2.25" exhaust limitations?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30, 2007 | 01:29 PM
  #1  
GoldOlds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 117
From: Chatham-Kent, Ontario
2.25" exhaust limitations?

My '69 Cutlass has dual 2.25" exhaust that was installed less than a year ago. It was nicely done, all mandrel bending, no compression bends, with 40 series Flowmasters. I'd like more grunt under the hood than my mostly stock 350 rocket has. How much cam, compression, carb, hp, torque, etc. can an engine have and still breathe effectively through 2.25" exhaust? The factory manifolds will be replaced by headers, although I haven't picked any specific make/series yet. I'm still toying with the idea of plopping in a 455, but I'm not sure an engine that big can breathe through 2.25" with hardly any mods.
Thanks,

- GoldOlds
Old May 31, 2007 | 01:49 AM
  #2  
Huron's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by GoldOlds
How much cam, compression, carb, hp, torque, etc. can an engine have and still breathe effectively through 2.25" exhaust? Thanks,

- GoldOlds
Hello GoldOlds,

I'd say that you could run a pretty healthy small block with 2.25" exhaust. It should be able to support an engine putting out 350+ horsepower. Most street small blocks are somewhat below that. If you have headers, 3.55:1 or more rear gear, 10:1 compression ratio, reworked heads, and a cam with more than 216 degrees duration @ .050" lift, then that is where I would start looking into backpressure issues. In summary though, 2.25" exhaust is probably more than enough for most street small blocks.

Huron
Old May 31, 2007 | 08:35 AM
  #3  
Pinner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 13
Your 2.25" exhaust will be just fine. Even for a big block motor. I'm finishing up a build on a 350 in my 85 Cutlass, 10.25:1,cam, head work, headers, 2.25" dual exhaust. If your interested I'll let you know how it runs.
Old May 31, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #4  
GoldOlds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 117
From: Chatham-Kent, Ontario
Thanks, guys! That's just the sort of info I'm looking for. If I stick with the 350 route, I'll probably go with the Performer RPM, a cam similar to the .050" duration numbers Huron mentioned and some mild head work (porting to accomodate the 1.995/1.6?? valves). Compression won't likely exceed 9.5:1. My gear ratio is 3.73:1. I'm not sure exactly what I'll do for a carb; maybe have the Q-jet rebuilt. Maybe get the 670 Street Avenger I've been considering. The bottom line is I'd like to get the Cutlass into the 13s and at the same time have a VERY street friendly car. Pinner - yes, I'd DEFINITELY like to know how your combo turns out.

- GoldOlds
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MDchanic
Wheels and Tires
22
Aug 4, 2011 10:23 AM
Joffroi
Site Suggestions
13
Jul 9, 2010 06:53 AM
Mikes65
Cutlass
6
Dec 6, 2009 08:00 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:50 AM.