ClassicOldsmobile.com  

Go Back   ClassicOldsmobile.com > Vehicle Lineup > 442
Forums Gallery Encyclopedia Tech Olds Junction Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2008, 05:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Jolly Green
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
Tubular Suspension

Any of your guys get a suspension kit for your 442? It seems like most 442 guys are more interested in stock restoration than modernization. I was curious as to what you thought about the kits and what did you upgrade and where did you get them?
Jolly Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
To remove this ad, register today!
Old 01-10-2008, 06:45 PM   #2 (permalink)
88 coupe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 1,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Green View Post
........ stock restoration than modernization ........
Modernization for the sake of modernization? Or showmanship? Or do you actually have a practical reason to modify a perfectly good design?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Green View Post
........ what you thought about the kits ........
Unless one actually has a reason, they would be a waste of time and money.

Norm
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texascarnut View Post
........ I think you are more of an irritant to everyone here, and most certainly not nearly as smart or knowledgeable as you seem to think you are.
88 coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 07:41 PM   #3 (permalink)
Jolly Green
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
Well, I'm still not sold on the new kit. I want to improve handling, but I haven't gotten the car on the road yet, so I don't know how they handle stock. That's my only reasoning, not for showmanship or the sake of.
Jolly Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2008, 08:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
88 coupe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 1,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Green View Post
........ I want to improve handling ........
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Green View Post
........ I don't know how they handle stock ........
I think, I will let someone else take it from here.

Norm
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texascarnut View Post
........ I think you are more of an irritant to everyone here, and most certainly not nearly as smart or knowledgeable as you seem to think you are.
88 coupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:47 AM   #5 (permalink)
Olds64
Landyacht Club President
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 1,811
Jolly Green, I suggest you put new bushings and ball joints on your current suspension. A short long arm suspension is about as high tech as you are going to get. They still use SLA suspensions on high end exotic cars. Be glad you don't have a king pin suspension with leaf springs.

I installed a PST kit on my 64 98 and was very happy with it. I put in new shocks but left the springs the way they were. It handled like a dream afterward. You can get the poly graphite bushings for "improved" handling. However, I don't know if these work the way they are advertised. I installed rubber bushings in my car for a "softer" ride. I haven't heard anything bad about poly graphite though.

If you really want to "beef up" your suspension I suggest looking into heavy duty sway bars for your front and rear suspension. You might also get high dollar shocks and new springs. However, you have to ask yourself what you want from your car. I don't think any Oldsmobile is going to run slalom courses, even if you put big money into the suspension. They are just too BIG.
__________________
"Some men are Baptists, others Catholics. My father was an OLDSMOBILE man." Ralphie Billingsley A Christmas Story 1983
"We rei-eign, supreme, ooooh god! Burrito supreme, and a chicken supreme, and a CUTLASS SUPREME!" Tenacious D 2007
Olds64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 09:23 AM   #6 (permalink)
Jolly Green
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
Year One offers a full Prothane red polyurethane bushing kit for the 66-72 Cutlass/442's. Includes ball joint boots, control arm bushings, sway bar end links, tie rod boots and transmission mount. What do you think about that as opposed to a tubular suspension modification?
Jolly Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:23 AM   #7 (permalink)
joe_padavano
Moderator
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Green View Post
Year One offers a full Prothane red polyurethane bushing kit for the 66-72 Cutlass/442's. Includes ball joint boots, control arm bushings, sway bar end links, tie rod boots and transmission mount. What do you think about that as opposed to a tubular suspension modification?
These are not mutually exclusive. The goal is to eliminate unwanted motion and deflections in the suspension so the tires travel in the intended directions. These deflections come from many sources - unwanted motion in the soft rubber bushings, flexing of the control arms, looseness in the wheel bearings and ball joints, etc. The tubular arms are intended to be stiffer than the stock stamped control arms, thus eliminating that deflection source. Poly bushings are intended to be stiffer than rubber, tightening up that deflection source.

Note that SOME deflection in the rubber is required, particularly at the rear four-bar suspension arms. The stock GM suspension is designed to twist the upper arms slightly as the suspension moves up and down. The stock rubber bushings have enough flexibility to accommodate this. Using poly bushings in both ends of all four arms at the rear, particularly with stiff tubular arms, will cause binding. You must use the upper arms with the metal ball joint at the forward end to eliminate the binding.

Looking at the front suspension, I find the Global West arms to be much better built (and stiffer) than the Hotchkis arms (at least, speaking as an aerospace engineer). Global West also uses their del-a-lum bushings, which are concentric aluminum bushings with a teflon liner. These are MUCH stiffer than even poly, but have grease fittings so they won't squeak. Of course, the ride quality suffers.
__________________
Joe Padavano

64 Jetstar 88 Conv
66 442 L-69 Conv
68 W-30
69 H/O
69 442
70 W-30
72 442
84 Custom Cruiser
86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds)
joe_padavano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 10:41 AM   #8 (permalink)
Jolly Green
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
Ahhhh, now its all starting to make sense.

Here's what I was thinking about, let me know if I'm off the rocker.

Global West front end kit (modified to have disc brakes)
Hotchkis Total Vehicle System for the rear end (boxed rear links and modified for disc brakes)

What do you guys think? Oh, and they make the Global Wests with Poly OR Del-A-Lum bushings. Would poly still improve the handling but enhance the ride or will it just negate the effects of the tubular suspension? Basically, which would you recommend?

Joe, who do you do Aero Eng for? My BS (so to speak) was in AsE from Univ Of Cincinnati. Worked at Air Force Research Labs for a few years before joining the service.

Last edited by Jolly Green : 01-11-2008 at 10:53 AM.
Jolly Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 11:05 AM   #9 (permalink)
olds1968
member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 31
dont know if this will help with your decision but you should look into air ride technologies (they say it has a combination of comfortable ride quality and serious cornering power) im looking to buy a complete air ride system from them soon.
if you want to look it up this is the site www.ridetech.com.
olds1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 12:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Olds64
Landyacht Club President
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lawton, OK
Posts: 1,811
I have heard of Air Ride. They are highly recommended on the Impala SS forum I have been posting on recently.

Jolly Green, you will have to decide how much money to spend. Replacing the stamped steel control arms on a 60s or 70s muscle car seems illogical to me. I guess if you are converting over to 4 wheel disc brakes and new control arms are included in the kit then all the better. However, only you can decide what you really want to spend your money on. Aren't there ways to convert to disc brakes without replacing the existing suspension components?
__________________
"Some men are Baptists, others Catholics. My father was an OLDSMOBILE man." Ralphie Billingsley A Christmas Story 1983
"We rei-eign, supreme, ooooh god! Burrito supreme, and a chicken supreme, and a CUTLASS SUPREME!" Tenacious D 2007
Olds64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 12:46 PM   #11 (permalink)
Jolly Green
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
There are kits to upgrade to disc brakes without changing the suspension. Just wondering if its worthwhile to upgrade suspension pieces in addition to the disc brakes.
Jolly Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 02:16 PM   #12 (permalink)
olds1968
member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: charlotte, nc
Posts: 31
we can only give suggestions but your the one the makes the final decision. like olds64 said it all depends on what you want and how much your willing to spend.
olds1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 03:07 PM   #13 (permalink)
Jolly Green
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 123
I appreciate all the suggestions, I really do. I was just hoping for something more definite, haha. From what I'm seeing, I believe most of the people on this forum do not believe a tubular suspension is worth it for my application. So I will probably stick with the bushing and ball joint replacement and buy the disc conversion kit for the front and rear. I figure that will give me alot of experience for future more in-depth projects but still make the car a fun ride. If I wish to go further in the future, it'll be available. what ya think? Yay or nay?

Oh and one more thing. For just simple dragway fun and for a good hookup on launches on the street, would you think a Hotchkis TVS for the rear end would be worth it? Boxed four link that's adjustable instead of the three-sides.
Jolly Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2008, 05:31 PM   #14 (permalink)
joe_padavano
Moderator
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jolly Green View Post
Oh and one more thing. For just simple dragway fun and for a good hookup on launches on the street, would you think a Hotchkis TVS for the rear end would be worth it? Boxed four link that's adjustable instead of the three-sides.
The stiffer rear arms will help repeatability during launch. The adjustable upper arms can help dial in the suspension. I'd also consider the upper arm relocation brackets that attach to the axle center section.
__________________
Joe Padavano

64 Jetstar 88 Conv
66 442 L-69 Conv
68 W-30
69 H/O
69 442
70 W-30
72 442
84 Custom Cruiser
86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds)
joe_padavano is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Front end suspension help nohn Chassis/Body/Frame 5 05-20-2007 12:33 PM
Hotchkis Tubular upper A-arms for GM A and G bodies 68fastwilliams 442 0 05-07-2007 07:08 AM
Hotchkis Tubular upper A-arms for GM A and G bodies - $500 68fastwilliams 442 0 04-30-2007 11:33 AM
suspension interchange mattnsac Chassis/Body/Frame 1 03-26-2007 06:15 PM
Jetstar 88 Suspension ? Jetstarjockey Chassis/Body/Frame 1 05-18-2006 01:40 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0
All content Copyright © 2008 by Internet Brands, Inc.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34