Real 1969 H/O or clone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #1  
442much's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,623
From: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Real 1969 H/O or clone?

I'm leaning on the side of clone. Can anyone be sure?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1969-...item4aa1881151
Old May 29, 2010 | 01:58 PM
  #2  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,073
From: Atlanta, Georgia
According to Rob's site, it's the real banana

http://members.***.net/witrob/registry/registry.html
Old May 29, 2010 | 02:54 PM
  #3  
mmurphy77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,079
From: Raleigh, NC
That's the 'Holy Grail' right there!
Old May 29, 2010 | 04:41 PM
  #4  
2blu442's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 527
If you like 1968's here's one of those too. Anybody got $70,000 to spare?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Oldsm...item20b0e5dccb
Old May 29, 2010 | 08:30 PM
  #5  
442much's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,623
From: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Why does he call it a Cutlass, and why is the VIN not 344...? I've heard some 442's in 68-69 started with 334 but not too sure.
Old May 29, 2010 | 08:59 PM
  #6  
mmurphy77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,079
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by 442much
Why does he call it a Cutlass, and why is the VIN not 344...? I've heard some 442's in 68-69 started with 334 but not too sure.
I thought because the H/Os were not 442s they were based on Cutlasses.
Old May 29, 2010 | 09:11 PM
  #7  
442much's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,623
From: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Originally Posted by mmurphy77
I thought because the H/Os were not 442s they were based on Cutlasses.
I think (not 100%) that the H/O was based on the 442 in 68-69. Besides in reality all the Olds A bodies were based on the Cutlass. The only way to tell a 69 Cutlass from a 442 or HO is the VIN (not always apparently) and the paint scheme and badging. As far as I can tell, I don't think you can just walk up to one and know for sure.
Old May 30, 2010 | 02:23 AM
  #8  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,073
From: Atlanta, Georgia
That's the last not the first numbers in his vin.

The first numbers would be 344879M [Lansing built 69 442]

The 69 H/O was based on the 442 but as far as the 69 Fisher body tags a Cutlass and a 442 are the same. Becuase the bodies are the same.
Old May 30, 2010 | 09:56 AM
  #9  
442much's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,623
From: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Originally Posted by Jamesbo
That's the last not the first numbers in his vin.

The first numbers would be 344879M [Lansing built 69 442]

The 69 H/O was based on the 442 but as far as the 69 Fisher body tags a Cutlass and a 442 are the same. Becuase the bodies are the same.
You're right. I looked again. The VIN listed is the production no. It sure is a beautiful car.
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 06:51 AM
  #10  
1969Hurst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 740
From: Orland Park, IL
Nice car... looks like the owner found a sticker/tag package seeing that under the hood is festooned with them .. may be a little too over-done seeing that the entire underneath of the car is Cameo White with a gloss black driveshaft? Also like the rainbow of colors on the front suspension
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 08:32 AM
  #11  
1969Hurst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 740
From: Orland Park, IL
On second though, guess I shouldn't criticize too much, someone took the time to make it a really clean car...

Originally Posted by 1969Hurst
Nice car... looks like the owner found a sticker/tag package seeing that under the hood is festooned with them .. may be a little too over-done seeing that the entire underneath of the car is Cameo White with a gloss black driveshaft? Also like the rainbow of colors on the front suspension
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 08:59 AM
  #12  
stevengerard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,534
From: Chi-town
definitely a nice looking car - I'd be afraid to drive it.
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
mmurphy77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,079
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by stevengerard
definitely a nice looking car - I'd be afraid to drive it.
I agree! The paint on the floorboards is nicer than on some cars I've had!
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 11:33 AM
  #14  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 18,073
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by stevengerard
definitely a nice looking car - I'd be afraid to drive it.

That's part of the problem with these. It's hard for me to keep mine at the level I want to keep it. It really takes alot of the fun out of it IMHO.
Old Jun 1, 2010 | 03:42 PM
  #15  
stevengerard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,534
From: Chi-town
Originally Posted by Jamesbo
That's part of the problem with these. It's hard for me to keep mine at the level I want to keep it. It really takes alot of the fun out of it IMHO.

yep I'm right there with you and the way the shop is going on my car even if its not perfect the money I spent on it will make me cry the first time it gets scratched. But then again - we bought it to drive it. My wife told me the other day about about my other car "if you are not going to drive it why bother having it, then sell it" I thought about it for two seconds and realized she is right. Some folks can own dozens of cars and rarely drive them but not only do I not have that kind of money it wouldn't feel right just letting something sit when i know me or someone else could be enjoying it even more. The reason I like cars with higher miles or ones that are refurbished is because I don't have to worry about driving it around the block will reduce the value of it - that would drive me crazy
Old Jun 2, 2010 | 08:35 PM
  #16  
442much's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,623
From: Sherwood Park, Alberta
I had a chance to buy one about 20 years ago. I though that it needed a better stereo system and a few other neat things. Then I thought, "you can't do that, it's a '69 Hurst. It has to remain stock." After a while, I thought - $18,000 and I have to listen to an AM radio?" I let it go. I still love them, I was just not the kind of owner it needed. My '76 has the MP3 player in the glove compartment, a CB radio, PA system OAI hood.....plusI've driven it across Canada and the US three times each. Cross country driving is so great! If my car is ever seen on a trailer, call the cops, 'cause someone's stealing it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldsmobiledave
Cars For Sale
42
Feb 26, 2015 07:20 PM
txrob779
Cutlass
83
Feb 10, 2014 04:49 PM
crzyjef
General Discussion
16
Jan 25, 2012 12:48 PM
NightStalker
Cars For Sale
12
Jul 7, 2011 11:21 AM
NightStalker
Cars For Sale
0
Jun 27, 2011 02:10 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:28 AM.