Edelbrock Intake Manifold - 350 Olds 5.7L

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:21 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tgilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Stratford, New Jersey
Posts: 337
Edelbrock Intake Manifold - 350 Olds 5.7L

Looking for some guidance from anyone who's used Edelbrock Performer manifold with a Q-Jet.

I'm keeping my Q-Jet 4BBL and it has a hot air choke with the bi-metal spring. Seeing all sorts of different applications of the Edelbrock Performer and I want to make sure I don't get the wrong one. I've seen 7111, 3711 and 2711 as the model number options but if I'm looking at it correctly, I should be using the 3711 as it's the only one with the ports for the choke stove. I've been told use the 2711 as the 1970 350 is non-EGR but since the 2711 doesn't have the choke stove port, I would just use the block off plate for the EGR on the 3711. Am I correct?
tgilligan is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:29 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
That is correct. And I don't think the 2711s are easy to find and they're definitely more expensive. I just bought a 3711 myself and it came with the EGR block off plate. I also believe the 7111 is a higher RPM manifold and if memory serves, a bit much for the 350. They're also taller and can cause hood clearance issues.
The one thing I did notice about the 3711 is that it has a threaded port of some kind at the back where my stock cast iron manny doesn't have one. Not sure what it's for and assume I'll have to plug it. Maybe someone else can chime in with an answer.
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:31 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
And as long as you're using a Q-jet, you're good. But I read that the EGR port can have clearance issues with Edel carbs and maybe others.
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:35 PM
  #4  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
The rpm 7111 if im right is a good intake., but for a stocker the 3711 is fine . Macadoo I don't know what port but on my 3711 when I ran one the carb mounting bolt holes go straight into the intake atleast on mine. I bought a set screw and put silicone on the threads and no more vac. leak. I made a block off plate from 1/8 th steel plate some intakes I think come with them though. Fwiw the 7111 will not pose hood clearance issues. I run one with a 1 in. spacer and it's no where near hitting the hood.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:36 PM
  #5  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
I had to run a 1 in. spacer when I ran an edelbrock carb. I also bent the linkage to make it work.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:43 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
69ishHoliday's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 492
Bob Stone of Classic Carbs that restored a Q-Jet for me strongly recommended using an electric choke so I did. I used a 3711 performer and block-off plates, but if I had owned a 2711 it would have looked cleaner (no block-off plates). I'm happy with how my engine is running and since I really didn't intend on my motor seeing high RPM's I'm satisfied. That said the 7111 looks better and would certainly be better with a more aggressive engine build. Just my two cents. - Steven
69ishHoliday is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:46 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
Copper, the port I'm speaking of is all the way in the very back of the manifold, about 3/4 - an inch in diameter, and is threaded. I'll see if I can get a pic tomorrow.
Good to know about the 7111 and no clearance issues.
tgilligan, you could always get an electric choke if you really wanted to run the 2711, if you felt it was worth the extra effort and expense.
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:52 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tgilligan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Stratford, New Jersey
Posts: 337
Thanks Macadoo, at least I know I'm looking at the correct one. One other question comes to mind. Did you pull the old vacuum switch and temperature sensor from the stock intake and put it on the Edelbrock or did you buy new? I was doing a quick search on RockAuto and some other parts websites and I can't find the damn things. There's a few fittings on my stock setup that I'll need to move over or find replacements just not sure what they all are. One of them is a square vacuum fitting with a single port, then there's a tree vacuum that has a couple of ports as well as a couple of sensors along with a larger vacuum break in the rear passenger corner....interesting.....

Sorry for the rambling, but as this is all running in my head, I'm already running at 100mph as it is....
tgilligan is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:53 PM
  #9  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,525
There is a vacuum port back there.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:56 PM
  #10  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
macadoo I went in the basement to look and if you are talking about the port behind the carb that's for the brake booster. The one towards the #8 cylinder is for a vacuum source tee like for ac , trans etc. the corners are for coolant.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 06:58 PM
  #11  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
Tgilligan I would clean up your old vac. fitting and re use them. They don't wear out and as long as they look good I wouldn't hestitate to use them.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 07:09 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
That thing in the front is a called a...er...umm.....found it; the distributor vacuum control switch. It has an elecrical hook up on the top and three vac lines coming off of it. Mine was all busted up so I bought one from a dude that sells them here. Most of the other switches I'm replacing because they're in bad shape and I'm adding an electric choke and needed to update one of them.
There has been some debate about the DVCS and whether or not it's needed. I'm erring on the side of caution as it does play a role in vacuum advance.
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 21st, 2013, 07:18 PM
  #13  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by Macadoo
There has been some debate about the DVCS and whether or not it's needed. I'm erring on the side of caution as it does play a role in vacuum advance.
It's not needed, and your car will run better if it is advanced to where it should be in the first place.

Also, in your specific situation, you essentially can't use it, as you are replacing your cam, and the setup for the new cam is predicated on having one vacuum curve under all circumstances, and not a separate retarded curve for the lower gears.

Ask Mark about that. I'm sure he'll agree.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old November 22nd, 2013, 04:24 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
Well then, it looks like I have a DVCS for sale. What do I do, just plug the hole?
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 22nd, 2013, 04:26 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
This is the back driver's side of the cast iron manifold.

[IMG][/IMG]

This is the back driver's side (same spot) of the Performer.

[IMG][/IMG]
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 22nd, 2013, 04:35 AM
  #16  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,630
Just plug it. I got mine plugged.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old November 22nd, 2013, 05:17 AM
  #17  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Yeah, just use pipe thread plugs on both of those holes.
The one in the left rear corner is over the coolant passage - I guess just to give you versatility on hose routing in non-stock applications (with your cam and intake, you are now in the non-stock world...).

-Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old November 22nd, 2013, 05:29 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
tgilligan, didn't mean to hijack your thread. But it should be useful information for you as well. Let us know what you end up buying.
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 22nd, 2013, 05:51 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
tgilligan, I'm afraid with the block off plate and plugged holes my 3711 is going to look a little Frankensteined. If I were to do it again I'd spend the extra $50 on the 2711.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Edelbrock-27...18228f&vxp=mtr

Of course then you have to add on the price of the electric choke and the oil sending unit to hook it up.

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ke-wiring.html
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 08:30 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
wcourt3010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 170
Originally Posted by Macadoo
And as long as you're using a Q-jet, you're good. But I read that the EGR port can have clearance issues with Edel carbs and maybe others.

this is copied from the Edelbrock website.

Carburetor Recommendations: #2711: Edelbrock Thunder Series AVS or Performer Series carb, 500-650 cfm (see pages 29-40). #3711: OEM 4-bbl.
Installation Notes: Edelbrock Performer Series, Thunder Series AVS and Carter AFB carburetors will not fit #3711. Recommended intake gasket: Fel-Pro #MS96027. For 403 Pontiac Trans Am, use OEM 4-bbl. only (for shaker hood clearance). EGR block-off plate included. Use choke block-off plate #8951 (included). Factory cruise control will not clear EGR valve without linkage alteration. For EGR applications, use stock carb only. HEI will clear this manifold. Manifold height: A-2.50", B-3.90" see A/B Measurements. Port exit dimensions: 1.18" x 1.86".
wcourt3010 is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 11:17 AM
  #21  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,911
I always switch to an electric choke much less finicky and much easier to get right. Good part about the 2711 is the wider carb pad and no EGR crossover.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 12:16 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 13,738
Originally Posted by Macadoo
tgilligan, I'm afraid with the block off plate and plugged holes my 3711 is going to look a little Frankensteined.
Here's a picture of my engine with a 7111 that is "Frankensteined":

EdelbrockPerformerRPM1.jpg 350EngineperfRPMsideviewresized.jpg

Sorry but I don't have any pics of the 3711 with the EGR blockoff plate installed.

Originally Posted by Macadoo
Of course then you have to add on the price of the electric choke and the oil sending unit to hook it up.
Choke coils can be cheap and the oil sending unit is not mandatory.
I got an electric choke coil from the local salvage yard for $7 and connected it to the IGN terminal on the fuse block. Sure, the choke is powered if the key is on (forward) and the engine is not running, but since I never operate my car in that fashion it doesn't matter.

Last edited by Fun71; November 25th, 2013 at 12:20 PM.
Fun71 is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 12:52 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
wcourt3010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 170
Originally Posted by olds 307 and 403
I always switch to an electric choke much less finicky and much easier to get right. Good part about the 2711 is the wider carb pad and no EGR crossover.


so can an OEM QJet be used with the 2711 intake?
wcourt3010 is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 03:23 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
Originally Posted by wcourt3010
so can an OEM QJet be used with the 2711 intake?
Yes, as long as you don't need the heat stove for the choke or the EGR port.

Fun71, I dig your valve train holder. That's slick. And that 7111 is going to look badass no matter what you do to it
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 03:47 PM
  #25  
Hookers under Hood
 
76olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 3,543
Re: coolant port left rear of intake

Originally Posted by Macadoo
This is the back driver's side of the cast iron manifold.

I have a heater hose running to this on my 1976 olds 350
[IMG][/IMG]

This is the back driver's side (same spot) of the Performer.

[IMG][/IMG]
76olds is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 04:14 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
My heater hose is on the other side, back passenger side (right side).
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 05:33 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 13,738
Originally Posted by Macadoo
Fun71, I dig your valve train holder. That's slick.
Yeah, I'm cheap + an engineer so I tend to do things simply and inexpensively.
Fun71 is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 05:46 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
A cheap engineer? You sound like a good friend to have.
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 25th, 2013, 06:10 PM
  #29  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
The engineer may be cheap, but somehow the project still always seems to come in over budget.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old November 26th, 2013, 12:15 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Macadoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 3,900
A typical conversation between Mac and his wife. Mac; "Honey, I have this thing I want to do. It should cost around $500". Wife; "Okay, sounds good. So about $1000." Mac; No, I said $500." Wife; "Oh right right....so $1500..."
And darn it if she's not always right.
Macadoo is offline  
Old November 18th, 2016, 11:27 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Beenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 67
having this issue too

i have the same look on my stock manifold and now have the 2711 and it has this hole too . my heater hose is connected to the same hole, on the passenger side . so a pipe plug will be fine ? should i Teflon tape the plug? what size is that hole 3/4 right ?
thanks
Beenz is offline  
Old November 19th, 2016, 05:00 AM
  #32  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,911
Start new threads, this is another old one. Yes, 3/4" and teflon tape is a good idea since it is under pressure. Just go to the plumbing section at your local hardware store.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old November 20th, 2016, 08:13 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 529
If the hole is appropriately 3/4" diameter it'll take a 1/2" npt fitting.
Cutlass Fan is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jensenracing77
Parts For Sale
3
February 16th, 2024 03:00 PM
yeahbuddy
Small Blocks
28
March 12th, 2016 12:29 PM
Dshelvy
Small Blocks
6
December 14th, 2011 06:15 AM
yeahbuddy
Parts Wanted
0
August 7th, 2011 04:12 PM
fast67vellen2o
Parts For Sale
0
October 24th, 2010 06:11 PM



Quick Reply: Edelbrock Intake Manifold - 350 Olds 5.7L



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:09 AM.