View Single Post
Old 05-10-2008, 06:20 AM   #24 (permalink)
Rallye469
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
Well, the above is just what I asked for...
Quote:
And disagreements lead to discussions, which (in theory) lead to the dissemination of factual information.
Exactly.
I 'read into' his desire for a more aggressive idle as more
then just an aggressive idle. I thought it was the desire to just step
it up over stock in both sound and performance but err on the side
of drivability over all out speed.

Maybe I read into it wrong.
So Norm, you're saying this will fill the bill perfectly...when
it comes to him choosing a cam for the sound it provides...?
OK.
But I still think without proper gearing and converter he won't be happy
driving around with this cam installed.

As far as:
Quote:
Not even close. .584” was not ideal, but it was not a problem.
I believe someone else, on this board, has gone higher.
Some one achieved this without any shimming or spring perch modification?
With stock rockers and bridge and springs?
Wow.
None for me thanks.
__________________
'70 Rallye 350
'65 F-85
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCw-JmwNGZQ
Rallye469 is offline   Reply With Quote