![]() |
|
|||||||
| Forums | Gallery | Encyclopedia | Tech | Olds Junction | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Olds heads ranking & cams
There's a ton of different heads out there for Olds 455s, and even more info on them. Can anyone help me with rank-ordering the Olds heads from best to worse (eg, D is best, then C, then F, then E, then J, then L, etc), and tell me if the best are really that much better than later heads, like say the "J" if a good port/polish is done on them? How much of a net horsepower difference will there be between the best and the worst? Also what about a set of aftermarket heads, like Dart or Edelbrock?
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
Buy a new set of edelbrocks and be done with it.
I'll take a crack at it. Large valves. Get heads with the large 2.07 valves -OR- be prepared to put them in. Heads with large valves... Some B,C,E,G,Ga,K & Ka All D,F,H (good luck nabbing these!) With enough work...they CAN all flow the same. But I'd start with(in this order) C's,E's,Ga's,G's,K/Ka's and then..............................J's. (B's are good too but you get into the whole wrong angle headache) Please correct me somebody if I goofed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Yeah the Edelbrocks are a thought, and yet, their quality has gone downhill of late and even they need port work nowadays. If I'm going to do portwork, I'd rather stay original Olds, unless the Edelbrocks are that much better.
So what's the HP diff between the J's (at the bottom) versus the D, F, or H (at the top)? Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Seasoned beater pilot.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,650
|
How FAST do you want to go??
You can run 10s with these. http://www.rocketracingperformance.c...eads/index.htm
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
There's a few guys in the 9's with these heads now. And I guarantee someone will crack low 8's with them this season. http://homepage.mac.com/ph12/.Pictur...ts/fender1.jpg Last edited by Rallye469 : 03-27-2008 at 12:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Those are pretty sweet. Any idea how much they are?
But again, I come back to my original question: how much better is a "Best" Olds head versus a "Worst" ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
They're about $2500 and come with a designated manifold.
As to stock heads...what do you want to do? I can't tell you about J heads because I've never run them. I can tell you with the exhaust ports ground down, large valves and port work, they're as good as anything probably. I've seen J heads go 10's. I can tell you about stock C's though... '67 425 2.07 valves(stock large valves) 226/230 Duration .496/.512 lift cam performer w/ 750 Vac. Holley 1 5/8 headers, 2.5" flowmaster system to the rear bumber 3.42 gears in a 3895 lb. '70 Post coupe. 13.05@102.6 That's not bad for stock heads and a small cam and mild gears. It pulled 1.72 60fts on radials. (and I swear, the car leaned out at the tall end...with a better tune, it would've been 12.8 no sweat) So how fast do you wanna go? |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Not bad at all! It's sounding like a set of C's might be the way to go... with a little porting work.
As far as how fast I wanta go, I'd say mid 11s, which should make for a fairly streetable combo. I'm not far off that now, but as I want to take it to the next step, heads are going to have to be it. Still wish I could quantify this a bit better. I have J heads now but they've been P&P so they flow fairly well. Don't know exactly HOW well as I didn't build the engine myself, or spec it out... I bought it pre-built. If I slap a set of C's on there I was hoping to see a dramatic improvement.Anyway, thanks! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
Mid 11's is a stout goal...IMHO. What are you running now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Seasoned beater pilot.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,650
|
Especially a streetable mid 11 car. It'd be annoying to run power anything.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Dunno... have not yet had it to the strip. Soon as I can I plan to use my GTech Pro to at least get an idea of how it's running now. I'd guess mid-high 12s, but then my butt-dyno's been wrong before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
You got that right!You can usually kiss power brakes goodbye unless you run a hyroboost system off your PS pump. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
So the problem is low manifold vacuum then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
Yeah...
The problem with big cams is big duration = low vacuum. To run 11's you'll have to be right around 380hp to the wheels. That's about 460-480 at the fly wheel. You'll need lift, duration and heads that will use all of it. They'll probably need to flow 270cfm @ .500 , 290 @ .600 These are really general #'s. But I bet they're close. If anyone has flow #'s with timeslips PLEASE chime in... (I switched to manual brakes...and I really don't mind as much as I thought I would...you can stop just as quick, you just get bigger calf muscles!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
And yeah, I'd love to have flow numbers with timeslips, or was hoping I'd find someone who had run X time with one type of manifold, but then had switched manifolds and run Y time, thereby allowing a rough comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 91
|
You will also need a 3.73 gear, 3500 converter, and I did not catch your compression & cam.
The J heads will do it. A/B/C heads have a shorter floor, and bowl on the longside. The later heads have a taller bowl, and shortturn radius (and actually will flow a little bit less). You have to get them side by side, and measure with a micrometer, to tell the diference. There is only about a 10hp (max) difference though. Lowering the floor gains a little bit more, but that is best left to a professional. Fill in the heat risers with aluminum for an easy 20hp. And better yet, get some larger intake valves. 2.07's are good, but 2.125 inatkes are better. This is where the bigger gains come in. Have your machinist cut 4 angles (30/45seat/60/75). A 30 degree seat will give you more low lift flow, at the expense of high lift (.500-up) flow. Works great on the street. Keep the 1.625 exhausts. Dart does not manufacture heads for Oldsmobile's. If you think your car run's 12's, it will be lucky to chase down a 13 sec e/t. Butt dyno is the worst. Followed by that computer thing. No comparison to a Chrondek. JME Jim in Phx. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 236
|
Quote:
Quote:
Based on my builds that have spanned the 11-15 second range. Weight would be about 3700 with driver. But what IS totally 100% accurate is this... Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 91
|
BTW, get some REEL sticky rubber for it, keep the spare tire in it (maybe even keep one that is full of water or concrete), ice down the intake, plastic carb spacer, 36 degrees total advance, and due to the unknown cam and headwork, check your et with shift points from 4400 rpm-5000 rpm.
It's funny how some people can sneak up on their number. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Ok so to continue this thread, I managed to pick up a set of well done C heads for the proverbial "song" - complete with larger valves, plugged heat riser, ported/polished, etc.
Now the next question is, what cam should I be looking at? Again, I have no idea what's in there now, and won't till I pull it out. But were I to replace it, does the peanut gallery here have any recommendations, keeping in mind I need to keep it streetable? Rallye469 above talked about a fairly mild cam with 226/230 Duration and .496/.512 lift. How much less mild could I go? I'm not opposed to using a vaccum booster if that's all that's lost, but in my experience, too hot a motor is like driving with an on/off switch: you're either going balls to the wall or you're sitting still. Can't abide that, but still want to run mid 11's to mid 12's at the highest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 315
|
Quit guessing and take it to the track. I wore out a guy whos g-tech computer thingy said mid 10's. My track proven 7.1's 1/8 mile (guess 11.0 1/4 but never verified) street car beat him by bus lenths.
See where you are then start making changes. No matter how much power you make its worthless if you can't get it to the ground. Work in tires chassis and suspension. Once you get it as fast as the current motor will go then start making upgrades to the power. |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Administrator & Motorhead
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 153
|
Quote:
Reason I'm going down this path now is that with the current engine and tires, on a good dry clean road, the car hooks pretty well (I spin maybe 25 feet but not badly) and launches well. That tells me the engine is down on power from where I want it to be, hence my discussion on the cam. Between now and when I can get to the track, I'm wanting to narrow down on cams - this is the research phase, especially since I now know I've gotta pull the engine partially apart eventually anyway to put those heads on. Might as well do the cam while I'm in there to best match the heads and where I want to be, ya know? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 315
|
Thats understandable but I would still see if you can dial in what you have. If you don't care about originality just buy bare Edelbrocks and invest in a good valve job. Buy the time you spend the money on building and professonally porting OEM castings you will have just as much tied up in them. You also get the weight savings as a bonus.
As you are thinking out your new combo think it all out. The entire comination working together will make a big difference. The last quick car I built was for a buddy. I spent I lot of time thinking out the combo and its more than supprised a few people in race cars at the track. On a shoe string budget 4200 lbs street truck 461 BBC oval port heads solid flat tappet cam with a ysi Vortech blower with 8lbs of non intercooled boost. As of a few months ago that truck has been 6.58 @108 in the 1/8 and its driven on the street all the time. Its all about the combo. Good luck |
|
|
|