Head Porting? Valve Job?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23rd, 2010, 08:46 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
76Supreme350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Peabody MA (01960)
Posts: 85
Head Porting? Valve Job?

Hello. I have a 1976 Cutlass with a 350. I am putting in 1.6 roller rockers, performer rpm intake, and a holley 700. I was figuring while doing that I should replace the head gasket because its my daily driver. Also, while the heads were off I figured I should go get them ported with the extra parts going on. I found another set of heads off of a (i believe to be) 1970 cutlass in a junkyard nearby. They want 100 for both heads. My first question, should I get them so that way my car wont be out of commission for longer than a day. Also, when I get them ported and polished should I also get it cut to raise compression ratio or will I run into valve clearance. And last, should I get the valve enlarged and are there even any larger valves available, or is it possible. Thanks.
76Supreme350 is offline  
Old May 24th, 2010, 05:18 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
First off, going with older 350 heads will raise the Cr quite a bit as the chambers will be 15 cc +/- smaller. So yes, get the older heads, have larger intake valves installed and spend the extra money on a little bowl work. No need to have the ports worked on or polished, IMO.

While you have the intake off, and to take advantage of the compression ratio increase, I would definitely upgrade the cam and chain, you are already half way there. Something like the 60801 Voodoo, 16-18 Engle, or as always get Mark to grind you one. Something in the .480208 @ .050 neighborhood. Your Cr should be around 8.6 to 1.
captjim is offline  
Old May 24th, 2010, 08:28 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Warhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 1,012
Sounds like a good plan.
Not doing the valve job/guides is like throwing power away. 20-50 hp in some cases.
$100 is a good price for those heads. Get larger intake valves installed (good power for $, unlike the exhaust side), 1.875 is stock, a 2 inch intake is a good move up, along with a bowl clean-up. Have them do a 30 degree back cut on the intake valve, while they are at it.

I would keep the cut to around .030" max, but you will not have to worry about valve clearance at these lifts.
Good luck,
Jim
Warhead is offline  
Old May 24th, 2010, 09:19 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
76Supreme350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Peabody MA (01960)
Posts: 85
Hows this? http://www.jegs.com/i/Lunati/638/00083LK/10002/-1
76Supreme350 is offline  
Old May 25th, 2010, 09:40 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by 76Supreme350
Waaaaaaaaay too big.
captjim is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 06:06 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
88 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,212
Originally Posted by captjim
........ get Mark to grind you one. ........
Is cutlassefi claiming to be a cam grinder?

Norm
88 coupe is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 06:14 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Is cutlassefi claiming to be a cam grinder?

Norm
I don't know what he claims to be, ask him. I do know that he has helped several fellas on here with their camshaft selection and purchase.
captjim is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 02:09 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
76Supreme350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Peabody MA (01960)
Posts: 85
Ok, I got the heads and the valve job is going to run 600 with bigger valves included. Is this about as low as I can get? Someone else said 700.
76Supreme350 is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 02:41 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Warhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Phx, AZ
Posts: 1,012
There is always a way to spend more, $600 for this with the bigger valves going in is a good price.
Are they doing guides, and new valve springs?

Jim

Last edited by Warhead; May 26th, 2010 at 03:23 PM.
Warhead is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 02:58 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
citcapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idano
Posts: 9,127
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Is cutlassefi claiming to be a cam grinder?

Norm
Nope, but he can get you a heck of a good deal on a cams, lifters, and he has the knowledge to help you select a cam if you give him the correct information on your engine build, transmission, convertor, rear end, etc. quality american made parts too. I shopped around quite a bit before I bought my cam and roller lifters. I also checked him out with other guys who used his services and did not find any compliants.
citcapp is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 03:28 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by citcapp
Nope, but he can get you a heck of a good deal on a cams, lifters, and he has the knowledge to help you select a cam if you give him the correct information on your engine build, transmission, convertor, rear end, etc. quality american made parts too. I shopped around quite a bit before I bought my cam and roller lifters. I also checked him out with other guys who used his services and did not find any compliants.
Classicolds resident troll Norm has made 2 posts in SBO tech forum. The one in this thread,
"Is cutlassefi claiming to be a cam grinder?"

And this in the "suggestions for build" thread,
"Without a precise definition of "unstreetable" your arguments are worthless."

Both are argumentative and add zero info, experience, or perspective to either thread, yet he constantly chastises others for doing the same thing, and the moderators here allow him to do so. Mark has done nothing but help guys, Norm does nothing but criticize and argue. Same old story.
captjim is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 04:09 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,827
Thank you Jim and Pat. I try to help as you said, I've been in a position where some nitwit like Norm gave advice straight from a book, not from experience, and it wasn't worth a darn.

I'm not perfect, but I try to offer real world facts that I've experienced over the years. Norm doesn't have a clue.

Here's Panos' dyno sheet from monday. In case you don't know the specs they are;

10.85:1
Erson Hyd Roller 238/246 on a 110 in at 105.
Out of the box Performer with just the center divider cut
Out of the box Quick Fuel 830
C heads with 4 angle valve job with crossovers filled and center divider welded, otherwise bone stock

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ess-455-a.html

76Supreme, I'd be happy to help. Email me anytime.

Last edited by cutlassefi; May 26th, 2010 at 04:11 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 04:13 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by captjim
Classicolds resident troll Norm has made 2 posts in SBO tech forum. The one in this thread,
"Is cutlassefi claiming to be a cam grinder?"

And this in the "suggestions for build" thread,
"Without a precise definition of "unstreetable" your arguments are worthless."

Both are argumentative and add zero info, experience, or perspective to either thread, yet he constantly chastises others for doing the same thing, and the moderators here allow him to do so. Mark has done nothing but help guys, Norm does nothing but criticize and argue. Same old story.
clapsmiley.gif clapsmiley.gif clapsmiley.gif
Attached Images
File Type: gif
clapsmiley.gif (1.9 KB, 1 views)
File Type: gif
clapsmiley.gif (1.9 KB, 1 views)
380 Racer is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 04:20 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
By the way Norm, thank you for using a quote from me in your signature. Shows how you can take something not only out of context but also alter it at the same time. Sheesh......get a life!
380 Racer is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 05:41 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
67 Cutlass Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 978
Porting

I have a 1976 Cutlass with a 350
This engine from the factory had 79cc heads with low compression deep dish pistons. I believe 8.5:1. The '72 had 69cc heads. That would increase your CR some but most likely not more than 1/2 a point. You could & should mill some without any valve to piston clearance issues. What are your goals? How much money, I mean how fast do you want to go?

Also, while the heads were off I figured I should go get them ported with the extra parts going on.
Pocket porting is good. Bowl enlargement is the only way you can fully take advantage of larger valves. Filling the heat risers & welding the exhaust dividers is also a good idea. Enlarging the ports themselves is very time consuming. If you are going to port yourself do your research. I've ported a few sets. Each set takes me about 80 hours. I do not have a CNC. More flow is not always the answer. For more torque smaller ports yield higher velocity.

I found another set of heads off of a (i believe to be) 1970 cutlass in a junkyard nearby. They want 100 for both heads. My first question, should I get them so that way my car wont be out of commission for longer than a day.
Offer them $200 for the complete long block. Build a completely different performance engine. Beef up the bottom end. Get some higher compression pistons. Maybe a halo, some light weight rotating components. Maybe consider a stroker with Chevy rods. You should know what cam and lifters your going to use to select the correct valve springs.
Here's some photos comparing a set of ported BB heads to unported #4 castings off a 1967 330 with 64cc combustion chambers. It's really hard to get good photos of the runners with a my digital POS camera.






If you are considering porting the heads yourself you should check out these two tech articles -

http://www.mondellotwister.com/ArtHeadPort.htm
http://www.mondellotwister.com/ArtPtngAtHme.htm

I know everyone has a very negative opinion of the big "M", but Joe is a great guy and has made huge contributions to the Olds community. Please don't get me started about Lynn.
67 Cutlass Freak is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 06:03 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
88 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,212
Here it is again:

Originally Posted by captjim
........ or as always get Mark to grind you one. ........
If the suggestion is followed and Mark grinds a cam, wouldn't it make him a cam grinder?

Originally Posted by 88 coupe
........ Is cutlassefi claiming to be a cam grinder?
Considering the statement, how is the question not legitimate?


Originally Posted by citcapp
Nope ........
Thanks. I will assume that captjim simply misspoke and, as he has in the past, launched a personal attack, in order to divert attention from it.

Originally Posted by 380 Racer
........ Shows how you can take something not only out of context but also alter it at the same time ........
On the outside chance that anyone might like to view the original posts, simply click those two blue buttons in my sig.

Considering the content and lack of maturity, shown in the last four posts, I find it interesting that captjim is the one who complains about the lack of moderation.

Norm
88 coupe is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 06:22 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Norm, you are hysterical!!

67 Cutlass freak, on a standard bore/stroke 350, the compression ratio difference between 79cc and 69cc is .73

Also, aren't most #8 heads more like 80+ where some 350 heads are 68 or less? That WOULD make the change almost a point.
captjim is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 07:37 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
67 Cutlass Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 978
captjim wrote-
on a standard bore/stroke 350, the compression ratio difference between 79cc and 69cc is .73

Also, aren't most #8 heads more like 80+ where some 350 heads are 68 or less? That WOULD make the change almost a point
Wow Jim I'm impressed. Good math skills. I just plugged in the numbers & came up with a .7 increase from a 10cc chamber difference also. Maybe I was thinking of a BB where 10cc's won't gain that much. I just checked the reference manual and for 1970 the Olds 350 came with a 70cc combustion chamber. All #8 heads were listed as 79cc.
67 Cutlass Freak is offline  
Old May 26th, 2010, 07:40 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
So Norm, just take anything about me out of your sig line as it was taken out of context of that whole thread. Got that *uckstick?
380 Racer is offline  
Old May 27th, 2010, 10:25 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by 67 Cutlass Freak
captjim wrote-


Wow Jim I'm impressed. Good math skills. I just plugged in the numbers & came up with a .7 increase from a 10cc chamber difference also. Maybe I was thinking of a BB where 10cc's won't gain that much. I just checked the reference manual and for 1970 the Olds 350 came with a 70cc combustion chamber. All #8 heads were listed as 79cc.
No math skills here, my brother, ONLINE CALCULATORS!
http://www.angelfire.com/fl/procrastination/motor.html

I have measured quite a few older 350 heads, and yes most come in around 68-69 cc. I have not measured many (if any???) # 8 heads, so I have no idea how accurate the published data is.
Also, depending on what head gasket is used on the engine, he might even pick up another .15 by going to a .028
captjim is offline  
Old May 27th, 2010, 05:01 PM
  #21  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
76Supreme350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Peabody MA (01960)
Posts: 85
Jeeze, I don't check for a day and there is a war going on, lol.

The heads are from a 70, not a 72. The machine shop guy told me they were around 64cc. I'm not looking for a super fast car. I'm building a sbc for my 80 LeMans that is getting all the high performance. I just wanted to add an intake, carb and rockers, but figured a gasket change and those heads would help some. I will probably just get the valve job done and leave it at that.
76Supreme350 is offline  
Old May 29th, 2010, 10:19 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
88 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,212
Originally Posted by 380 Racer
........ just take anything about me out of your sig line as it was taken out of context of that whole thread.
If you have an objection to my sig, send me the details in a PM. If you can show that your complaint is valid, I will be happy to replace it with an apology.

Norm
88 coupe is offline  
Old July 21st, 2010, 11:54 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
geckonz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 537
67 Cutlass freak ---I can see where the 80 hrs come from/go to.
Those heads look preeemo .
How do they flow ?notice the difference ??
mike
geckonz08 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
L69
Racing and High Performance
57
March 15th, 2020 09:37 PM
TexasGunner
Small Blocks
10
August 29th, 2013 07:51 AM
L69
Major Builds & Projects
0
July 27th, 2012 08:10 AM
BosMobile
Big Blocks
4
June 19th, 2009 10:33 AM
johnfharding
Eighty-Eight
7
December 16th, 2008 07:20 AM



Quick Reply: Head Porting? Valve Job?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:05 PM.