General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

VIN vs Body number

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February 28th, 2017 | 06:06 AM
  #1  
pdsap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
VIN vs Body number

Hi everyone,
My '68 Olds 442 convertible has a VIN of 344678M------ and a body code number on the cowl tag of 68-33667 LAN (Lansing I assume). Based on the VIN, I assume it is a true Olds 442... correct? Was the body number assigned at a different time and was it normal practice that the body number did not match the first five digits of the VIN on 442's? Did it ever? Always is a point of discussion among car enthusiast about numbers matching on a 442.

Thanks,
Phil
Old February 28th, 2017 | 06:42 AM
  #2  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,495
From: southeastern Michigan
Yes, based on the VIN, your car is a '68 442 convertible built at Lansing. There is no correlation between the VIN and the body number on the cowl tag for 442s or any other Oldsmobile. The cowl tag body number is not decode-able. If you post a photo of the cowl tag, the numbers and letters can be decoded to give more information about your car.
Old February 28th, 2017 | 07:03 AM
  #3  
pdsap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Super... I have attached a picture of the cowl tag on my '68 442.

Look forward from hearing back from you.
Phil
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
68 Olds Cowl Tag.jpg (200.6 KB, 76 views)
File Type: jpg
68 Olds Trim Tag.jpg (4.54 MB, 77 views)
Old February 28th, 2017 | 07:12 AM
  #4  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,495
From: southeastern Michigan
06D = build date = 4th week (D) of June (6), and that would be June 1968, so this car was built relatively late in the model year.

68 = model year
3 = Oldsmobile
36 = Cutlass (your car is 442 based on the VIN, but the cowl tags didn't reflect this that year)
67 = convertible body style
LAN = Lansing assembly plant
432654 = Fisher Body sequence number
TR949 = this would give you the interior color and seat type, but I don't have 949 in my decoder, so perhaps someone else here will have it
Paint F = lower body color = "teal frost"
Paint 1 = convertible top color = white
Old February 28th, 2017 | 07:46 AM
  #5  
pdsap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Great! Thank you so much for the breakdown. And yes, the 949 is a strange interior code. I found it hidden in a web site. It stands for Teal bucket seat interior.

Thanks again,
Phil
Old February 28th, 2017 | 08:09 AM
  #6  
pdsap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Originally Posted by jaunty75
Yes, based on the VIN, your car is a '68 442 convertible built at Lansing. There is no correlation between the VIN and the body number on the cowl tag for 442s or any other Oldsmobile. The cowl tag body number is not decode-able. If you post a photo of the cowl tag, the numbers and letters can be decoded to give more information about your car.


Forgot to ask... was there a year when the body number correlated to the VIN on an Olds 442?

Phil
Old February 28th, 2017 | 09:00 AM
  #7  
rcorrigan5's Avatar
Randy C.
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,268
From: Albany, OR
949 is the interior color and front seat type...which breaks to teal in color with bucket seats.

The body number is actually the number just to the left of "BODY" on your trim tag.

The number to the right of "ST" is the "style" number, 68 33667, which gives the year, GM division (3=Oldsmobile), model series (36=Cutlass V8, and body type (67=convertible).

For '68 and I believe '69, Lansing just used the Cutlass V8 designation of 36 for the style number. The other assembly plants varied, with most going to 44. By the 1970 model year, all used 44 in the trim tag.

Randy C.
Old February 28th, 2017 | 09:35 AM
  #8  
pdsap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Thank you Randy. Looks like you have solved the mystery.

Phil
Old February 28th, 2017 | 09:47 AM
  #9  
droldsmorland's Avatar
CH3NO2 LEARN IT BURN IT
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,040
From: Land of Taxes
Phil, You are not allowed to post here, then make us drool and not upload pictures! LOL...Sounds like a nice color combo. Pics please.
Old February 28th, 2017 | 10:00 AM
  #10  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,377
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by pdsap
Hi everyone,
My '68 Olds 442 convertible has a VIN of 344678M------ and a body code number on the cowl tag of 68-33667 LAN (Lansing I assume). Based on the VIN, I assume it is a true Olds 442... correct? Was the body number assigned at a different time and was it normal practice that the body number did not match the first five digits of the VIN on 442's? Did it ever? Always is a point of discussion among car enthusiast about numbers matching on a 442.

Thanks,
Phil
This comes up about every couple of months. It is very well documented that for the 1968 and 1969 model year only, Olds used Cutlass cowl tags (36xx body code) on real 442s. Most 1968 cars and many 1969 cars came this way, and Lansing built cars were most often built this way. Here's a page from the factory Parts Book that talks about it.


Old February 28th, 2017 | 12:09 PM
  #11  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,495
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by pdsap
Forgot to ask... was there a year when the body number correlated to the VIN on an Olds 442?
No, no, and no. There was never any year that the body number corresponded to anything for any Oldsmobile, 442 or not. Forget the body number. It means nothing. Nada. Zilch. No one has ever been able to determine anything from a body number, and the people who might have ever been able to are long dead and the records that could have told us what the body number means are buried with them.
Old February 28th, 2017 | 12:18 PM
  #12  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,377
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by jaunty75
No, no, and no. There was never any year that the body number corresponded to anything for any Oldsmobile, 442 or not. Forget the body number. It means nothing. Nada. Zilch. No one has ever been able to determine anything from a body number, and the people who might have ever been able to are long dead and the records that could have told us what the body number means are buried with them.
The OP is talking about the body STYLE number (or Fisher Body model code in the table I posted), as in 3687, with normally would correspond to the second through fifth characters of the VIN, EXCEPT on the 1968-69 442s. You are talking about the Fisher Body sequential build number, which is different and does not correspond.
Old February 28th, 2017 | 12:28 PM
  #13  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,495
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The OP is talking about the body STYLE number, as in 3687
I'm glad you can read his mind because I can't. He's been calling it the body number since the beginning, and since there is a BDY on the cowl tag, which stands for "body" and which refers to the meaningless collection of digits to the left of it, I assumed that that's what he's talking about. Silly me.

What he's talking about, apparently, is as you say, the STYLE number. That's what the "ST" at the beginning stands for. If it was a "body style number," a term which no one uses, it would be BST!


Let's use the '64 cowl tag as an example. See? To the left, "STYLE". To the right "BODY." Nowhere on there is there something called "body style." Ugh!

Old February 28th, 2017 | 12:30 PM
  #14  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,377
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by jaunty75
I'm glad you can read his mind because I can't.
Yes, I can read his mind, because the question is about the 1968-69 442s that have Cutlass cowl tags. His post also specifically says "body CODE number", which is the Fisher Body model code (which is exactly the term on the page I posted from the Oldsmobile parts book, so SOMEBODY uses it), not the sequential build number.
Old February 28th, 2017 | 03:32 PM
  #15  
pdsap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Originally Posted by droldsmorland
Phil, You are not allowed to post here, then make us drool and not upload pictures! LOL...Sounds like a nice color combo. Pics please.
Ok... since you asked, attached is a picture of our 442. The color should be the lighter Teal Frost (code F) but the previous owner changed it (and did a beautiful job) to the darker Teal Blue Metallic (Code L). We really like the color with the white convertible top and teal interior so we are keeping it this way.

Thanks everyone for your great help!
Phil
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1968 Olds 442 - L side.JPG (3.69 MB, 60 views)
Old March 1st, 2017 | 09:08 AM
  #16  
droldsmorland's Avatar
CH3NO2 LEARN IT BURN IT
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,040
From: Land of Taxes
Very nice Phil.
Old March 1st, 2017 | 12:04 PM
  #17  
pdsap's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 83
Yes everyone... I incorrectly called it a body number when actually I was referring to the Style number which follows after the "ST". Sorry for any confusion or conflict I caused. Thank you for setting me straight.

Phil
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Alg
General Questions
7
January 1st, 2013 05:04 PM
BigBertha442
442
8
March 1st, 2008 08:16 AM
jrblanke
Cutlass
7
December 25th, 2007 01:49 PM
1972madison
Cutlass
3
August 3rd, 2007 06:35 PM
olds53rocket
Chassis/Body/Frame
2
December 22nd, 2006 05:46 PM



Quick Reply: VIN vs Body number



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:17 AM.