New to this forum with a 1968 442 (?) convertible - ClassicOldsmobile.com


The Newbie Forum The place where you should introduce yourself and make your first post.

Reply
 
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 23rd, 2011, 09:54 AM   #1
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10
New to this forum with a 1968 442 (?) convertible

Hello All! What a great resource this site is, with great people too! I have always been a big fan of the Oldsmobile cars of the musclecar era. I finally purchased one! A 1968 442 convertible. It is a serious project car. Restoration was started but the previous owner never found the time to continue its restoration. It was just disassembled. What beautiful lines these cars have! I have a question regarding the VIN and cowl buck tag. They do not match. The VIN tag in the dash tells me it is a 442. The dash is a 442. From the research that I have done this appears to be not only possible, but maybe typical of the 1968 year. Is this true? Please forgive my ignorance. Thanks!
twosfamily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2011, 09:59 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Tom442's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Denver
Posts: 619
Awesome! another 68 442 convertible! Welcome and get ready for us to hound you about posting some Pics!

Tom
68 442 convt (coming back together SLOWLY)
70 F85
95 Aurora
Tom442 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2011, 11:08 AM   #3
Registered User
 
allyolds68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Seneca Falls, NY
Posts: 3,646
Quote:
Originally Posted by twosfamily View Post
I have a question regarding the VIN and cowl buck tag. They do not match. The VIN tag in the dash tells me it is a 442. The cowl is a Cutlass. From the research that I have done this appears to be not only possible, but maybe typical of the 1968 year. Is this true? Please forgive my ignorance. Thanks!
I assume you meant "Cutlass" (bold above). Yes, 68 Lansing cars have a Cutlass Cowl tag not a 442. I assume your's is a Lansing (M in the VIN) car.
allyolds68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2011, 11:22 AM   #4
Registered User
 
LoganMiller68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Flint, Michigan
Posts: 156
Another Lansing 68 442, awesome!
LoganMiller68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2011, 01:50 PM   #5
Randy C.
 
rcorrigan5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,048
Mine is also a Lansing 4-4-2 vert with a Cutlass cowl tag. As I recall, all the assembly plants used Cutlass cowl tags on '68 4-4-2s but they all changed to a 4-4-2 cowl tag (with the exception of Lansing, who continued to use Cutlass cowl tags) for '69 4-4-2s.

For twosfamily, I picked my car up in 2003 as a body on a rolling frame, the engine on a stand, the THM 400 tranny laying on a dirt basement floor, and a bunch of parts scattered throughout the basement - some in boxes. It took about 4 years from the time we picked up the car to the time the restoration was completed.

As you start restoring and assembling your car, use this site if you have questions and you will surely get the answers you need. I know this site helped me tremendously in my restoration, plus in my general knowledge of Oldsmobiles.

Welcome aboard!

Randy C.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Olds68442front.jpg (44.2 KB, 7 views)
rcorrigan5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 23rd, 2011, 01:56 PM   #6
Moderator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Granbury, Texas
Posts: 24,413
Welcome, pics please!!
oldcutlass is online now   Reply With Quote
Old August 24th, 2011, 06:32 AM   #7
Administrator
 
Oldsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Red Oak Texas
Posts: 8,920
Welcome to CO.
Oldsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011, 01:48 PM   #8
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10
Thank you for clearing up my confusion with the cowl buck tag and the VIN. The VIN begins with 344678M. I do not have the original engine or transmission. I do have a 1970 Oldsmobile 455 4v that I was thinking about putting in it. Or, should I find a 1968 400? Any thoughts? If my research is correct, it would be impossible to find the original engine with my VIN stamped on it.
twosfamily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011, 06:56 PM   #9
Registered User
 
LoganMiller68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Flint, Michigan
Posts: 156
Put a 455 in it. I have a 68 442 as well, and it's #s matching 400 block in it right now. Those 400G blocks are P.O.S. I am building a 455 to put into mine, but will crate the 400 motor obviously for when I want this car to be original again.

Trust me, save your money on a 400 block and go right for a 455
LoganMiller68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26th, 2011, 09:58 AM   #10
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 24,164
Welcome, and as you've found out, the discrepancy between the VIN and the cowl tag on the 1968-69 442s is well documented in the factory literature, specifically in the Fisher Body Manual for those years. Even my 1969 Hurst/Olds has a 33687 cowl tag.
joe_padavano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26th, 2011, 10:27 AM   #11
Registered User
 
Aron Nance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 1,512
Welcome to CO! Long live the '68's! Glad you are with us. It may seem a daunting task, but you WILL be able to get the 442 back together. Much help from the folks on CO. Progress report when it's available.
Aron Nance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26th, 2011, 10:33 AM   #12
Moderator
 
Jamesbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 11,276
Welcome aboard
Jamesbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26th, 2011, 10:49 AM   #13
Registered User
 
LoganMiller68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Flint, Michigan
Posts: 156
If it Makes ya feel any better, I have a LONG road ahead of me with my car as well. I just rebuilt my 400 motor last year, and now I have a blown gasket and (hopefully not) more damage, and I wasn't ever driving it hard. (Reason why I said to avoid the 400G blocks) I've already got a lot of money into my 68 and it's not even close lol but I (and you) will be there eventually!
LoganMiller68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 31st, 2011, 04:13 PM   #14
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10
Thanks for the reassurance and guidance. Unfortunately, the recent tropical storm has put a damper on my plans. My barn has several issues now that must get fixed. I will be selling the 68 and a few other cars I have to pay for repairs. Thank you all again for your help.
twosfamily is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11th, 2011, 12:55 AM   #15
Registered User
 
spiderjason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 251
Welcome!!!!!! I love the 68's!!!!!
spiderjason is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New to the forum and my new Olds Baugher Garage The Newbie Forum 15 October 2nd, 2011 07:30 PM
New to Forum, not new to Olds bobbarry The Newbie Forum 6 September 10th, 2009 12:10 PM
New to Forum: 1966 442 Convertible glord 442 5 January 25th, 2009 10:30 AM
New to the forum, new to car restoration skinny Chassis/Body/Frame 5 April 23rd, 2007 03:46 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:17 AM.


All content Copyright 2008 by Internet Brands, Inc.