05-14-2008, 05:59 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Mass rebuilders, or by individuals who did not substitute parts at random?
Early carbs are no different, in operation, than than late ones and the repair/rebuilding process is the same.
I agree with that - I just haven't had any luck with this carb for some reason.
Am I seeing the same "sour grapes" that feeds the "Q-Jet/Holley/Carter/Edelbrock is junk" mentality?
Not at all - I had a Q-Jet on my 64 Chevy pickup (454) that worked great and I had an Edelbrock on several other cars that performed equally as well. The Edelbrock seems to bolt right on and I like how easy hey are to tune.
To do his part to combat "greenhouse gases" and make Algore happy.
Al Gore can kiss my happy a**. I am just trying to eliminate the blow-by tube and the associated fumes. Politically, I'm a closet anarchist. I don't like either party. But that's a discussion for other forums...I just want to add an Edelbrock.
It also eliminates the oil dripping associated with the original evacuation system. That too!
Norm
|
|
|
|