Connecting Rod Specs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 24th, 2010, 06:16 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Connecting Rod Specs

Does anybody know the rod specs for a 350? Can't find them anywhere. Looking for rod length, crank pin, wrist pin, and BE width measurements.

Thanks
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 24th, 2010, 06:25 PM
  #2  
InfoJunkie
 
InfoJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Belleville ON Canada
Posts: 287
length center to center.................6.733"
dia con rod bore...........................2.2495"-2.250"
dia pin bore............................ .9789"-.9795"
brg clearance(vertical)............. .0004"-.0033"
side clrnce big end.................. .002"-.013"
hope that helps
InfoJunkie is offline  
Old October 24th, 2010, 09:06 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,841
Specs are in the factory chassis service manual.
The data in the post above were probably taken from the 1970 manual, including the errors in it
rod length, center to center is 5.998" to 6.002"
bearing clearance .0005" to .0026"
Run to Rund is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 05:19 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Does anybody know, since it's quite hard to find rods for the 350(found a few for the 455) if I were to buy some rods at that legnth and bearing clearance what else I'd have to take into consideration in addtion to that, would be using them with speed pro flat top pistions and for now #7A heads(1/4" A).
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 05:33 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Rickman48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Shorewood, Il.
Posts: 3,057
I'm sure someone on here has a set of used or reconditioned rods for sale - have you looked in the 'for sale' section??
What happened to your old set?
Rickman48 is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 05:39 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by InfoJunkie
length center to center.................6.733" That's a big block
dia con rod bore...........................2.2495"-2.250"
dia pin bore............................ .9789"-.9795"
brg clearance(vertical)............. .0004"-.0033"
side clrnce big end.................. .002"-.013"
hope that helps

You should be able to find some fairly easily if you don't have yours.
Or you can always buy some aftermarket SBC rods, have your crank ground to fit and get a .060 over 350/400 SBC piston. Bunch of options, like this,

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/STL-H860CP60/

By the time you recon your stock rods with the cost of new bolts if you go that way, you can buy a better aftermarket piece.

Last edited by cutlassefi; October 25th, 2010 at 05:45 AM.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old October 25th, 2010, 05:48 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by Rickman48
I'm sure someone on here has a set of used or reconditioned rods for sale - have you looked in the 'for sale' section??
What happened to your old set?

I still have my old set, but am thinking of going lighter with the rods, I have cast rods right now and it just seems way to bulky when the pistons barely weight anything.
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 05:50 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
You should be able to find some fairly easily if you don't have yours.
Or you can always buy some aftermarket SBC rods, have your crank ground to fit and get a .060 over 350/400 SBC piston. Bunch of options, like this,

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/STL-H860CP60/

By the time you recon your stock rods with the cost of new bolts if you go that way, you can buy a better aftermarket piece.
That kind of what I'm thinking, exactly what you said about cost of reconditioning the old rods and price of new rods. Although I'm hoping to keep these pistions they are forged aluminum and in excellent condition.
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 06:40 AM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,259
Note that ALL small block Olds gas engine rods from 1964-1990 will interchange, though 403s used beefier (and thus heavier) rods than other SBOs.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old October 25th, 2010, 06:59 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by coldwar
Your existing rods are forged steel. The only factory Oldsmobile rods I am aware of which are castings are some 215 rods, which are cast Arma-Steel like Pontiac. CW
Seriously? I'll never claim to know much but that I did not know. They just felt so damn heavy I assumed they were cast.
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 07:24 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by SPEEDROCKET
I still have my old set, but am thinking of going lighter with the rods, I have cast rods right now and it just seems way to bulky when the pistons barely weight anything.
Stock rods and pistons in a 350 are heavy anyway. If you use the piston I mentioned along with a Scat 6.200 rod you'll lose over 250 grams of weight per rod journal(x4). 454 grams is a pound. That's a bunch.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old October 25th, 2010, 07:33 AM
  #12  
InfoJunkie
 
InfoJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Belleville ON Canada
Posts: 287
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
The data in the post above were probably taken from the 1970 manual, including the errors in it
Thats exactly where its from. It's a case of eyes to fingers rather than eyes to brain to fingers.
I'll have to get rid of that book now.
InfoJunkie is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 08:41 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Stock rods and pistons in a 350 are heavy anyway. If you use the piston I mentioned along with a Scat 6.200 rod you'll lose over 250 grams of weight per rod journal(x4). 454 grams is a pound. That's a bunch.
If I do use the 6.200 rod... is that piston designed to ensure valve clearance up top? Also if I lighten up the rotating assembly does that make it safer to run a little more rpms safely with the stock crank and the bottom end of the 350?
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 08:48 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,841
To add to Joe's post, the diesel 350 rods are beefier and have floating pins with bushed small ends. Stock rods are fine. The place to save weight is in the pistons and pins which are quite heavy by today's standards. If you bush stock rods down to .927" (SBC size) and deck the block 0.050" you can use 350 + .060" (if you don't need to bore the block, just hone it) high perf. ("race") pistons and pins and save 1/2 pound per cylinder.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 10:12 AM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
To add to Joe's post, the diesel 350 rods are beefier and have floating pins with bushed small ends. Stock rods are fine. The place to save weight is in the pistons and pins which are quite heavy by today's standards. If you bush stock rods down to .927" (SBC size) and deck the block 0.050" you can use 350 + .060" (if you don't need to bore the block, just hone it) high perf. ("race") pistons and pins and save 1/2 pound per cylinder.
The block is ready, its .30 over right now. I have to send the crank in to the shop to get polished, I don't quite know if it needs ground or not. But before I send it in, I want to have the pistons and rods ready, along with harmonic balancer and flywheel so they can balanced it before I get it back. Is floating pins better than pressed?
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 10:39 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by SPEEDROCKET
The block is ready, its .30 over right now. I have to send the crank in to the shop to get polished, I don't quite know if it needs ground or not. But before I send it in, I want to have the pistons and rods ready, along with harmonic balancer and flywheel so they can balanced it before I get it back. Is floating pins better than pressed?
Why spend the money to have the stock rods bushed blah blah blah. You're still using 40 year old stuff.

IMO I'd bore it to use a 4.125 SBC piston, grind the crank accordingly and be done. Lots of parts availablilty, much lighter and stronger than stock and will most certainly rev better. I've done it, ran sweet.

JMO.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old October 25th, 2010, 10:52 AM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Why spend the money to have the stock rods bushed blah blah blah. You're still using 40 year old stuff.


> I haven't said anything about using stock rods, lol.


IMO I'd bore it to use a 4.125 SBC piston, grind the crank accordingly and be done. Lots of parts availablilty, much lighter and stronger than stock and will most certainly rev better. I've done it, ran sweet.

JMO.
What bore would I have to do to get to 4.125? What's .30 put me up to in inches?
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 10:57 AM
  #18  
InfoJunkie
 
InfoJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Belleville ON Canada
Posts: 287
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
You're still using 40 year old stuff.
JMO.
Block,crank and heads are still 40 years old.
Pistons should be bought before the block is bored so they can be fitted for proper side clearance. Your kinda stuck now with Olds pistons and rods unless you want to bore the block again. The idea is collect all the parts first then proceed.
Stock 4.057 +.030= 4.087 you have another .038 to go

Last edited by InfoJunkie; October 25th, 2010 at 11:02 AM.
InfoJunkie is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 11:38 AM
  #19  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by SPEEDROCKET
I still have my old set, but am thinking of going lighter with the rods, I have cast rods right now and it just seems way to bulky when the pistons barely weight anything.
Excuse me but you did say you were using speed pro flat tops, right? barely weigh anything? Those things are friggin tanks by today's performance standards. They are strong and reliable, though. I have them in my current 355, IIRC the bob-weight with stock rods was 2220, yikes! For a small engine, that is HEAVY.

At this point your best bet is just to use the stock rods and the pistons that you have. Plenty of guys have gone quick enough safely with that combination of parts, just build it a tad loose, balance it, and you'll be fine to 6,000 rpm and 450 HP. Like Junkie stated, best to research and collect parts first. So, unless you want to start over.....
captjim is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 03:13 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by captjim
Excuse me but you did say you were using speed pro flat tops, right? barely weigh anything? Those things are friggin tanks by today's performance standards. They are strong and reliable, though. I have them in my current 355, IIRC the bob-weight with stock rods was 2220, yikes! For a small engine, that is HEAVY.

At this point your best bet is just to use the stock rods and the pistons that you have. Plenty of guys have gone quick enough safely with that combination of parts, just build it a tad loose, balance it, and you'll be fine to 6,000 rpm and 450 HP. Like Junkie stated, best to research and collect parts first. So, unless you want to start over.....
I would like to use them if I can, if not, I may just sell them off and start over not sure yet. There are 100 different ways to go here and I'm trying to hash it all out by bouncing ideas off you guys. The pistons that I have though are forged aluminum, and what I have to compare them with(havent' put them on a scale or anything) but they don't seem much different in weight then a 4.6 ford piston. The whole issue I'm having here is that the engine is apart and I'm trying to do it all right the first time and not do anything that makes me want to tear it back apart again to change something (the reason I'm where I'm at now, becuase it just didn't seem like it ran right)

In the end though I could just use what I have I just hope it feels like I hope it will on the *** dyno, lol. Just trying to cross my T's and dot my I's here. Thanks for the input.

What do you mean by building it a tad loose? where would be the important areas to be loose in?
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 03:18 PM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by InfoJunkie
Block,crank and heads are still 40 years old.
Pistons should be bought before the block is bored so they can be fitted for proper side clearance. Your kinda stuck now with Olds pistons and rods unless you want to bore the block again. The idea is collect all the parts first then proceed.
Stock 4.057 +.030= 4.087 you have another .038 to go
True and good point everything is at least 40, lol, thanks for the measurments.
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 04:19 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by SPEEDROCKET
I would like to use them if I can, if not, I may just sell them off and start over not sure yet. There are 100 different ways to go here and I'm trying to hash it all out by bouncing ideas off you guys. The pistons that I have though are forged aluminum, and what I have to compare them with(havent' put them on a scale or anything) but they don't seem much different in weight then a 4.6 ford piston. The whole issue I'm having here is that the engine is apart and I'm trying to do it all right the first time and not do anything that makes me want to tear it back apart again to change something (the reason I'm where I'm at now, becuase it just didn't seem like it ran right)

In the end though I could just use what I have I just hope it feels like I hope it will on the *** dyno, lol. Just trying to cross my T's and dot my I's here. Thanks for the input.

What do you mean by building it a tad loose? where would be the important areas to be loose in?
By loose I mean the main and rod bearing clearances, rods at .0025 and mains at .0030

As always, it comes down to goals, budget, and what you plan on doing with the car.
captjim is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 05:49 PM
  #23  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SPEEDROCKET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 55
Originally Posted by captjim
By loose I mean the main and rod bearing clearances, rods at .0025 and mains at .0030

As always, it comes down to goals, budget, and what you plan on doing with the car.
Well I want something I can drive daily if I choose to, or go play occasionally at the track, not something I do to often though. Budget is kind of up in the air at the time, because I don't have a car to put it in yet whereas last time I did, so I took shortcuts and cheap ways out to get the car back on the road. I want to have the motor and tranny completely ready for the next car I buy so I don't fall into those habits again. The reason I stated all that is because I can take my time and build the motor right this time putting money into it as it comes. Hope you understand what I'm trying to say with that, lol.

I mean if I can capitalize completly off of the rods and pistons I have I'm willing to run with them. I was just worried about weight and strength of the rods. Also kind of wondering if that minor weight reduction(2lbs or so) from the rods would take a little stress off of the crank and lower end of the engine and caps. Making an engine that I shouldn't have to tear apart again as long as I own it. As you can tell I'm not an expert here, but know enough to break something, ha, and have, twice!
SPEEDROCKET is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 06:02 PM
  #24  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
x2 what CaptJim said. If you do everything right, check the rods, resize if needed, balance it and make sure clearances are correct you should be fine. Then you can devote your time and money to the heads.

When you cut corners, that's when you get into trouble.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old October 25th, 2010, 06:26 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,841
Cutlassefi, please let me know when you find an off the shelf 4.125" SBC piston with close to 1.61" compression height.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old October 25th, 2010, 06:42 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,824
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Stock rods and pistons in a 350 are heavy anyway. If you use the piston I mentioned along with a Scat 6.200 rod you'll lose over 250 grams of weight per rod journal(x4). 454 grams is a pound. That's a bunch.
Don't need to, Scat 6.200 rod+1.425 Comp Distance piston, half of a 3.400 stroke (gotta grind the crank anyway to fit the rod, 1.700)=9.325. I believe that's right about the avg deck height of a SBO. The piston number I gave was a 4.060 with a 1.425 comp distance. Or you can bore it to 4.125 and use a 400/5.7 rod SBC piston with that same rod. Any other questions?

Last edited by cutlassefi; October 25th, 2010 at 07:01 PM.
cutlassefi is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
chucho
Big Blocks
4
March 30th, 2012 01:48 AM
Al2011
Big Blocks
8
September 19th, 2011 04:50 PM
Seff
Small Blocks
10
August 20th, 2011 04:52 AM
jensenracing77
Big Blocks
14
June 1st, 2009 05:59 PM
Stborden
Big Blocks
3
October 31st, 2008 05:46 PM



Quick Reply: Connecting Rod Specs



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 AM.