Has anybody used a 350 DX block?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #41  
raadon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Oldsguy
He disagreed with you, he didn't call you a liar. Three possibilities, you are right, he is right, or based upon circumstances and experiences both of you made correct statements to the best of your knowledge and there is a disagreement. No name calling or proof is required, let the statements stand.
He is a member of ROP, he could have started that thread I did, and then avoiding sticking his foot in his mouth. I didn't offer the block to him.



"If I was selling a "bushed DX" block, I would describe it accurately in my opening post, in order to justify the price."

He accused me of not describing the item accurately, that is calling me a liar. You can put Bill O'reilly spin on it but that is what it is. He said he acknowledges his mistakes and admits it....where has he done so. No need to reply...I found my stainless trim and I won't be back.
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 02:05 PM
  #42  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
I was looking at that block at mondello. It already has the crank and pistons.

Since people seem to be just posting crap without reading, I race my Delta with the 350 in it. I'm looking to rebuild the block and get in the area of 400 HP, which isn't outta the question.

I want the car to run in the high 12's Don't wanna go faster than 11.49 becasue I do want to put a cage in it
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 05:41 PM
  #43  
Dapapadon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 490
From: Gladstone, OR
Redog, I did read what you wrote & you used the "cheap" word. I still don't think you'll be able to...
Originally Posted by Redog
Can I just take the long blcok and put on the heads and manifold and go. I know that the head bolts need to be 9/16" or drill out the older heads to 9/16" bolts holes. I would also be putting in the Edelbrock 7112 cam to match my current manifold
... get 400 HP and go racing, cheap, in the 12's.

But hey, go for it. Tell us what it cost. And how fast (ET) you actually went.

Don
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 05:58 PM
  #44  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by Oldsguy
The last two posts are examples of factual, informative, and objective statements without name-calling or flaming. Let's keep it that way gentlemen.
Thanks.

Norm
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 06:13 PM
  #45  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by raadon
When Greg said 1st gen. hp block he is talking about ........
Non-production blocks, that had nothing to do with this topic.

Norm
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 06:57 PM
  #46  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Originally Posted by raadon
........ I have a DX block with .842 lifters ........
........ Did anyone say anything different? ........
Norm.
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 07:34 PM
  #47  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by raadon
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
........ If I was selling a "bushed DX" block, I would describe it accurately in my opening post, in order to justify the price ........
He accused me of not describing the item accurately ........
No one has "accused" anyone, of anything.

Originally Posted by raadon
........ I didn't offer the block to him ........
No one said you did. Here it is, again:

Originally Posted by On ROP, by 88 Coupe
Originally Posted by raadon
I have the same block will sell for 500.00 350DX .842 lifters new
I recently saw one of these blocks for sale, for $500 ........
Hopefully, this will end the BS.

Norm
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #48  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by Dapapadon
Redog, I did read what you wrote & you used the "cheap" word. I still don't think you'll be able to...

... get 400 HP and go racing, cheap, in the 12's.

But hey, go for it. Tell us what it cost. And how fast (ET) you actually went.

Don
I plan to spend between 5 to 7 grand, that in my book is cheap and probably in the area that I will spend
Old Aug 1, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #49  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by Redog
........ It already has the crank and pistons ........
Which makes it a "short block" minus cam and lifters.

http://www.mondellotwister.com/EngineBlock.htm has it labeled (incorrectly) as a "block". Considering the company's reputation, I am inclined to believe it is a "marketing ploy". Possibly to take advantage of an Olds "newcomer".

Or, it might be a simple "typo".

Originally Posted by Redog
........ looking to rebuild the block and get in the area of 400 HP ........
Piece of cake. Any competent machine shop can handle it.

Originally Posted by Redog
........don't want to put a cage in it
Cage is required for 9.99 and quicker (or 135 MPH and faster)

A simple, 5 point roll bar is all that's needed, from 9.99 to 11.49



The limit was 11.99, last time my Coupes were out. If it had been 11.49, that is what they would have done.

Norm
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 12:51 AM
  #50  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
Redog, you should put a roll bar in it anyway.
The roofs on these cars are marshmallows. Set a case of beer on the top of em and they'll cave.
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #51  
Redog's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Which makes it a "short block" minus cam and lifters.

http://www.mondellotwister.com/EngineBlock.htm has it labeled (incorrectly) as a "block". Considering the company's reputation, I am inclined to believe it is a "marketing ploy". Possibly to take advantage of an Olds "newcomer".

Or, it might be a simple "typo".

Well it doesn't matter anyway. Probably would be the same to machine my current block as it would be to buy that one and have it shipped across the conurty. I've haven't been buying too much from them anyway. $15 for a intake gasket but $18 to ship. It doesn't even weigh a pound

Redog, you should put a roll bar in it anyway.
The roofs on these cars are marshmallows. Set a case of beer on the top of em and they'll cave.
Really, maybe I should consider it
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 07:29 AM
  #52  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Down here in Fl the rollbar requirement is 11.49, supposedly due to the number of production cars (Vipers, Vettes, etc) in the 11s.

Like Norm stated, 400 hp is easy enough, no need to get crazy. An early 350 block and heads will do it. A teeny bit more difficult if you want to run pump gas. Either way, if you can assemble it, there is no need to spend more than $4000

Speed Pro pistons pressed onto reworked rods $600
Camshaft, lifters, and springs $400
Grind crank $200
Oil pump and timing set $200
Quality bearings and rings, gasket set, freeze plugs, etc $400
Machine work, hot tank, bore, hone, new cam bearings, balance $700
#5-#7a heads ported for low lift flow, large intake valves, new liners and hardened seats (if needed) $1200-$1500.

These prices are all on the high end, too. Do some scrounging and horse trading and you can come in under that.
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #53  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,840
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Non-production blocks, that had nothing to do with this topic.

Norm
I have to agree with Norm here. I was confused since I thought the discussion was about production diesel blocks, all of which came with 3" mains.
Old Aug 2, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #54  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Since you brought it back up:

Originally Posted by joe_padavano
........ the discussion was about production diesel blocks ........
It was. If the Troll had been clear, at the outset, about the difference, he would not have been able to trash (as was his intent) this thread.

I checked my original source. In this case, Olds didn't start the "back door" operations until after the "D" casting was history. Since the "DX" casting was all they had, it is what they used.

After 30+ years, my source is still accurate. In this case, it disagreed with my memory.

Norm
Old Aug 10, 2008 | 04:22 PM
  #55  
380 Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,130
From: Iowa
My DX has .921 lifters and 3" mains. Used spacers and billet main caps to reduce to 2.5". I have seen a D block with .842 lifters. Saw one DX with .842s (wasn't for sale). Greg Godon (Greg's Performance) has some blocks he bought from WJ with .842s but also have 2.75" mains along with DX cast in them. They also have a siameze (sp?) bore. They were considered production for WJ to use them. The factory did some inconsistant and very strange sheet back then.

Nick
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 07:47 AM
  #56  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,840
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 380 Racer
My DX has .921 lifters and 3" mains. Used spacers and billet main caps to reduce to 2.5". I have seen a D block with .842 lifters. Saw one DX with .842s (wasn't for sale). Greg Godon (Greg's Performance) has some blocks he bought from WJ with .842s but also have 2.75" mains along with DX cast in them. They also have a siameze (sp?) bore. They were considered production for WJ to use them. The factory did some inconsistant and very strange sheet back then.

Nick
"Considered production" is very different from a block that originally WAS a diesel engine in a production car available on the showroom floor. The discussion, I thought, was about the latter, not back door "production" blocks used for racing.
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 08:22 AM
  #57  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
WJ raced in Pro Stock.

NHRA didn't care what the original application was, as long as it had an Olds Part number, and could be purchased by anyone. Production diesel blocks fit into the rules perfectly, and factory support, included custom machine work for those competitors with “special needs”.

NASCAR had less restrictive rules, that allowed Batten heads with the matching Edelbrock intake. Siamese cylinders, and modified castings, would have been included in the exceptions.

Norm
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #58  
Jokers69's Avatar
Senior Moment
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 260
Originally Posted by J-(Chicago)
Redog, you should put a roll bar in it anyway.
why, just because you say he should? do you own a rollbar company?

Originally Posted by J-(Chicago)
The roofs on these cars are marshmallows.
No they are not, they are made of sheet metal, oldsmobile never made a production car with the roof constructed of a sweet treat made from sugar.

Originally Posted by J-(Chicago)
Set a case of beer on the top of em and they'll cave.
Again something that is so vague only a BS artist would post this. In my experience only a case of Fosters oilcans carry enough weight to cave in a room made of marshmallows, oldsmobile never made roofs out of marshmallows therefor a case of beer cannot cave one in.

ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!

Last edited by Jokers69; Aug 11, 2008 at 10:00 AM. Reason: cause I'm so brilliant I can't spell..
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #59  
z11375ss's Avatar
Senior Moment Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,240
Joker, are you posting like a certain unnamed person on this board to make fun? If so, your doing a perfect imitation of him. PM me what rotflmfao means will ya? I don't know what that means but am certain it can't printed on the board. Oh yeah, and Jeremy is a friend of mine. I'm sure he knows the stress limitations on his Olds (as far as beer goes), and yes, he does own his own roll bar co.

Last edited by z11375ss; Aug 11, 2008 at 03:31 PM. Reason: spelling too.
Old Aug 11, 2008 | 04:16 PM
  #60  
380 Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,130
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
"Considered production" is very different from a block that originally WAS a diesel engine in a production car available on the showroom floor. The discussion, I thought, was about the latter, not back door "production" blocks used for racing.
I'm sorry, I saw the title and read "Has anybody used a 350 DX block?" I stated I have one and have seen versions of said D & DXs. Not sure who brought up the production requirement. Warren told Greg they were diesel blocks that Oldsmobile provided him. The blocks Warren had left all had DX cast in them. All the blocks that were provided drag racers and the NASCAR teams were enough to consider them production, I would venture to say.

Nick
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 08:00 AM
  #61  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,840
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 380 Racer
I'm sorry, I saw the title and read "Has anybody used a 350 DX block?" I stated I have one and have seen versions of said D & DXs. Not sure who brought up the production requirement. Warren told Greg they were diesel blocks that Oldsmobile provided him. The blocks Warren had left all had DX cast in them. All the blocks that were provided drag racers and the NASCAR teams were enough to consider them production, I would venture to say.

Nick
The DRCE is by no means a "production" block and it is readily accepted by NHRA. Same thing with the Olds "rocket block", which is an SBC. The generally accepted definition of "production" is hardware that was available on the showroom floor. On the other hand, as I re-read the thread, it's not clear that the intent was only to cover blocks used as production diesel engines.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 08:55 AM
  #62  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Smile

"On the other hand, as I re-read the thread, it's not clear that the intent was only to cover blocks used as production diesel engines."

That's where I kinda got lost, I saw no reference to production only blocks. In fact, in raadon's second post, he stated this,

"yup, the one mondello has should be small lifter too, or it is just a regular production block."

acknowledging that his was not a normal production block. However, I think it has been shown that there are blocks out there with "DX" stamped on them with several different lifter and main sizes, so look closely, you may get lucky and run across a rare piece.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 09:25 AM
  #63  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
it's not clear that the intent was only to cover blocks used as production diesel engines.
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums/38995-post4.html

Originally Posted by Redog
........ I was just looking for a different or cheaper route since Mondello has a new 350 DX block for $1500.
http://www.mondellotwister.com/EngineBlock.htm

Originally Posted by Mondellotwister
350 Diesel Block
New (not reconditioned) 7582 GM 5.7L 350 Diesel Short Block complete with pistons, rings and crankshaft (no camshaft) ........ $1499.00
I see no reason to think he was asking about anything but a production DX.

Norm
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:06 AM
  #64  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by captjim
........ I saw no reference to production only blocks. In fact, in raadon's second post, he stated this,

Originally Posted by raadon
yup, the one mondello has should be small lifter too, or it is just a regular production block.
Not just a little vague?

Originally Posted by 88 coupe
........ "DX" castings ('81 and newer) used .921" roller lifters, as opposed to the "D" castings ('80 and earlier) that used .842" flat tappets.

Is yours an exception? ........
Don't you think a simple yes, or no, would have ended it?

Originally Posted by captjim
........ with "DX" stamped on them ........
Not "stamped".

"350 D" and "350 DX" are an integral part of the castings. The addition of the "X" was to identify it as an '81-newer block, and was the only difference between them.

Norm
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 10:53 AM
  #65  
380 Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,130
From: Iowa
Both the DRCE and Rocket Block were designed and produced by Oldsmobile for specific applications. Much more beneficial to use Chevy style internals since there are many more aftermarket parts available. I have some Chevy style parts in my engine. I still consider it an Oldsmobile tho. In fact the only things left on my engine that were Olds production pieces are the block and crank.

Norm the D had shorter drilled and tapped main bolt holes than the DX.......or so I have been told.
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 11:43 AM
  #66  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by 380 Racer
........ D had shorter drilled and tapped main bolt holes than the DX ........
As I understand it, the deeper holes were an engineering order, in response to a main bearing problem in the first "D" engines. Subsequent "D" blocks were drilled/tapped to the same depth as the later "DX" castings.

Norm
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 12:27 PM
  #67  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
"Looks like .842 lifters to me. They made a few of them. Greg Godon got a few of them from Warren Johnson a couple of years ago. A couple others on ROP had them. I bought this one I have in '95 for $250...so I'd sell it for $500."

His next post, seems pretty clear to me that he was describing a pretty rare and unusual casting.


Quote:
Originally Posted by captjim
........ with "DX" stamped on them ........

Not "stamped".

"350 D" and "350 DX" are an integral part of the castings. The addition of the "X" was to identify it as an '81-newer block, and was the only difference between them.

Norm

That is some funny shyt right there, made me laugh right out loud. I pictured some stocky old lady walking down the line with a die and a big old mallet smacking "DX" into each block. hysterical. Only MIke (oldsman455) over at ROP does that, but you are now my new main man!
Old Aug 12, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #68  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by captjim
Originally Posted by raadon
Looks like .842 lifters to me ........
As I said, they are .921" lifters,

Originally Posted by Mondellotwister
350 Diesel Block
New (not reconditioned) 7582 GM 5.7L 350 Diesel Short Block complete with pistons, rings and crankshaft (no camshaft) ........ $1499.00
in a production DX block.

This told me:
      Originally Posted by 88 coupe
      Not just a little vague?
      Originally Posted by 88 coupe
      ........ "DX" castings ('81 and newer) used .921" roller lifters, as opposed to the "D" castings ('80 and earlier) that used .842" flat tappets.

      Is yours an exception?
      Don't you think a simple yes, or no, would have ended it?
      If you cannot answer the question, just say so.

      Originally Posted by captjim
      ....... seems pretty clear to me that he was describing a pretty rare and unusual casting .........
      So "rare and unusual" that he would sell it for $500?

      Originally Posted by captjim
      ........ That is some funny shyt right there, made me laugh right out loud. I pictured some stocky old lady walking down the line with a die and a big old mallet smacking "DX" into each block. hysterical. Only MIke (oldsman455) over at ROP does that, but you are now my new main man!
      Having a little trouble keeping up with the rest of us?

      Norm
      Old Aug 12, 2008 | 05:39 PM
        #69  
      z11375ss's Avatar
      Senior Moment Member
       
      Joined: Jan 2007
      Posts: 3,240
      Throw the f***in' towel in, somebody!
      Old Aug 12, 2008 | 06:31 PM
        #70  
      captjim's Avatar
      Registered User
       
      Joined: Aug 2007
      Posts: 2,250
      Originally Posted by 88 coupe
      It is.


      It doesn't have to:
      • It is a "DX" = they were bushed.
      • It is a "DX" = Spacers were used to make the 2½" crank fit into the 3" bore.
      Norm
      Throw in what towel? We are just BSing. How come when Norm stated the above, which is completely inaccurate (Art has a DX with .842 lifters and 2.5" mains without spacers) we are suddenly discussing "production blocks"? Sounds like Norm's comments were absolute to me. No room for any other option. Yet, there are "DX" blocks with .842s and 2.5" mains.

      "Having a little trouble keeping up with the rest of us?"

      Nope, I just found that extremely amusing and thanked you for it.

      Last edited by captjim; Aug 12, 2008 at 06:32 PM. Reason: punctuation
      Old Aug 13, 2008 | 03:41 AM
        #71  
      z11375ss's Avatar
      Senior Moment Member
       
      Joined: Jan 2007
      Posts: 3,240
      k
      Old Aug 13, 2008 | 08:08 AM
        #72  
      88 coupe's Avatar
      Junior Member
       
      Joined: Oct 2004
      Posts: 2,212
      From: Southern CA
      Originally Posted by captjim
      ........ We are just BSing ........
      Correction. You are the only one who is "just BSing".

      You are "just BSing" because it is what you do when you cannot hold up your end of a discussion.

      Here is is, again:

      Originally Posted by 88 coupe
      Originally Posted by 88 coupe
      ........ "DX" castings ('81 and newer) used .921" roller lifters, as opposed to the "D" castings ('80 and earlier) that used .842" flat tappets.

      Is yours an exception? ........
      Don't you think a simple yes, or no, would have ended it?
      Originally Posted by 88 coupe
      ........ If you cannot answer the question, just say so ........
      Norm
      Old Aug 14, 2008 | 07:38 PM
        #73  
      380 Racer's Avatar
      Registered User
       
      Joined: Aug 2008
      Posts: 1,130
      From: Iowa
      Related Topics
      Thread
      Thread Starter
      Forum
      Replies
      Last Post
      Solid Lifters
      General Discussion
      7
      Aug 3, 2013 08:36 PM
      bulletproof
      General Discussion
      0
      Mar 16, 2012 01:38 PM
      WoofWagon
      Paint
      2
      Oct 26, 2011 07:31 PM
      oldsdroptop
      General Discussion
      11
      Jun 2, 2009 07:03 PM
      Moto
      Chassis/Body/Frame
      5
      Aug 28, 2008 05:12 AM




      All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 PM.