ClassicOldsmobile.com  

Go Back   ClassicOldsmobile.com > Repair & Restoration > Big Blocks
Forums Gallery Encyclopedia Tech Olds Junction Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-22-2007, 01:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
Swed Olds
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Värmland, Sweden
Posts: 11
394 crankshaft 1964

Hi
My question is: is there anyone who knows how big the different could be if you measure the area were the rods are mounted for the crankshaft of 394 from 1964. One rod is broken and the piston has some damage, so I’m a little worried that the crankshaft is not OK.
Thanks!
Swed Olds is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!
Old 07-22-2007, 08:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
Blownolds
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 24
If it helps you any, the crankshafts are supposed to be the same from '62-4.

From '59-61 there are differences in main bearing widths, but you might possibly be able to measure the rod journal widths from those years as well. I am not aware that that was changed any over the years from '59-64 on rod journals, but I could be wrong.
Blownolds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2007, 04:40 PM   #3 (permalink)
Olds64
Landyacht Club President
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 1,811
The 1964 394 connecting rod bearing journal diameter is 2.4988 to 2.4998 inches, or 2.4893 to 2.4988 inches with an "X" on the left front face of the block. When you measure your crank most of the connecting rod journals should measure about the same. Then all you have to do is order the proper bearings to have the slop machined out of your crankshaft.
Olds64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 10:49 AM   #4 (permalink)
Swed Olds
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Värmland, Sweden
Posts: 11
More thoughts!

Thanks for the information, i even want to know how much it could differ between the different connecting rod journals and the centre of the crankshaft. What I’m a little bit afraid of is that the crankshaft has been crooked.
Swed Olds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2007, 02:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
88 coupe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 1,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swed Olds View Post
........ What I’m a little bit afraid of is that the crankshaft has been crooked.
Your crank is forged steel, so it is possible though not likely.

After an "in person" examination, your crank grinder will be able to answer any questions you might have.

Norm
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texascarnut View Post
........ I think you are more of an irritant to everyone here, and most certainly not nearly as smart or knowledgeable as you seem to think you are.
88 coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
All content Copyright © 2008 by Internet Brands, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34