General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Tires 245/60/15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old July 19th, 2014 | 09:46 PM
  #41  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,179
From: Poteau, Ok
I have been running staggered wheel sizes for over 40 years, never had issues. Proper alignment and wheel balance are key. I would not recommend the P225-70's up front on your car as they may rub the rear portion of your wheel well. My car is lifted higher than stock but the tires did rub at the original height on heavy dips when turning.

IMHO, I doubt your going to be running your car hard enough to warrant a higher rating than "S". The BFG's are a good quality, reasonably priced tire that will give you years of safe driving and minimal problems. They still sell a 245-60-15 and if you need warranty replacements they are available in most cities nationwide.
Old July 20th, 2014 | 08:45 AM
  #42  
70wcar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 62
From: Connecticut
Another Photo

Originally Posted by dfire25
Jim can I bug you for a side pic of your setup, specifically the rear? I want to go with the 295-50-15's BFG's on my setup, mostly for a little better traction. They say that the minimum wheel width is 8" and a max of 11" for these tires. I don't know if I need a 15X8 or go with a 15X10 for the rear. Beutiful car by the way. Thanks, Dave
Dave,


Here is the only "side" view I can find on my pc now. I have more on my portable hard drive but left it at work on Friday.


I picked 15 x 8 because after measuring, they pretty much centered the tires in the rear wheel wells. I did a lot of measuring to insure no rubbing, especially on cornering. I put together an article for our local newsletter detailing what I did and it had the specs for the stock wheels vs. the aftermarket as well. I am assuming all this is also on my other drive as well because I can't find it here.

Let me know if you want more info. I can always pull the car out and take a few more. You can also email me directly at Jim70442w30@aol.com


Jim
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Jims_70_100_0121-c.jpg (73.2 KB, 83 views)
Old July 20th, 2014 | 08:55 AM
  #43  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
more

I do not need a tire review on the Mickey Thompson ST radial as I already own them. They are on my 1972 W-30. These are well made, smooth riding tires that balanced without issue. They hook a lot better than the hard as a hockey puck BFG Radial TA.


I have a buddy with the exact same rims & tires on his 1971 442. We both prefer this tire to the BFG or Firestone Indy 500 that we had previously run. We are both running 225 70 15s up front on 7" rims & 275 60 15s out back on 8" rims. No rubbing issues what so ever & a great stance.


You are placing far too much emphasis on that one tire review that you read. Mickey Thompson tires are a quality product.

Best of luck with your decision.


Here is what my car looks like with the above mentioned rims & tires.


DSCN6720.jpg

Last edited by oldsmobiledave; July 20th, 2014 at 08:59 AM.
Old July 20th, 2014 | 09:29 AM
  #44  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,179
From: Poteau, Ok
I agree the MT tires are a very good tire that have been around since I was a kid in the early 70's. As with most of the products on Summit people never write a review, it's unfortunate that the one review was negative. The only drawback to the MT tires is if you need a replacement they will need to be ordered.
Old July 20th, 2014 | 03:51 PM
  #45  
dfire25's Avatar
"Trying to fix her right"
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 749
From: Bartlett IL
[QUOTE=70wcar;724211]Dave,


Here is the only "side" view I can find on my pc now. I have more on my portable hard drive but left it at work on Friday.


I picked 15 x 8 because after measuring, they pretty much centered the tires in the rear wheel wells. I did a lot of measuring to insure no rubbing, especially on cornering. I put together an article for our local newsletter detailing what I did and it had the specs for the stock wheels vs. the aftermarket as well. I am assuming all this is also on my other drive as well because I can't find it here.

Let me know if you want more info. I can always pull the car out and take a few more. You can also email me directly at Jim70442w30@aol.com
[QUOTE=70wcar;724211]


Thanks Jim. I like the 15X8's as well. The only problem I have with the 15X10's is that it makes the rim look more deep dish. I like the stock look of the 8's myself. But then again I've only see pictures of the 15X10's, I've never seen one in person.

From your side pict though the 8's look pritty good with the 295's. I was afraid of it looking too wide tire on a narrow rim look. The tire seems to roll in more when it's too wide for the rim.

Last edited by dfire25; July 20th, 2014 at 03:55 PM.
Old July 20th, 2014 | 05:07 PM
  #46  
70cutty's Avatar
Beer Connoisseur
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,091
From: Daly City, California
295/50 on a 10" rim. Cooper cobra tires. I really like the way it looks on my car.


[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG]IMG_2267 by 70cutty, on Flickr[/IMG]
Old July 20th, 2014 | 07:49 PM
  #47  
MudEye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 313
From: Chattanooga Tn.
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
I run P275-60-15 rear and P225-70-15 front.


Could I then run your setup in back (p275 or 255) and front (235/60/15 225/60/15)
For a good stance without compromising fender clearance. Your thoughts....
Love the stance on your 67!

Also With my whole new front end kit replacement.... and rear... Raised my car a good 4 inches( totally worn out shocks,springs,tyrods, ball joints bushings,etc.) front and back. So there is no sag as of now.It stands up and salutes! I'll show the before and after pictures after my new tires.........
Old July 20th, 2014 | 08:16 PM
  #48  
Gary's 2 442-S's Avatar
Gary
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,216
From: Houston,Tx
I am running 255 60 15 on the front with 7'' SS1 and 275 60 15 on the back with 8'' rims. I get absolutely no rubbing.
Old July 21st, 2014 | 08:36 AM
  #49  
MudEye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 313
From: Chattanooga Tn.
[QUOTE=oldsmobiledave;724214


We are both running 225 70 15s up front on 7" rims & 275 60 15s out back on 8" rims. No rubbing issues what so ever & a great stance.


You are placing far too much emphasis on that one tire review that you read. Mickey Thompson tires are a quality product.



Point taken...... I.m wondering if your setup would rub on mine ( up front) not sure if our fender clearance is the same.
Old July 21st, 2014 | 09:16 AM
  #50  
Nilsson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,076
From: Columbus, OH
[QUOTE=oldsmobiledave;724214]I do not need a tire review on the Mickey Thompson ST radial as I already own them. They are on my 1972 W-30. These are well made, smooth riding tires that balanced without issue. They hook a lot better than the hard as a hockey puck BFG Radial TA.





I concur, the MT's are a very good tire.

Last edited by Nilsson; July 21st, 2014 at 09:18 AM.
Old July 21st, 2014 | 11:18 AM
  #51  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,179
From: Poteau, Ok
If your replaced your springs and the car sits higher I would not hesitate to use the same tires on your wheels. Mine in back are 8.5x15 and 6x15 in front, but you can run the same 8" wheel all the way around with these sizes. It should look really nice and fill the wheel wells. I use Discount tire in my area and my relationship with them allowed me to order a few different size tires and wheels in and see which actually worked best. Good luck!
Old July 21st, 2014 | 03:53 PM
  #52  
BlackGold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,587
From: West Michigan
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
IMHO, I doubt your going to be running your car hard enough to warrant a higher rating than "S".
Why run a speed rating higher than S? Because ....

....Tires built to not melt at high speeds are of sturdier construction and do a lot better job of keeping the sidewalls from rolling and the tread flat on the ground. This gives much-inproved handling and actually increases tread life, even though such tires are often made of softer compound. At least that's my experience.

In this age of government safety rules, I can't figure out why they allow hard rubber, high-mileage tires. A high-performance tire is the best safety measure you can take for you and your car -- with the exception of simply paying attention.
Old July 21st, 2014 | 06:12 PM
  #53  
MudEye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 313
From: Chattanooga Tn.
[QUOTE=70cutty;724395]295/50 on a 10" rim. Cooper cobra tires. I really like the way it looks on my car.



Looks beautiful..... even without the white letters. Did you turn the white letters to the inside?

Last edited by MudEye; July 21st, 2014 at 07:07 PM.
Old July 22nd, 2014 | 02:21 PM
  #54  
Double D Farms's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 118
From: Indiana
I'm running 245/60/15 Cooper Cobras on SSIs with 4 1/4" back space on our '69 convertible. I got the wheels & tires from Summit Racing. Go to page 3 of this link.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...nvertible.html
Old July 23rd, 2014 | 02:55 PM
  #55  
dfire25's Avatar
"Trying to fix her right"
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 749
From: Bartlett IL
Originally Posted by Double D Farms
I'm running 245/60/15 Cooper Cobras on SSIs with 4 1/4" back space on our '69 convertible. I got the wheels & tires from Summit Racing. Go to page 3 of this link.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...nvertible.html
I'll probably buy mine from Summit when I'm ready too. Car looks great!
Old July 24th, 2014 | 06:53 AM
  #56  
Double D Farms's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 118
From: Indiana
Thanks, we are almost done with it now. I did a lot of research & for the wheels, tires & center caps Summit was by far the least expensive. I wasn't happy with the way they packaged them for shipping (two centers & some lug nuts got lost in shipping). But they did take care of me on that.
Originally Posted by dfire25
I'll probably buy mine from Summit when I'm ready too. Car looks great!
Old July 24th, 2014 | 08:48 AM
  #57  
dfire25's Avatar
"Trying to fix her right"
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 749
From: Bartlett IL
Originally Posted by Double D Farms
Thanks, we are almost done with it now. I did a lot of research & for the wheels, tires & center caps Summit was by far the least expensive. I wasn't happy with the way they packaged them for shipping (two centers & some lug nuts got lost in shipping). But they did take care of me on that.
I've been very happy with Summit's costumer service. I had a couple parts that had problems and even ordered the wrong size on a couple of things and they corrected the problems without a hassle and fast.
Old July 24th, 2014 | 09:01 AM
  #58  
70cutty's Avatar
Beer Connoisseur
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,091
From: Daly City, California
[QUOTE=MudEye;724798]
Originally Posted by 70cutty
295/50 on a 10" rim. Cooper cobra tires. I really like the way it looks on my car.



Looks beautiful..... even without the white letters. Did you turn the white letters to the inside?
Thanks. Yes white letters are on the inside, I tried both ways and I like them better that way.
Old July 27th, 2014 | 08:55 PM
  #59  
MudEye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 313
From: Chattanooga Tn.
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
I do not need a tire review on the Mickey Thompson ST radial as I already own them. They are on my 1972 W-30. These are well made, smooth riding tires that balanced without issue. They hook a lot better than the hard as a hockey puck BFG Radial TA.


I have a buddy with the exact same rims & tires on his 1971 442. We both prefer this tire to the BFG or Firestone Indy 500 that we had previously run. We are both running 225 70 15s up front on 7" rims & 275 60 15s out back on 8" rims. No rubbing issues what so ever & a great stance.


You are placing far too much emphasis on that one tire review that you read. Mickey Thompson tires are a quality product.

Best of luck with your decision.


Here is what my car looks like with the above mentioned rims & tires.


Old July 27th, 2014 | 09:24 PM
  #60  
MudEye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 313
From: Chattanooga Tn.
Red face

[QUOTE=oldsmobiledave;724214]I do not need a tire review on the Mickey Thompson ST radial as I already own them. They are on my 1972 W-30. These are well made, smooth riding tires that balanced without issue. They hook a lot better than the hard as a hockey puck BFG Radial TA.


I have a buddy with the exact same rims & tires on his 1971 442. We both prefer this tire to the BFG or Firestone Indy 500 that we had previously run. We are both running 225 70 15s up front on 7" rims & 275 60 15s out back on 8" rims. No rubbing issues what so ever & a great stance.


You are placing far too much emphasis on that one tire review that you read. Mickey Thompson tires are a quality product.

Best of luck with your decision.


Thanks everyone. Decided on Mickey Thompson 255/60/15 Rear 235/60/15 Front Very happy indeed! Great look, traction,etc. So now I have a New Front end ( shocks ,springs, ball joints, tyrids, bushings,New rims,brakes, tires. But I think the steering box is out.All over the road. Wow! I have to fight to keep it in the lane! Like driving a boat! Now looking at steering boxes
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
119_1937.JPG (140.2 KB, 65 views)
Old July 27th, 2014 | 09:30 PM
  #61  
dfire25's Avatar
"Trying to fix her right"
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 749
From: Bartlett IL
[QUOTE=MudEye;727124]
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
I do not need a tire review on the Mickey Thompson ST radial as I already own them. They are on my 1972 W-30. These are well made, smooth riding tires that balanced without issue. They hook a lot better than the hard as a hockey puck BFG Radial TA.


I have a buddy with the exact same rims & tires on his 1971 442. We both prefer this tire to the BFG or Firestone Indy 500 that we had previously run. We are both running 225 70 15s up front on 7" rims & 275 60 15s out back on 8" rims. No rubbing issues what so ever & a great stance.


You are placing far too much emphasis on that one tire review that you read. Mickey Thompson tires are a quality product.

Best of luck with your decision.


Thanks everyone. Decided on Mickey Thompson 255/60/15 Rear 235/60/15 Front Very happy indeed! Great look, traction,etc. So now I have a New Front end ( shocks ,springs, ball joints, tyrids, bushings,New rims,brakes, tires. But I think the steering box is out.All over the road. Wow! I have to fight to keep it in the lane! Like driving a boat! Now looking at steering boxes
Looks great! Plus the Micky's where cheaper then the BFG's I think.

Does the 93-97 Jeep Grand Cherokee steering box fit the 66-67 body style? A lot of guys have been changing over to these boxes to tighten up the steering. I'm planing on doing the same with my 71 soon.
Old July 28th, 2014 | 01:12 AM
  #62  
z11375ss's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,941
[QUOTE=MudEye;727124]
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
I do not need a tire review on the Mickey Thompson ST radial as I already own them. They are on my 1972 W-30. These are well made, smooth riding tires that balanced without issue. They hook a lot better than the hard as a hockey puck BFG Radial TA.


I have a buddy with the exact same rims & tires on his 1971 442. We both prefer this tire to the BFG or Firestone Indy 500 that we had previously run. We are both running 225 70 15s up front on 7" rims & 275 60 15s out back on 8" rims. No rubbing issues what so ever & a great stance.


You are placing far too much emphasis on that one tire review that you read. Mickey Thompson tires are a quality product.

Best of luck with your decision.


Thanks everyone. Decided on Mickey Thompson 255/60/15 Rear 235/60/15 Front Very happy indeed! Great look, traction,etc. So now I have a New Front end ( shocks ,springs, ball joints, tyrids, bushings,New rims,brakes, tires. But I think the steering box is out.All over the road. Wow! I have to fight to keep it in the lane! Like driving a boat! Now looking at steering boxes
SHARP!
Old July 28th, 2014 | 08:12 PM
  #63  
MudEye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 313
From: Chattanooga Tn.
[QUOTE=dfire25;727125]
Originally Posted by MudEye

Looks great! Plus the Micky's where cheaper then the BFG's I think.

Does the 93-97 Jeep Grand Cherokee steering box fit the 66-67 body style? A lot of guys have been changing over to these boxes to tighten up the steering. I'm planing on doing the same with my 71 soon.
Yes they were about 30.00 dollars per tire less expensive. I love BFG. I wanted a a less expensive tire. Doesn't mean it's less quality ( Mickey Thompson). I'm totally impressed with them. Looks and tread pattern are attractive in real time. Not as much in a picture.
Not sure about the Jeep steering box. I'll probably go with the variable speed agr steering box. As I've read that the fast ratio 12:1 is a bit tight and hard to adjust to. But others may have a differing opinion.

Last edited by MudEye; July 29th, 2014 at 05:28 AM.
Old July 28th, 2014 | 08:40 PM
  #64  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
WTF Mickey Johnson ???

[QUOTE=MudEye;727558]
Originally Posted by dfire25

Yes they were about 30.00 dollars per tire less expensive. I love BFG. I wanted a a less expensive tire. Doesn't mean it's less quality ( Mickey Johnson). I'm totally impressed with them. Looks and tread pattern are awesome. Along with the ss1 rims, they are a head turner for sure.
Not sure about the Jeep steering box. I'll probably go with the variable speed agr steering box. As I've read that the fast ratio 12:1 is a bit tight and hard to adjust to. But others may have a differing opinion.


Please it is MICKEY THOMPSON not JOHNSON!
Old August 14th, 2014 | 06:12 PM
  #65  
MudEye's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 313
From: Chattanooga Tn.
QUOTE=dfire25;727125]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MudEye View Post

Looks great! Plus the Micky's where cheaper then the BFG's I think.

Does the 93-97 Jeep Grand Cherokee steering box fit the 66-67 body style? A lot of guys have been changing over to these boxes to tighten up the steering. I'm planing on doing the same with my 71 soon.

I ended up buying the variable speed ration Agr box 13 to 16:1 from Year one for 349.00 that is a exact replacement with no modifications at all.And is new ( I guess new refurb) for 349.00 ( 370.00 after ship). It is the same Agr model no. Agr 292317 that all other website's sell. Not sure why Year One advertises as a different model. But I called them directly and they affirmed it was one in the same. Funny thing is that the Agr 292317 is selling for 409.00 at Summit , 395.00 at Jegs , and much higher at other vendors. Let you know how it drives compared to the boat steering I now have.

Last edited by MudEye; August 14th, 2014 at 06:19 PM.
Old August 17th, 2014 | 02:20 PM
  #66  
bigrig12's Avatar
Billy
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 51
From: St. Albert, Alberta...just outside of Edmonton
Beautiful...the tires, wheels and stance look perfect on your car!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
442b
Wheels and Tires
14
July 3rd, 2020 11:02 AM
pappanick
Parts For Sale
13
October 18th, 2014 09:32 AM
REOLDS
Parts For Sale
5
July 22nd, 2012 08:08 PM
oldzy
Wheels and Tires
7
November 23rd, 2011 05:37 PM
Jayycobb
Wheels and Tires
0
October 25th, 2011 11:34 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:21 PM.