View Single Post
Old 01-31-2008, 07:30 AM   #4 (permalink)
joe_padavano
Moderator
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 1,535
Quote:
Originally Posted by desert442 View Post
Okay, here goes... I have a question regarding tranny options for 6667 4-4-2's. Went to a car show last weekend, and was looking at some of the AZ Olds club ( of which I am a member of ) cars that were at the event, anyhow, I ran into a gentleman who claimed that Olds made a "Column Shift" 442, and that they're worth more than 4 speed equipped cars. So, we went back and forth a little and after a few minutes I realized that this guy was firmly holding to his belief of a column shift 4-4-2.

I think otherwise. Can some one please reconfirm this ???

Thanks..
Uh, maybe in the 1972-later period when the 442 was just an option package that might have been true, but for the 1964-1971 model years there was NEVER a column shift manual trans available in the 442. Depending on the year, the base 442 trans was either a 4spd on the floor or a 3spd on the floor.

The column shift automatic WAS a factory option, as this was the configuration that came when you ordered the optional AT. The floor shifter and console were an additional extra cost option. A bench seat was also optionally available instead of the standard buckets.

And once again, why oh why does everyone seem to think that "rare" equates to more valuable? Three-on-the-tree is rare because they were undesirable when new (it was the low-rent trans option) and few people bought them. They are no more desirable now., except from an perverse curiosity standpoint. Same thing goes for green interiors and Sport Coupes. Of course, "people" say a lot of things, most of it wrong.
__________________
Joe Padavano

64 Jetstar 88 Conv
66 442 L-69 Conv
68 W-30
69 H/O
69 442
70 W-30
72 442
84 Custom Cruiser
86 Caprice wagon (w/307 Olds)
joe_padavano is offline   Reply With Quote