ClassicOldsmobile.com  

Go Back   ClassicOldsmobile.com > Vehicle Lineup > Cutlass
Forums Gallery Encyclopedia Tech Olds Junction Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2007, 01:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
69-Sguy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
rear ratio

Odd question, maybe someone could help. I was trying to determine what gears I have (because I've got a real dog out the hole), so I used the tried and true method of jacking up the rear, marking both the driveshaft and the power tire (right rear). I spun the driveshaft by hand until (with help watching) I had the tire rotate 10 times, all the while counting my drivshaft rotations. It turned out to be 14 driveshaft rotations to 10 tire rotations. Could this be right, a 1.4:1 gearset? Anyone ever heard of this? It's a 69 Cutlass convert, and I'm almost positive the rear is origional. Did they even make a rear this low? If so, I guess I now know why I have no acceleration from a standstill. Thanks and Happy Holidays.
__________________
Go topless and feel the breeze
69-Sguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!
Old 11-18-2007, 02:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
Redog
Alero Chapter Secretary
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Newtown, PA
Posts: 777
Is there an RPO code sheet on the trunk lid?

Probably a 2 series gear. I would guess 2.56 or 2.73

The code should be a GU code, and G80 which is a posi
Redog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2007, 08:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
88 coupe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 1,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by 69-Sguy View Post
........ 14 driveshaft rotations to 10 tire rotations ........
If you had turned both tires (like when the car moves) you would have counted 28 driveshaft revs, or 28:1 = 2.8:1. You could have turned the single tire 20 (10 for each wheel) times, to get 28:10 = 2.8:1.

From where you are now, it's easier to multiply your 14 revs, by 2 to compensate for the missing 14 turns = 2.8:10 = 2.8:1.

Quote:
........ Did they even make a rear this low? ........
In this context, 1.4:1 is a high gear. 6:1 is a low gear.

Norm
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texascarnut View Post
........ I think you are more of an irritant to everyone here, and most certainly not nearly as smart or knowledgeable as you seem to think you are.
88 coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2007, 07:56 AM   #4 (permalink)
sexycutlass69
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 13
Smile

I'll hit you up on your PM!
__________________
LIVE LIFE!
sexycutlass69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
gear ratio question jeffs 89 cutlass salon Drivetrain/Differentials 1 08-21-2007 07:57 PM
1966 442 Gear Ratio 442 Guatemala 442 2 07-25-2007 12:27 AM
62 Dynamic 88 rear end ratio 394 Natas Eighty-Eight 1 05-23-2007 05:22 AM
1955 rear end ratio keith6989 Drivetrain/Differentials 7 03-31-2007 04:37 AM
57 olds rear end: sta wag vs sedan ratio benkerr Drivetrain/Differentials 1 08-26-2006 07:41 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
All content Copyright © 2008 by Internet Brands, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34