Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
olds 5.jpg (65.6 KB, 105 views)
File Type: jpg
olds 6.jpg (62.7 KB, 70 views)
File Type: jpg
olds 1.jpg (44.5 KB, 81 views)
File Type: jpg
olds 2.jpg (63.0 KB, 89 views)
File Type: jpg
olds 3.jpg (90.2 KB, 85 views)
File Type: jpg
olds 4.jpg (112.9 KB, 85 views)

Last edited by 32redman; Oct 13, 2018 at 06:42 AM. Reason: added a line
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 10:07 AM
  #2  
tru-blue 442's Avatar
Old School Olds
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,265
From: Marble Falls TX
I found my build sheet on top of the gas tank. 70 442 Fremont built unit. I was surprised to see mine was a W-25 customer ordered car too. Good luck!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_1612.JPG (623.1 KB, 99 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_1621.JPG (577.4 KB, 97 views)
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 10:07 AM
  #3  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Paint Code 58 A is Burnished Gold Poly (58) with a white (A) convertible top. Frankly I think that would look better than the current color combo.


RPO L33 455 was available in the Supreme in 1970 without the SX package. Does the block VIN derivative match the car's VIN?
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 10:09 AM
  #4  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,244
From: Medford, Oregon
I'm not an expert with the SX by any means. But have you checked the engine vin derivative to be sure its the original engine to the car yet? Do you need some help finding that? I've found build sheets from two different Fremont cars on top of the gas tanks. There's several other potential locations, but if its had some work done to it this might be one place that wasn't disturbed yet. John
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 10:11 AM
  #5  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 14,244
From: Medford, Oregon
Looks like you guys both type faster than I do
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 10:14 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 2blu442
Looks like you guys both type faster than I do

That's what you get for being three hours behind.


The build sheet is the only way to prove the car is an SX, since the 455 was available without the SX package.
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 10:43 AM
  #7  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
That's what you get for being three hours behind.


The build sheet is the only way to prove the car is an SX, since the 455 was available without the SX package.
That's what I thought Joe. We shall see soon if everything goes right. Thanks
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 12:56 PM
  #8  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
You might want to check inside the trunk on the body line, or look inside the ventilation jamb to see if there's evidence of piercings from the SX body moldings. Same at the front fenders. If you find the build sheet look for RPO Y79. That's the guarantee it's an SX. Looking at the pictures, it's not that easy to say, it looks more like a standard 70 CS that has a 455/400
I'm a bit surprised that it has such a low Body number given it's production date at Fisher Body Works Freemont.
Old Jul 14, 2018 | 01:53 PM
  #9  
lunaboy's Avatar
The Rocket Astronomer
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,500
From: South Texas
chk the TH400 for code OD and chk the rear-end code for the 2:56;
also if it still has the original 2 barrel carb it is an SX specific stamp.
Like already stated the RPO L33 455 could have been ordered without the SX Y79 package, either way the hood is not correct and has been changed and it does not have the SX full body large trim.

Last edited by lunaboy; Jul 14, 2018 at 01:55 PM.
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 02:20 PM
  #10  
Chumley's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 511
Unhappy

I don't see the Y79 option on the build sheet either, seems like it would be there if was an SX. You still have a great power train though. I miss my SX from over 40 years ago now. Also I have never seen that hood on a '70 Supreme. I think they were used on the S model. If other panels were changed though, you would not find the filled holes of the SX emblems.

Last edited by Chumley; Aug 14, 2018 at 02:26 PM. Reason: addition
Old Aug 14, 2018 | 02:40 PM
  #11  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by Chumley
Also I have never seen that hood on a '70 Supreme. I think they were used on the S model..
Not according to the 1970 product brochure...


Old Aug 14, 2018 | 09:44 PM
  #12  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,437
From: Muskegon, Mi.
The data tags shows 05A as the build date, by then the 2bbl was history, and only 4bbls were available.
Old Oct 12, 2018 | 06:52 PM
  #13  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 32redman
All signs lean that it is an sx.
I know it's an older thread, but I am new to the forum and just came across this. My question to you is, what sign at all leans this towards being an SX? I don't see one single thing that indicates that it could possibly be an SX at all.
Old Oct 12, 2018 | 08:55 PM
  #14  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
Originally Posted by Allan R
Not according to the 1970 product brochure...

Dude, I would totally smash some 70s secretaries!
Old Oct 13, 2018 | 11:03 AM
  #15  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,086
From: Too close to Toronto!!
The Supreme has a different hood than an "S" or 442. There is a chrome windsplit in the middle, of a Supreme hood.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 04:42 PM
  #16  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Update on possible sx?

Well I finally was able to make a deal on the car. It is a #s matching 455, turbo 400 w/ O-D tag. Was able to get the trunk open that had some parts in a box. Found what was left of the build sheet. It does show the Y79 on the sheet bottom right. Vin at the top right of build sheet.
The drivers fender does have the holes for the sx emblem. The passenger side has filler in the holes.





Last edited by 32redman; Oct 19, 2018 at 05:20 PM. Reason: added photo
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 04:57 PM
  #17  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Wow, that's as close to not being there as I've ever seen. But it does match up with the engine and trans.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:10 PM
  #18  
rickman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 90
From: Raleigh, NC
Ahh, just looked at the first pic's and saw where the build sheet was found. Very nice score!

Last edited by rickman; Oct 19, 2018 at 05:13 PM.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:23 PM
  #19  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by Allan R
Wow, that's as close to not being there as I've ever seen. But it does match up with the engine and trans.
Tell me about it. Mice and roaches about ruined it for me.

Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:27 PM
  #20  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Yup. There's no doubt about it, That is a documented SX.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:29 PM
  #21  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Post a clearer image of the left side of that build sheet please.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:32 PM
  #22  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by asx455
Yup. There's no doubt about it, That is a documented SX.
Alan I was throwing the box of shredded paper and dead mouse & noticed what looked to be part of a build sheet. Took a closer look so glad I did.

Last edited by 32redman; Oct 19, 2018 at 05:32 PM. Reason: spelling
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:35 PM
  #23  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas

Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:36 PM
  #24  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 32redman
Alan I was throwing the box of shredded paper and dead mouse & noticed what looked to be part of a build sheet. Took a closer look so glad I did.
You got your Y79, you got your VIN, and they match the motor and trans stampings. It doesn't get much better than that. The left side of the build sheet tells us some real good info also.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:38 PM
  #25  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by asx455
You got your Y79, you got your VIN, and they match the motor and trans stampings. It doesn't get much better than that. The left side of the build sheet tells us some real good info also.
Clue me in a little of what you see.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 05:53 PM
  #26  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Well, first you have your build date of May 7th, then you have your engine code TP, your trans code OD, and rear end code R2-6. Below that you have your trim code for your interior, your exterior color, your top color, and your original wheels that came on the car. Even though we know it's a Freemont built car, the mice ate the original destination dealers address right off the sheet.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 06:20 PM
  #27  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by asx455
Well, first you have your build date of May 7th, then you have your engine code TP, your trans code OD, and rear end code R2-6. Below that you have your trim code for your interior, your exterior color, your top color, and your original wheels that came on the car. Even though we know it's a Freemont built car, the mice ate the original destination dealers address right off the sheet.
Thanks Alan. Good info Time to get started on the restore.
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 06:42 PM
  #28  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 32redman
Thanks Alan. Good info Time to get started on the restore.
First thing right off the bat is you need to source a correct hood and all the side chrome trim for a Supreme to include the wheel well mouldings in which the wrong ones are on the car now. Funny because the ones on the car now fit every other model except Supreme. The Supreme mouldings are unique to the Supreme only. And the front portion of the rear quarter mouldings (from the wheel opening to the door) have two different styles, Type 1 and Type 2. The later being on 71's which are one piece instead of two pieces. If you use the two piece moulding, be careful buying just the short corner piece as they have two versions of that piece alone, one is for 4 door cars and it is a little shorter than the one for the 2 door coupe.
Good luck with your project.
BTW, did you finally get it for a good price?
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 07:37 PM
  #29  
4speed455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,585
From: Modesto CA
I may be able to help with some of the trim.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...less-trim.html
Old Oct 19, 2018 | 10:05 PM
  #30  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,437
From: Muskegon, Mi.
May build = 4bbl instead of 2bbl for February and earlier builds. Shown on the build sheet. Any evidence of it being a W32?
Old Oct 20, 2018 | 12:04 PM
  #31  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 1969w3155
May build = 4bbl instead of 2bbl for February and earlier builds. Shown on the build sheet. Any evidence of it being a W32?
The evidence presented shows exactly what it is. How can you be asking about a W-32 when the build sheet clearly tells us what it is?
Old Oct 21, 2018 | 12:25 AM
  #32  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,437
From: Muskegon, Mi.
I did go back and see that it has the OD trans tag, so not a W32. The build sheet does not clearly show that. It shows Y79, and a 4bbl, no OD clearly on the sheet. Thanks for the arrogance.
Old Oct 21, 2018 | 07:28 AM
  #33  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
note: I believe this is what Dan is referring to. Specifically the last paragraph which refers to the W32 engine.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
SX bulletin1 (1).pdf (65.2 KB, 32 views)
Old Oct 21, 2018 | 12:00 PM
  #34  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 1969w3155
I did go back and see that it has the OD trans tag, so not a W32. The build sheet does not clearly show that. It shows Y79, and a 4bbl, no OD clearly on the sheet. Thanks for the arrogance.
I beg your pardon, but I'm not sure you are reading the right build sheet. The build sheet presented by 32redman for the car which is the subject of this thread, clearly shows the Transmission is an OD. It further clearly shows the the engine as being a Non- W32 455. I don't mean to be arrogant, but I am merely stating what is very clearly presented as a fact in front of us. No where does the original thread starter make any claim or show any indication that this car has AC either, but I can bet you it does have AC from reading that build sheet.
Old Oct 21, 2018 | 01:11 PM
  #35  
69 Ragtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 275
From: Lebanon, Ohio
Originally Posted by asx455
I beg your pardon, but I'm not sure you are reading the right build sheet. The build sheet presented by 32redman for the car which is the subject of this thread, clearly shows the Transmission is an OD. It further clearly shows the the engine as being a Non- W32 455. I don't mean to be arrogant, but I am merely stating what is very clearly presented as a fact in front of us. No where does the original thread starter make any claim or show any indication that this car has AC either, but I can bet you it does have AC from reading that build sheet.
We all come humbly to this forum with incomplete knowledge and with a desire to learn more. Some of us are more informed than others, and we make mistakes. My opinion? Post 31 could have been worded a little better...
Old Oct 25, 2018 | 03:25 PM
  #36  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 32redman
Thanks Alan. Good info Time to get started on the restore.
Another thing you should do is contact the SX registry and register it with them. You can find them at sx455.com.
Old Oct 26, 2018 | 10:35 AM
  #37  
32redman's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 78
From: South Texas
Originally Posted by asx455
Another thing you should do is contact the SX registry and register it with them. You can find them at sx455.com.
Will do. Thanks
Old Oct 26, 2018 | 11:43 PM
  #38  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,437
From: Muskegon, Mi.
clearly shows the Transmission is an OD.
Not even close.
Old Oct 27, 2018 | 05:18 PM
  #39  
asx455's Avatar
Alan Reedy
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Posts: 212
From: Rhode Island
Originally Posted by 1969w3155
Not even close.
Really??????

Maybe this will help you see it more clearly.




Hope that helps.
Old Oct 27, 2018 | 05:45 PM
  #40  
69 Ragtop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 275
From: Lebanon, Ohio
Originally Posted by asx455
Really??????

Maybe this will help you see it more clearly.




Hope that helps.
Y'know, you've got a whole 42 posts on this forum, responding to some that have 6,000+ posts. Maybe you should spend a little more time earning your stripes rather than being the resident expert. The "OD" would not be clear to all, unless all had a comprehensive understanding of all possible transmission codes.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:45 PM.