|
|
|||||||
| Forums | Gallery | Encyclopedia | Tech | Olds Junction | Register | All Albums | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Used Cars |
|
|
|
| Welcome to Classic Oldsmobile Forum! |
|
|
Welcome to Classic Oldsmobile forum, You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to start new topics, reply to conversations, privately message other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Classic Oldsmobile Forum today! |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
October 29th, 2007, 01:14 PM
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15
|
w-350 Intake or Edelbrock Intake
I have an original w-350 intake and quadrajet and an edelbrock intake/carb combo. In everyones opinion which one will give more power. I was thinking about selling the w-350 intake/carb and just using the edelbrock stuff becuase im really not a die-hard olds fan. I just want my 71 to be a nice driving car. any info is appreciated.
thanks |
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
Register your account for free today or log in if already registered to remove this ad! |
|
October 29th, 2007, 01:19 PM
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Hot Rodder at heart Administrator
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lees Summit MO
Posts: 5,360
|
I think you would be happier with the stock set-up as long as you have the carburetor tune correctly. Welcome to our site.
__________________
Dan '77 Cutlass Supreme '46 2 door "The rocket 455.....it's a sledgehammer approach to a thumbtack world" LuxBlue of HAMB. |
|
|
|
|
October 29th, 2007, 05:12 PM
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,396
|
Quote:
__________________
Joe Padavano 64 Jetstar 88 Conv 66 442 L-69 Conv 68 W-30 69 H/O 69 442 70 W-30 72 442 84 Custom Cruiser 86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds) |
|
|
|
|
|
October 31st, 2007, 04:35 PM
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Seasoned beater pilot.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,696
|
Yeah, what the hell, I'd ditch it if you don't care bout it. I'm sure 39 years of technological advancement since then will have your back covered on this one.
 I like both, and I'm sure it will be a good running/driving car either way. Just depends on how big of a hole that 500 bucks is burning in your pocket. I'd blow it on the chassis, with a nice sway bar kit or new shocks/springs personally though.
__________________
 I'd rather have a numbers matching poker hand.
|
|
|
|
|
October 31st, 2007, 05:35 PM
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,396
|
Quote:
__________________
Joe Padavano 64 Jetstar 88 Conv 66 442 L-69 Conv 68 W-30 69 H/O 69 442 70 W-30 72 442 84 Custom Cruiser 86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 455 edelbrock performer intake manifold | blue72regency | Parts Wanted | 1 | October 27th, 2007 10:47 PM |
| 307 Intake on my 71 350? | Sturgeon | Small Blocks | 5 | October 8th, 2007 08:29 AM |
| Intake combo for 350 | Chumley | Cutlass | 1 | May 24th, 2007 10:39 AM |
| Divorced choke with Edelbrock intake | mitsudave | Small Blocks | 1 | February 26th, 2007 01:30 AM |
Linear Mode
